London blue Posted Saturday at 11:09 Posted Saturday at 11:09 2 hours ago, rigger said: We do have the option of playing three at the back, until one of the three get injured or suspended. It is a risky strategy, but it is available. If VI does choose this plan, and it is successful, happy days. If not then he will have to try another plan. I disagree. You can't expect to play a formation when you have close to zero depth in 3 positions. Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
rigger Posted Saturday at 11:16 Posted Saturday at 11:16 2 minutes ago, London blue said: I disagree. You can't expect to play a formation when you have close to zero depth in 3 positions. Explain to me why three center-halves can't be played, when we have three center-halves available. If one or more get injured or suspended, then the formation has to be changed. I am not saying it is the most favoured system with our available players. But it is playable. 1 Quote
London blue Posted Saturday at 17:21 Posted Saturday at 17:21 6 hours ago, rigger said: Explain to me why three center-halves can't be played, when we have three center-halves available. If one or more get injured or suspended, then the formation has to be changed. I am not saying it is the most favoured system with our available players. But it is playable. Sorry I mean the broader sense of 'play 3 centre backs' as in regularly. I don't think it's advisable to have all 3 senior centre backs on the pitch at any one time. Quote
rigger Posted Saturday at 17:28 Posted Saturday at 17:28 (edited) 8 minutes ago, London blue said: Sorry I mean the broader sense of 'play 3 centre backs' as in regularly. I don't think it's advisable to have all 3 senior centre backs on the pitch at any one time. 8 minutes ago, London blue said: Sorry I mean the broader sense of 'play 3 centre backs' as in regularly. I don't think it's advisable to have all 3 senior centre backs on the pitch at any one time. If it is what the manager thinks is the best formation for the players he has at his disposal, That is his decision. If a center-back becomes unavailable, you revert to a back four. Plan B's are not just for the forwards. Edited Saturday at 17:32 by rigger Quote
London blue Posted Saturday at 17:37 Posted Saturday at 17:37 Sorry mate but I thought it was generally accepted on this board that something being the managers decision doesn't automatically make it the right one? I understand that, literally speaking, playing all 3 is an option. I just don't think it's advisable, given the limited players in that position, and their respective injury records. 1 Quote
rigger Posted Saturday at 17:48 Posted Saturday at 17:48 9 minutes ago, London blue said: Sorry mate but I thought it was generally accepted on this board that something being the managers decision doesn't automatically make it the right one? I understand that, literally speaking, playing all 3 is an option. I just don't think it's advisable, given the limited players in that position, and their respective injury records. It also doesn't make it the wrong one. What it does make it, is the one we will play. Quote
London blue Posted Saturday at 17:50 Posted Saturday at 17:50 No, but in my opinion it would be. We've a difference in opinion, let's leave it there. 1 Quote
Lancaster Rover Posted Tuesday at 10:52 Posted Tuesday at 10:52 (edited) If we had kept Travis I thought 3 - box - 3 would work quite well, getting 2 10's on the pitch and using the full backs for width as we've not got much quality out wide. With the sales we've made and the personnel we have 4-2-3-1 is the most obvious choice to persevere with, although with Cantwell often dropping deep it's more of a 4-2-1-2-1 Edited yesterday at 09:31 by Lancaster Rover Quote
Ghost7 Posted Tuesday at 16:38 Posted Tuesday at 16:38 pretty poor when you're struggling to put a defence together at the very beginning of the season.... and injuries will come. We will be down there come Christmas. Quote
joey_big_nose Posted yesterday at 06:07 Posted yesterday at 06:07 Well Gudjonen exciting - first real positive of the season. I think that goal will propel him straight into the starting lineup. Id revise my team to Toth Alebiouso. Carter. Wharton. Riberio Tronstad. Cantwell Ohashi. Morishita. Hedges Gudjonsen If Carter is fit, Cantwell can play deeper, and Gudjonsen and Morishita follow through on their promise then it might actually be a decent team. Lots of ifs! But at least something to stimulate a bit of hope. Quote
