All Activity

I’m fairly sure that by law it remains a public place even if the land is privately owned, as long as it is accessible to the public (ie: as long as the gates are open). A protest outside the ground (within the gates) ought to be fine, and any ‘moving on’ would create a story.

None of our strikers are good enough to play up front on their own. I would have thought we’ve already proved that.

Timmy Shaw - Gonna Send You Back To Georgia

@KidderStreetNoise has these numbers…

Probably saving it till after the Christmas celebrations, bring us back down to earth.

The owners and their loyalists will be looking to blame poor results on a low turnout and poor atmosphere at Ewood Park. There was a big turnout and a great atmosphere versus Derby for the 150th anniversary and an even bigger and more raucous atmosphere for the game against Burnley last season, biggest home crowd and loudest it has been for many years. We bottled both of those big occasions, we've bottled every big occasion under the Venkys, so the crowd seems to have little to do with it

Which poor player will they wheel out to give the rallying cry ahead of Millwall, now they've seen the boycott call?

Nothing is off the table with this lot..nothing!

Sandie Shaw - (There’s)Always Something There To Remind Me

I hope we scrape just enough points to stay in the Championship this season, because I know that when we slip through the trap door, that will be it for a generation. At least a decade of lower league rubbish beckons when we eventually go down under this lot. Every other enjoyable aspect of supporting Rovers has been sucked out by the ownership. I still can't (can) believe the catastrophe that has occurred since the club was in 5th place last January. Complete self-inflicted disaster.

So what would you do now? Change formation now back to 4-2-3-1 formation or stick to 3-5-2?

We have got 15 points from 12 games since we changed to a back 3/5. Its hardly been a remarkable change in results.

What a great open game Utd Bournemouth was. Perfect for neutral

Is this a serious question? So you wont be attending then or aren't a STH then? No respect for fans who want to back the players and team?

So he should have stubborn and stick to 4-2-3-1 formation and ignore getting results. Playing 3 at back got us results I would move back to 4 at back for Saturday game.

100% been written by a Dingle with the help of AI. Christ sake, who refers to "the gaffer" in an open letter. Simping, quislings everyone of them. I cant wait until the day we take back Ewood and make the collaborators squirm, chase them down Bolton Road with Tar and Feathers.

Preview of tonight's U21 game, don't know why its saying Frank Vare might have earned the opportunity to step up to U21 level, he has been a fixture for the U21s for most of the season https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2025/december/16/preview--rovers-under-21s-v-watford-under-21s/

It's a good market tbf. Problem is our ability to actually sign them with the new rules. Really a shame about Whitehall. He seemed like a very promising prospect at one time, always getting rave reviews, but suffered from almost perpetual injuries.

No, they won't be anything close to what we need.

I'm interested in this idea of the Rao's in the distance (who may or may not know/care about what is going on) and those (shady?) figures on the ground who perhaps control things. The rapidity and vehemence of the responses to the coalition's letter make me think of 2 things: First, there must be figures around (not the Raos) who have much to lose and have no hesitation in resorting to smears, threats and in the past violence to fans. Second, that the responses to the coalition on social media are working for the club and probably written/dictated by the club (again not necessarily the Raos). All imo and just thinking out loud of course 🙂

There’s none so blind as those who cannot see. They deserve the Venkys, the rest of us don’t.

You’d think so, but no. It’s ‘FFP’, it’s ’crap support’, just like it was ‘bad advice’ at one point. Never, ever the owners.

But are they players knocking the door down saying to McCullum and Stokes to play me? Who are the openers/number 3 put there saying pick me? Do you need any? Are Emillo Gay or Ben McKinney or Tom Haines ready to Replace Crawley? Is Bethall ready to bat 3 and replace Pope? Should Smith bat 3 and not keeper with someone like James Rew at 6 or 7 with Jacks replacing Stokes long time as all round? Pope should have been dropped for this test for me

I’m an actual Rovers fan and I didn’t sign it.

Will be Crawley’s 62nd cap, the ninth highest for a specialist opener in English history… with an average of 31 (31!), he’s one lucky fella to be part of this set up (and being a Kent lad helps). Just think of the top players that never got near the number of chances he’s had