Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, JHRover said:

The fact that Rovers have had to move with speed to prepare and release a substantial club statement late on a Friday evening in mid-October, the night before a game, and 3 weeks before date in question, following one person posting this on twitter, just shows where we are at as a club.

Something that would be utterly inconceivable at any other professional club, here is believable and so much so that one post on twitter snowballs into something massive and forces the club to respond like this. 

That is purely because the club cannot be trusted and no story, no matter how ridiculous or extreme it might appear, can be ruled out at Ewood Park these days.

The club is of course a mess, but this is a strange stick to beat them with. What it shows is how quickly jingoistic lies spread on the Internet these days. In the current climate this sort of thing could spread quickly at any club and need putting down. The club have acted quickly to quash it, and that's the right move. They're not to blame, whichever pillock fabricated this is.

  • Like 4
  • Fair point 2
Posted
7 hours ago, ... said:

@Herbie6590crossing over threads slightly. Does this read into which kit a little more perhaps? Would they play in a commemorative shirt with the poppy on it?

Screenshot_20251017_234814_Chrome.jpg

My understanding (from the meeting with Fraser back in April 24) was that the anniversary shirt would be worn in the commemorative game much like the 125 one was against Wolves in 2000.

I do wonder if the calendar has rather taken them by surprise & so we may well have player anniversary shirts with a poppy & fan anniversary shirts without. 

Either way, I won’t be buying one…I’m extremely fond of my 1950’s shirt 😉

 

  • Fair point 1
Posted

This bollocks will have been deliberately spread out there by those in power to find leaks and to try and make the fans look like mugs. Heavens forbid they should put the same amount of energy into just doing a moderately competent job running the club.

The fact that this was believable says everything really.

  • Fair point 1
Posted
On 18/10/2025 at 07:44, arbitro said:

This is social media at its worst.

An unsubstantiated rumour about such an emotive subject has quickly been dispelled by the club and the originator should hang his head in shame.

I agree.

There is an added problem in that it is so important to ensure that our fanbase can not be re-defined by Suhail/Rudi et al, as misrepresenting the situation at the club.

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, Leonard Venkhater said:

I agree.

There is an added problem in that it is so important to ensure that our fanbase can not be re-defined by Suhail/Rudi et al, as misrepresenting the situation at the club.

Yes Leonard there are enough sticks to beat this lot with without making things up.

Posted

I’m not sure anything was made up.

Make a monumental fuckup, big backlash, quickly change plans, deny and pretend it never happened. That’s the Rovers way.

  • Like 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Miller11 said:

I’m not sure anything was made up.

Make a monumental fuckup, big backlash, quickly change plans, deny and pretend it never happened. That’s the Rovers way.

This was my first thought when the statement by the Rovers was made. I don't know who to believe.

Posted
2 hours ago, Miller11 said:

I’m not sure anything was made up.

Make a monumental fuckup, big backlash, quickly change plans, deny and pretend it never happened. That’s the Rovers way.

I’m with @arbitroon this…the speed of the “about turn” suggests it was anything but, this was a false rumour that was quickly deleted by its originator. 
If you had revealed something so awful that made the club change its mind - why then delete your post? 
Wouldn’t you instead claim the victory? 
“my reveal made them think again…” ? 🤔

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...