KentExile Posted yesterday at 06:41 Posted yesterday at 06:41 (edited) 36 minutes ago, joey_big_nose said: Well Gudjonen exciting - first real positive of the season. I think that goal will propel him straight into the starting lineup. Id revise my team to Toth Alebiouso. Carter. Wharton. Riberio Tronstad. Cantwell Ohashi. Morishita. Hedges Gudjonsen If Carter is fit, Cantwell can play deeper, and Gudjonsen and Morishita follow through on their promise then it might actually be a decent team. Lots of ifs! But at least something to stimulate a bit of hope. I would be amazed if it did, he hasn't had one training session at Rovers yet Pressing triggers are hugely important to Ismael, which are difficult (if not impossible) to teach in a day or 2 Cameo off the bench for Gudjohnsen this weekend, and integrate him properly over the next week, rather than "hanging him out to dry" (like Henriksson on his debut) Edited yesterday at 06:44 by KentExile Quote
Lancaster Rover Posted yesterday at 09:33 Posted yesterday at 09:33 I think the lack of reacting to pressing triggers are the main reason Gueye is out in the cold with VI, Ohashi is incredibly diligent when it comes to his off the ball duties which is one of the main reasons I think he's been preferred thus far, that and Gueye couldn't hit a barn door Quote
arbitro Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Herbie6590 said: These are £76 for adults and £60 for kids. Pasha will be salivating already. Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 22 hours ago Posted 22 hours ago Where is our official Doctor Who themed kit in honour of our most famous celeb fan ? Or maybe a one off Max Farnham edition ( for those who remember ) Missing a trick here Macron ! Quote
bluebruce Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago On 06/09/2025 at 18:28, rigger said: If it is what the manager thinks is the best formation for the players he has at his disposal, That is his decision. If a center-back becomes unavailable, you revert to a back four. Plan B's are not just for the forwards. If the manager believes 3 CBs is the best formation for us, why would he allow us to end up with only 4 CBs in the squad, two of whom are highly injury prone? 1 Quote
rigger Posted 21 hours ago Posted 21 hours ago 11 minutes ago, bluebruce said: If the manager believes 3 CBs is the best formation for us, why would he allow us to end up with only 4 CBs in the squad, two of whom are highly injury prone? That has nothing to do with the discussion, which has now been closed. 1 Quote
aletheia Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 9 hours ago, KentExile said: Pressing triggers are hugely important to Ismael, Interesting you say that. It seemed to me that during the last home game there wasn't much of one -just tended to drop to half way. Also, it seemed a little half-hearted but definitely improved in the second half as did energy levels. 1 Quote
Moptop1 Posted 18 hours ago Posted 18 hours ago 3 hours ago, Tomphil2 said: Where is our official Doctor Who themed kit in honour of our most famous celeb fan ? Or maybe a one off Max Farnham edition ( for those who remember ) Missing a trick here Macron ! Knowing our owners, they’ll probably make our 150th anniversary shirt in claret and blue. 🙄 1 Quote
Norbert Rassragr Posted 17 hours ago Posted 17 hours ago 4 hours ago, Tomphil2 said: Where is our official Doctor Who themed kit in honour of our most famous celeb fan ? Or maybe a one off Max Farnham edition ( for those who remember ) Missing a trick here Macron ! Or a Bullseye themed shirt. 1 Quote
Herbie6590 Posted 17 hours ago Author Posted 17 hours ago Always enjoy my chats with DNSYE podcast… FF to the last 20 minutes or so… 1 Quote
RoversTilliDie Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 01/09/2025 at 08:04, OnionBalaji said: Predicting a first draw of the season: 1-1 Would like Gueye to start to tire out the defence a little bit then bring on ohashi or Gudjohnsen. With morishita deliveries would be great to have a big lad up front who can get his head on them…. Big Mak has been capable Sorry for heated words after the Norwich game, I was yellow carded. If Gudjohnsen can score against France, he should score a few against Championship teams. I'm sticking my neck out on this one, 1-2 to Rovers Gudjohnsen on the scoresheet. Quote
RoversTilliDie Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago It was a big mistake selling Dominic Hyam on the last day of the transfer window. He would have stayed for the season, but we would have had nothing for him on a free. Let's hope we've players in the squad to fill his boots. Quote
RoversTilliDie Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 04/09/2025 at 13:46, SIMON GARNERS 194 said: Andy Bayes: "For a team that ended last season just outside of the play-off spots, the hope from the fanbase was to make some key additions over the summer to supplement what they already had could see another realistic top-six push." ...We've been basically stripped bare instead.I hate these b'stards killing our Club with a passion. Going for 1-1 at best here,its like we are starting with a new side(all be it weaker)and its going to take time to gel. It's another rebuilding job, and getting the newcomers to click as a team. We could do with another Jack Walker to build a strength in depth squad. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.