aletheia Posted September 1 Posted September 1 To be fair, we had support from that quarter in the past. But of course, we know the outcome. Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Leonard Venkhater Posted September 1 Posted September 1 1 hour ago, Tyrone Shoelaces said: It’d be a sure vote winner for them - if they could be bothered. We spoke to Kate Hollern about it on one election night....I had to turn away, when she came out with the "badly advised" stuff.... 1 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted September 2 Posted September 2 Right it’s getting close to decision time. Should I set my alarm for 5am (when the court starts) or not?? 6 Quote
Popular Post arbitro Posted September 2 Popular Post Posted September 2 6 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Right it’s getting close to decision time. Should I set my alarm for 5am (when the court starts) or not?? No pressure mate but thousands are waiting for your updates. 😂 16 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted September 2 Posted September 2 1 minute ago, arbitro said: No pressure mate but thousands are waiting for your updates. 😂 Bloody hell, have things got that desperate. 😁😁 6 Quote
arbitro Posted September 2 Posted September 2 1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said: Bloody hell, have things got that desperate. 😁😁 Only good news mind. Something like life imprisonment for them. 😂 Quote
J*B Posted September 2 Posted September 2 2 hours ago, wilsdenrover said: Right it’s getting close to decision time. Should I set my alarm for 5am (when the court starts) or not?? 1 month of BRFCS ad free membership if you do! 4 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted September 2 Posted September 2 6 minutes ago, J*B said: 1 month of BRFCS ad free membership if you do! I like seeing my ads, some of them are quite saucy 😁😁 7 Quote
Popular Post wilsdenrover Posted September 3 Popular Post Posted September 3 50 minutes ago, jodrell said: Are you up?😊 Yep, up at 5, judge finally sauntered in just after 6 😁. Very short hearing: Other side hasn’t supplied copy of the complaint they’ve filed with the Adjudicating Authority. Venkys want this so they can ascertain the monetary value involved in the complaint to see if the amount of existing guarantees already covers this. Other side confirmed filing of complaint but that Adjudicating Authority are yet to respond. Judge also wants to know whether value of complaint is already covered by existing guarantees. I think it’s going to be back in court tomorrow but that could just be when the other side need to produce the copy of the complaint by. 13 Quote
Exiled_Rover Posted Wednesday at 08:37 Posted Wednesday at 08:37 3 hours ago, wilsdenrover said: Yep, up at 5, judge finally sauntered in just after 6 😁. Very short hearing: Other side hasn’t supplied copy of the complaint they’ve filed with the Adjudicating Authority. Venkys want this so they can ascertain the monetary value involved in the complaint to see if the amount of existing guarantees already covers this. Other side confirmed filing of complaint but that Adjudicating Authority are yet to respond. Judge also wants to know whether value of complaint is already covered by existing guarantees. I think it’s going to be back in court tomorrow but that could just be when the other side need to produce the copy of the complaint by. So what we've ascertained from these court proceedings over the... fuck me, years... is that the way the Venkys run our team isn't a 'them' problem. It's a cultural Indian problem. 1 Quote
CrouchingNunhiddenCucumber Posted Wednesday at 08:43 Posted Wednesday at 08:43 4 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said: So what we've ascertained from these court proceedings over the... fuck me, years... is that the way the Venkys run our team isn't a 'them' problem. It's a cultural Indian problem. Completely different world over there. In their eyes we're the serfs that threw a snow ball at them. 1 Quote
