booth Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 It's not real, Stuart. They are puppets. I bet you're great with the kids at Christmas, you swine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Guest Norbert Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 It's not real, Stuart. They are puppets. Are you Brian Conley? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueMonday Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 It would be constructive dismissal - where an employee has no choice but to resign after conditions have been made unworkable by an employer. Think sales director asked to do reception duty, receptionist forced to clean the loos, cleaner expected to produce a sales pipeline report. Basically, being "managed out" a little too obviously. You could argue everyone working at Rovers has a claim against Venkys then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapeTownRover Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 who doesnt own Rovers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Cool Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Are you Brian Conley? No, Les Dennis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rovers11 Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 If Shaw doesn't get sacked over the Berg issue then that's pretty obvious Venkys don't have ultimate control over Rovers. No way they would keep a person on who's cost them over £2m. The fact they haven't already sacked him is quite telling imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda's brother Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 If Shaw doesn't get sacked over the Berg issue then that's pretty obvious Venkys don't have ultimate control over Rovers. No way they would keep a person on who's cost them over £2m. The fact they haven't already sacked him is quite telling imo. unless he is the fall guy with a promise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob fleming Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 If Shaw doesn't get sacked over the Berg issue then that's pretty obvious Venkys don't have ultimate control over Rovers. No way they would keep a person on who's cost them over £2m. They kept Kean on after he lost them £30m through relegation... it must all be very confusing ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomphil Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 They kept Kean on after he lost them £30m through relegation... it must all be very confusing ... As usual stuff just doesn't add up, Apart from those who were encouraged to leave of their own accord plenty of backroom staff, coaches, people in commercial dept, stadium managers etc, admin staff and so called directors have been dismissed at the drop of a hat yet the real incompetant characters get to hang around like ringworm no matter what mess they cause. You'd have to be a real blind optimist to not think something at the root of all this is not evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LDRover Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 If you're not balls deep with the tantric fixer, you're a goner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob fleming Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 If you're not balls deep with the tantric fixer, you're a goner. It appears blatant enough to me. And still those in authority do nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapeTownRover Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 only the people who do well, get sacked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neophox Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Bowyer has managed what Appleton and Berg failed to do, get the points...end of...time to get an experienced manager in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Norbert Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 If the alternatives are Judian Ali, Gary Megson etc. then I'd keep Bowyer. If we really could get Di Matteo, Shuster or someone like that, then I'd prefer them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 If the alternatives are Judian Ali, Gary Megson etc. then I'd keep Bowyer. If we really could get Di Matteo, Shuster or someone like that, then I'd prefer them.I think this sums up most people's view, Nobby.If it doesn't then it should...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CapeTownRover Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 agree keep Bowyer if the options are jooooden or Megson, but seriously look at Di Matteo or Schuster if they are interested. I would prefer Di Matteo over Schuster though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.