Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

They missed 12:25pm - round of applause as our former manager, assistant managers, captain, and six(?) other players take to the field for the opposition having been forced out of Rovers over the last few years due to mismanagement/contract negligence.

  • Like 1
  • Backroom
Posted

It’s a ludicrously pathetic attempt isn’t it?

  • Like 2
Posted

Whole thing just reeks of unorganised chaos. 

As Rory said on 4000 holes pod, after Rovers game, if we win I wanna head out n go for a pint and a chat if we lose I wanna head out n go for a pint n a chat, I don't want to have to sit there for another 2 hours after potentially getting beaten.

I mean I want to stay, I want to stay and celebrate but. I wanna watch the game and head out. 

Just utter madness

Posted

Literally nothing that could make me stay at ewood for the rest of the day after an an embarrassing anniversary defeat to our ex manager, staff and players.

If the legends game is only a 40 minute match then get it kicked off at 10am and get folk in early for some food or a pint etc.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 hours ago, TheKitGuy said:

A 40 minute kick about. Rather watch Shearer and Sutton play heads and V's against Tim Flowers. 

20251011_170002.jpg

Is this a freebie invite or the one you have to fork out £230 for?

If i do get my invite (🙀🤣🤣🤣) it will be returned with a wee message of rejection.

Posted

For our 100th Anniversary we played a League game v Bolton.  For our 125th Anniversary we played a League game v Wolves.  For our 150th Anniversary we have a League game v Derby County + the Old Etonians game.  Not sure why the uproar about this game when the previous two anniversary games took place without comment at the time.

Posted
16 minutes ago, Parsonblue said:

For our 100th Anniversary we played a League game v Bolton.  For our 125th Anniversary we played a League game v Wolves.  For our 150th Anniversary we have a League game v Derby County + the Old Etonians game.  Not sure why the uproar about this game when the previous two anniversary games took place without comment at the time.

FWIW my take is that by tacking on a “celebratory match” of this dubious quality is symptomatic of the typically half-arsed efforts of the current regime who seem to know the price of everything & the value of nothing.

The constant tinkering of the home kit to make it look more like a Grasshoppers or Feyenoord variant, the removal of the historic timeline outside Ewood, the shockingly bad 150th merchandise…the overwhelming sense is that nobody in charge cares enough. 

A match to celebrate the 150th…against a team that actually beat us in an FA Cup final…it just feels…shoddy. 

  • Like 1
Posted

The LEAGUE match is the Anniversary game, just as the the 100th and 125th Anniversaries were League games.  The Old Etonians seems to be an added extra.  There is a book, just as there was for the 100th and 125th.  Sorry, I just don't get the outrage over this particular point.

Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, Parsonblue said:

For our 100th Anniversary we played a League game v Bolton.  For our 125th Anniversary we played a League game v Wolves.  For our 150th Anniversary we have a League game v Derby County + the Old Etonians game.  Not sure why the uproar about this game when the previous two anniversary games took place without comment at the time.

That's an odd post from you Parsons to say the least.🤔

The whole organization of this event smacks of cheap,shoddy desperation....the vast majority of fans expected better tbh.

Everyone to their own I suppose.

 

Edited by SIMON GARNERS 194
Posted
1 minute ago, chaddyrovers said:

Genuine question, what do people actually want as the 150th anniversary? 

Throughout this thread several posts have highlighted what was suggested by e.g. WATR. 

My view (again FWIW) is that (as @Parsonblue) highlighted - marking the league game closest to the anniversary is fine. Personally I think tacking on the extra match (especially in this form) is no more than paying lip-service to the idea of a celebration…it’s half-arsed.

A pre-season friendly against say Athletico Bilbao would have been a great way to kick off (!) the celebratory season. 

The book in principle sounds great…but like many on here I fear for the quality/content & independence of the editorial.

A special shirt again - sounds great, but I’ll keep my powder dry until I’ve actually seen it. 

 

In summary Chaddy - it’s less about the “what” but more about the “how” the club does things these days…

Posted
21 minutes ago, SIMON GARNERS 194 said:

That's an odd post from you Parsons to say the least.🤔

The whole organization of this event smacks of cheap,shoddy desperation....the vast majority of fans expected better tbh.

Everyone to their own I suppose.

 

Did you expect more than a League game against Bolton for the 100th Anniversary?  We've done exactly the same for this Anniversary as the 100th and 125th.  All I'm saying is what is the difference in terms of an Anniversary match.  They have all been regular League games played on or as close to 5th November as possible.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...