norwichblue Posted Wednesday at 10:06 Posted Wednesday at 10:06 (edited) 4 hours ago, wilsdenrover said: Yep, up at 5, judge finally sauntered in just after 6 😁. Very short hearing: Other side hasn’t supplied copy of the complaint they’ve filed with the Adjudicating Authority. Venkys want this so they can ascertain the monetary value involved in the complaint to see if the amount of existing guarantees already covers this. Other side confirmed filing of complaint but that Adjudicating Authority are yet to respond. Judge also wants to know whether value of complaint is already covered by existing guarantees. I think it’s going to be back in court tomorrow but that could just be when the other side need to produce the copy of the complaint by. Lord have mercy on us. This will still be going through the slow and painful motions this time next year won’t it. Edited Wednesday at 10:06 by norwichblue Grammar 1 Quote
oneandycrawford Posted Wednesday at 10:28 Posted Wednesday at 10:28 53 minutes ago, aletheia said: Jarndyce and Jarndyce 🙂 Well I've no Great Expectations for this season and am living in a bit of a Bleak House regarding Rovers 3 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted Wednesday at 11:21 Posted Wednesday at 11:21 Just checked and is due back in court tomorrow however listing number is yet to be published. Quote
wilsdenrover Posted Wednesday at 11:25 Posted Wednesday at 11:25 1 hour ago, norwichblue said: Lord have mercy on us. This will still be going through the slow and painful motions this time next year won’t it. I found out the other day how long the Adjudicating Authority has to make a decision but no dare not say 😬 This is before you add on all the appeals which are allowed 😬😬 In terms of this case, and based entirely on gut instinct, I think the judge might be minded to remove the guarantee condition. Quote
wilsdenrover Posted Wednesday at 11:28 Posted Wednesday at 11:28 (edited) 2 hours ago, Exiled_Rover said: So what we've ascertained from these court proceedings over the... fuck me, years... is that the way the Venkys run our team isn't a 'them' problem. It's a cultural Indian problem. It feels that way. Edited Wednesday at 11:28 by wilsdenrover 1 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted Wednesday at 14:41 Posted Wednesday at 14:41 3 hours ago, wilsdenrover said: Just checked and is due back in court tomorrow however listing number is yet to be published. There should be one of those 'Buy me a Coffee' options on here like Youtube then we can keep you in caffeine ☕ 3 Quote
miqaayil Posted Wednesday at 15:18 Posted Wednesday at 15:18 3 hours ago, wilsdenrover said: It feels that way. God bless you bro... i don't have the effing patience to even drive by an indian court .... they drag cases for decades unless political motivation. honestly if i had the dough i'll take up advertising space on THE HINDU or Times ...only way to grab attention... 1 Quote
wilsdenrover Posted Wednesday at 16:24 Posted Wednesday at 16:24 1 hour ago, Tomphil2 said: There should be one of those 'Buy me a Coffee' options on here like Youtube then we can keep you in caffeine ☕ I’ll be fine tomorrow as because (I think) it will be listed as a supplementary matter the earliest it will be heard is 10am (our time). I’ll warn everyone now though, there’s a risk I might not be in to watch it😬😬. 2 Quote
DeeCee Posted Wednesday at 17:20 Posted Wednesday at 17:20 6 hours ago, oneandycrawford said: Well I've no Great Expectations for this season and am living in a bit of a Bleak House regarding Rovers What the Dickens are you talking about? 2 Quote
Makrover Posted Wednesday at 17:44 Posted Wednesday at 17:44 Just so that I can understand the court case has been heard today and they are coming back tomorrow for the results?? Quote
KentExile Posted Wednesday at 17:48 Posted Wednesday at 17:48 1 hour ago, wilsdenrover said: ’ll warn everyone now though, there’s a risk I might not be in to watch it😬😬. Boooooo Quote
wilsdenrover Posted Wednesday at 17:53 Posted Wednesday at 17:53 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Makrover said: Just so that I can understand the court case has been heard today and they are coming back tomorrow for the results?? No. The Directorate of Enforcement were told in court last Friday to produce a copy of the complaint they’ve made to the Adjudicating Authority and a new hearing (today’s) was scheduled. Today Venkys stated they hadn’t been provided with this copy (and neither had the court). Because of this the judge rescheduled for tomorrow. Edited Wednesday at 17:56 by wilsdenrover Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.