All Activity

Pretty sure you can but the goat @wilsdenrover will definitely find the rule 😂

Yes I jumped the gun they're doing a piece tomorrow aren't they?

Not an easy decision my friend, respect to you.

I've been going on Ewood since 1975, a ST holder for the vast majority. I've thought long and hard about whether to boycott or not. I rarely miss and it goes against the grain, but I've decided to swerve tomorrow's game. They have totally ruined our club.

I think so, registrations can only take place during a window but he’s already registered with us. Edited to add: Thats definitely the case with domestic loans, I’ll see if I can find the rules for international ones.

Its going to depend massively on the wording of the clause - it might be that the clause is an obligation to buy at a set price once 20 appearances are reached - eg. there is no clause to activate until that milestone is reached. In which case it happens when it happens, but he won't be registered as our player permanently until the opening day of the summer transfer window, I think. We'll know if he picks up an 'injury' on 19 appearances.

After 20 apps then can we still activate that clause even outside the window?

I've pretty much lost interest in watching rovers now. I'll be working tomorrow anyway

On radio lancs too but longer

Just found this regulation - could they reasonably argue the DE upper is of a higher standard than the BBE lower?? (I don’t think so):

Adam Armstrong apparently looking for new challenge. you won't get a bigger one than coming back here Adam. 😉

I don’t think the regulation allows for that argument to be made: (edited to add, needs reading in conjunction with the post below it)

Just caught it now, a rather short slot imo but something nonetheless

I spoke with Ian for at least 45 minutes, he drove to Darwen to interview others, I’m confident he didn't then ask AI to generate the article FWIW.

Exactly

Ah, nothing wrong with content but to me the way it's set out screams AI but i might be wrong.

No it's an EFL ruling too. The only way they can justify it is because the opposite end is empty. There argument would be if it was open thats what home fans would have to pay. It's ridiculous pricing.

I thought that was only really a Premier League thing i'm sure there are various clubs who have different pricing points for home and away fans in opposite ends. How do they justify £38 in an upper tier when the opposite end is empty ?

I read this one… https://smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailymail.co.uk%2Fsport%2Farticle-15491161%2FInside-Blackburn-Rovers-slow-agonising-demise-Venkys-reviled-owners-banned-local-paper-turned-fans-meddling-India-costing-Rovers-transfer-market-supporters-boycotting-Ewood-Park.html I think it’s worth noting that some of the apparently out of context quotes are actually captions for photographs…

They can't really without charging there own fans the same. We can get away with this as they are charging more in the upper tier, there isn't comparable home fan seats as we dont open the Blackburn End upper. Other clubs been doing it for years to away fans.

Why do they hate over 65's so much?

He was at a premier league club? Signed for Brondby earlier this month so won’t be returning thankfully.

Have you read the same version as me ?

Just like Emmanual Dennis last year.