Jump to content
1950’s Retro Shirts ×

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Fancy us to get something out of this now
  3. I think the most bizarre thing is yellow cards standing so players from both teams unfairly have more chance of a ban from accumulating cautions. I do think we now need to move on but it’s noticeable on social media that some Ipswich fans have a weird obsession with us now
  4. What ever the reason is there needs to be a grown up conversation to get this rediculous disagreement sorted.
  5. I think the club gave him an undeserved present in March! I don't rate him at all...
  6. I know. His results have been crap overall. But again, youve not really addressed the general theme beyond just Ismael to deflect attention away from the dreadful running of the club. Its the EFL's fault, its the refs fault, its the LT's fault.
  7. Is that against the dingles? Edit - apparently so.. thanks Venkys/Suhail/etc
  8. Now I know that you won’t explain why you made that strange comment (I presume you misunderstood what Ghost7 was saying, but as you don’t hold your hand up and admit that like almost everyone else would I can’t be sure) I will move on. I don’t think I was being unreasonable trying to get clarity.
  9. The ladies are currently 6-0 down jusT before half time.
  10. Anybody see the try that St. Helen’s got last night in the game against Leeds ? Sensational, Rugby Union eat your heart out for handling like that.
  11. see my reply to Ghost latest post. time you moved on
  12. I believe from memory, that the main post that was taken offence at was one on twitter just after the transfer window closed, were Jackson stated that Suhail had rejected Jacksons/the LTs approach to speak with Rudy Gestede about the transfer window. Rovers then stated that Jackson had made it personal. With the issue being that he named Suhail specifically, therefore drawing more unwanted attention to him. "This culminated in a recent social media post in which matters became personal" Edit - If I am misremembering, can someone let me know, apparently Jackson later deleted whatever post it was, so there is no physical evidence of it, just my age addled memory 😉
  13. Rovers didn’t say it. YOU said it.
  14. what post/comments has Elliott been banned for then? Ask Rovers
  15. Like I repeatably told you my opinion on Ismael will be judged on results and performances. How many more times do you really need telling but every head coach/manager will complain about penalty decision not given like I just watched Marco Silva has for Fulham. I agreed with Ismael on the Ipswich game and the EFL were wrong in the decision, you of course won't agree there.
  16. Today
  17. We know. So why would beating Ipswich have made any difference?
  18. like I said yesterday, I don't know what Elliott Jackson has been ban for. What comments or articles did the club banned for. Still none the wiser. No club should banned any media journalist from games or press conference. Rovers and LT plus Jackson need to sit down today/tomorrow and sort out this out where LT and Jackson will be at Tuesday night game covering the game
  19. My comment wasn't to do with the manager or results. It was in regard to the board and the rumours about the bad treatment of people. The statements and the personal attack on Jackson is the closest we've seen to that being backed up publicly. Really poor and concerning way of handling business from the club.
  20. You are on a rampage of trying to defend Ismael no matter what (without committing to saying that you think hes a good manager or that you are totally happy with him) that you ae not really addressing or reading the posts you are replying to in doing so. As seen by your posts about the Ipswich performance in the LT thread which has very little or even nothing to do with the posts you have quoted. Its not just Ismael. The Lancashire Telegraph stuff has nothing to do with him. The club is being run into the ground and they seem keen to redirect the blame elsewhere at the moment. Ismael is a pretty poor manager but well down the list of problems.
  21. This is a thread about the LT being banned. Ghost7 says “I feel like a new low has been hit over the weekend and there must be some very rotten and incompetent people in charge at Ewood. They've pretty much proved all the rumours right. 😔”. On this thread he’s clearly talking about a Jackson being banned. You reply with “And just go back a week and if we had beaten Ipswich, its would another different story ” So I’m asking why if we had beaten Ipswich, then the main story if the weekend which Ghost7 is referring to, the childish banning of the LT, would be a “different story”. Instead of asking you to explain, I could have just quoted you and replied Ehhhhh ????????????????
  22. Toth Miller McLoughlin Wharton Ribeiro Tronstad TGH Morishita Cantwell Hedges Gudjohnsen
  23. That’s insane!!!!! This should be a safe platform but I guess them lot have snoops everywhere
  24. The new low in the post you replied to was the club trying to silence any and all reasonable reporting by getting a decent bloke fired simply because he reported facts. Not the Charlton result. I cannot believe how far we have fallen from the values of the family-feel underdog club we were under John Williams. Venkys have done so much worse than get us relegated (twice). They've corrupted the essence of everything Blackburn Rovers used to stand for.
  25. read the comment I reply to, should give you the reply
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...