roversfan99

I do find it astounding how underappreciated a regular, consistent 20+ goal a season striker now is since his departure. He did his side of the bargain consistently throughout his time here, retrospectively painting a picture that we would have been better had he not been there is ridiculous. If you had to prioritise one thing in a striker, goals, pace, hold up, give me goals anytime.

Rhodes and Gestede scored over 40 between them. Rhodes scored more than a goal every other game. If there was one area of the pitch that didnt need rectifying, it was up front.

Even if you play 2 up front, you tend to have one dropping off especially when out of position. He is essentially a second striker though. You may aswell view him as a striker because if you ever think hes a hindrance in terms of not being able to play a more "orthodox" striker alongside the one we play anyway, you have to think, would they be able to match a very healthy goal return of above 1 in 3 during his Championship career? Most strikers wouldnt, his goal to game ratio averages out at 18 goals if he was to play a full 46 games. He is not a midfielder, thats for sure.

I very much doubt Rochina could get close to the consistent goal output Rhodes provided, so ultimately I suspect it may have been easier on the eye at the cost of effectiveness.

Did we play to Rhodes? Managers came and went, players changed, formations changed, styles changed, the only thing that was constant was him scoring goals. That first season our team was a shambles and yet he scored goal after goal, often with partners that flattered to deceive, Kazim Richards, Best, Rochina, an ancient Nuno Gomes, the formation changed to 433 near the end, he had David Goodwillie out wide, no matter what system, he scored. Half way through Bowyers (first?) season he signed Conway and Gestede, them 2 transformed our style in that it was much about wing play and crosses to Gestede, doesnt really suit Rhodes as much, still he continued to score. Then the side was dismantled and he was still scoring until the end, already in double figures when he was sold at the start of January. And likewise, do we play to Dack? We play him (usually) in his favoured position, and quite rightly considering how effective he is. Not sure we play around him in a way that solely suits him.

I believe Preston had their entire back 4 of Fisher, Bauer, Davies and Hughes out injured, also saw that Gallagher wasnt playing and that Alan Browne was playing as an emergency right back. Bet they wished they had VAR too.

Its been mentioned numerous times but nothings been done so I dont think its close.

Fair play for going to the effort but im not sure it is fair to compare players that are all playing in different positions. Bradley Dack is the best player at the club, 100%.

Has to be the same team and anything less than a win will be a great dissapointment.

I think Walton based on hardly glowing recomendations from his Wigan days where he was dropped for some of last season is just not particularly great. That said, its definitely fair to question our goalkeeping coach baring in mind his non existent CV and a lack of development from any of our goalkeepers under him. You look at Raya and he suddenly has seemingly developed under a new coach.

Seen the goal and yet another dreadful error by Walton. Thats 5 directly leading to goals in 7 or 8 games, its unsustainable.

Which he quite often does! But fair play to todays goal and hopefully he goes on a run.

Didnt see the game so cant comment on the performance but delighted with this last week, and have to say well done to Mowbray for 3 wins on the bounce. The Barnsley win Mowbray referred to as one we just needed to win regardless of performance. It just seemed to be a win highlighting all of the flaws in the team, and all of the repeated mistakes of the manager. The Brentford win came from a much improved performance, and today is an away win ground out, cant argue at all. The side we have settled on is essentially the side that finished last season plus Adarabioyo who is an upgrade on Williams and Downing who is very much a makeshift left back but an improvement on Bell for sure. Plus Walton who is a downgrade! Reliance on Dacks goal are a concern, but great to see him in top form.

Proper strikers goal too, delighted!

Rhodes was the master at making his own chances, more by what he did off the ball. Dack can do the same, as to perhaps a slightly lesser extent can Graham. All 3 score plenty of proper strikers goals from close range. Its all about intelligence and anticipation. Rhodes might not be fast, but Armstrong is fast, something that doesnt help him when he spends half the game offside when he plays up front, Rhodes was smaller than Gallagher, and less powerful, but he scored headers by clever movement to get free of defenders. Excuses about supply aside, Rhodes scored nearly 30 goals in the dreadful side we had, full of disinterested or incompetent players after we came down. Gallagher lacks that strikers brain.

Neither should play in the reserves ahead of the younger lads but if either should be given the chance to keep ticking over out of loyalty, or kept somewhat fit in case of a major injury crisis, youd think Smallwood would deserve that as a key player in our promotion, rather than someone who has done absolutely nothing to warrant the token gesture of not only game time in the reserves but more importantly in his case, a contract.

1 goal. As ive said before, whilst service hasnt been great I dont think he will ever be a goalscorer because he doesnt anticipate chances, his movement is non existence and technically he is below par. Look at Rhodes when he played for us, especially at the start in a poor team, no particularly stand out attributes but he knew where the ball would drop. Dack is the same to an extent, so many goals from close range. Im not sure what type of service that would actually supposedly suit him. He needs to learn how to hold the ball up though, you cant always run onto the ball although hes not great at doing that either.

I think Gallagher is getting off lightly in terms of people overstating the proportion of games he has played wide. He has played central in at least half of his games and has been awful in all but one of them.

Mitrovic, Kalvin Phillips, Jarrod Bowen.

How have I been proved wrong, or dissapeared? I think Graham is a very good striker, I always champion his inclusion, I used to debate especially with chaddy who wrote him off at one point. But Rhodes was superb for us and its foolish to forget that. He was better than Graham has been IMO and his goal record backs me up.

Graham is class but has never scored 20 goals for us. Rhodes did every year. Goals are overrated though I suppose!

Nothing wrong with Brereton and Chapman playing, young lads like the rest of them. Not keen on Gallagher being back in the squad this week. Samuel should never play for the first team and is older so not sure on that. Gladwin is a pure sentimental gesture so thats wrong.

The side on Wednesday night was well balanced, with that front 6 being the same one that ended the season so well. It would be criminal to change things up out of fear of Stoke. That 11 was good off the ball and offers a threat on the break and an out ball.

I never go, its irrelevant to the point I am making, I am able to look past my own wants and needs and am looking at the club and the constant down scaling that Waggott overlooks.

But our performance last night was very good, the side was well balanced and everyone was 7 out of 10 minimum. Why break it up and change it? Mowbray has often over compensated for his opposition at the cost of our own strengths. Armstrong can run at Stephen Ward and Downing linked up very well with Rothwell down the left.