M_B Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 13 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: He's never quitting, he seems full square on behind the "transition". Good,it won't succeed otherwise. Quote
Mattyblue Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) Do you think what Gestede et al are trying to do will succeed? Though not sure what ‘success’ is supposed to be here? Not being in the third division? Edited 8 hours ago by Mattyblue 2 Quote
superniko Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, MarkBRFC said: Anyone who plays Ryan Hedges at centre half shouldn't be taken seriously ever again. Rubbish this bloke. It’s this seasons version of “Bradley Johnson false 9” 2 Quote
roversfan99 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 3 hours ago, chaddyrovers said: As ever, you never happy with the answer. I said I posted my opinion post Derby and I did. I kept my word..TBH, its pointless cos you are never satisfied with the answer. You have ignored my question about whether you have any concerns/doubt about Ismael and whether 19th is a position you consider to be underachieving with these players, as I feel like in the past you think these players are better than that. 44 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: It's not quite in the category of putting Sam Gallagher on at RB then hooking him again 20 mins later but it's not good. What must the young CB's at the Club think when they see stuff like this happening? Wonder if they're in line for a hefty pay increase if they make a senior appearance? Gallagher played at right back for less than that, about 10 mins between making 1 sub and another sub. Hedges played at centre back for a full game. The latter was far worse. Johnson false 9 for a half was stranger than Gallagher moving for 10 minutes, but at least that weird experiment was abandonded at half time and we turned that game around. Quote
alcd Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 2 hours ago, Mattyblue said: Do you think what Gestede et al are trying to do will succeed? Though not sure what ‘success’ is supposed to be here? Not being in the third division? Cutting the losses. League status is an afterthought. 2 Quote
Mattyblue Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Definitely on track to succeed on that, bonuses all round. Edited 5 hours ago by Mattyblue Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 3 hours ago, MarkBRFC said: Don't blame him for not quitting. Easy money working for this lot when you accept anything they want you to do, and let's face it he isn't getting another gig at this level after this. I don’t blame him, I just think it says something about him. 1 Quote
MarkBRFC Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 24 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: I don’t blame him, I just think it says something about him. Absolutely, but i think we all had that idea about him anyway when he got the job. 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 5 hours ago, roversfan99 said: You have ignored my question about whether you have any concerns/doubt about Ismael and whether 19th is a position you consider to be underachieving with these players, as I feel like in the past you think these players are better than that. Yes I did ignored the question as it the similar type of question every time and we go around in circles about X or Y and we just won't agree. on the league position, we had a similar decisions and I will point to 2 games where we would have got 6 more points and you tell me I'm wrong so is worth another round of arguments/discussion over the same points again? no from me Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 38 minutes ago Posted 38 minutes ago 1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said: Yes I did ignored the question as it the similar type of question every time and we go around in circles about X or Y and we just won't agree. on the league position, we had a similar decisions and I will point to 2 games where we would have got 6 more points and you tell me I'm wrong so is worth another round of arguments/discussion over the same points again? no from me Out of interest, have there been any games this season where you thought we got more points than we deserved? Quote
Mattyblue Posted 36 minutes ago Posted 36 minutes ago Our next game is on the 21st November, so well into the season, we are sitting in 19th because we deserve to. 2 Quote
Exiled_Rover Posted 32 minutes ago Posted 32 minutes ago 5 hours ago, alcd said: Cutting the losses. League status is an afterthought. Their losses will be higher in League One. 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 15 minutes ago, wilsdenrover said: Out of interest, have there been any games this season where you thought we got more points than we deserved? Southampton could be one. But most of our wins have been deserved. Southampton one if Armstrong scores then we dont win that game 1 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 15 minutes ago Posted 15 minutes ago 8 hours ago, M_B said: Good,it won't succeed otherwise. Well, thank God they're all "aligned" or we might end up losing nearly all our home games or something. Oh errr..... hang on! What do you define as "it succeeding"? Cutting costs but going down? Cutting costs but scraping up in at best 19th? I'd define "it succeeding" as cutting costs yet still managing to maintain a similar League position to last season. Imo there isn't a snowballs chance in hell of that happening, they can be as aligned or onboard as they like. Quote
allanncd Posted 1 minute ago Posted 1 minute ago 27 minutes ago, Exiled_Rover said: Their losses will be higher in League One. Not necessarily. Wages in L1 are a fraction of even the £10k pw reportedly paid to the top 10 players at Rovers. Total wage bills at more than half of L1 clubs are below £10m compared to £25m at Rovers. Of course ambitious clubs pay more but Venkys are not that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.