Waggy76 Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, RTM08 said: As the Ipswich game is showing, it doesn't matter if we spend or not because they recruitment team because they haven't the slightest clue what to look for in a player. Until they're gone it makes no difference. Very true ,their judgement of a footballer is shocking ! Quote
Backroom Tom Posted 3 hours ago Backroom Posted 3 hours ago We should be checking the terms and conditions on Cashin, he’s awful 7 Quote
KentExile Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 22 minutes ago, Tom said: We should be checking the terms and conditions on Cashin, he’s awful He has to play, otherwise Rovers get a bill that they are not willing to pay Feel sorry for Pratt 2 Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago In this window can we replace the manager if so I’d start there 4 Quote
Popular Post RevidgeBlue Posted 2 hours ago Popular Post Posted 2 hours ago 31 minutes ago, KentExile said: He has to play, otherwise Rovers get a bill that they are not willing to pay Feel sorry for Pratt As I said in the matchday thread quintessentially Venky's Rovers. Academy Lad drafted in as an absolute last resort after failing with Hedges at LWB. Academy lad absolutely excels - doesnt let us down once. Promptly binned off because another Club wants one of their players to get some minutes. Said loanee comes in, scores the most needless own goal of own time and basically looks like he's never seen a football pitch before. However we're obliged to play him otherwise we face penalty clauses. 15 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago Lad steps up from academy, no commission for an agent or their pals. Guy signed on loan for a modest wage contribution and maybe a loan fee, agent gets commission. There is no other sense in it other than that by bringing in that guy to play above Pratt. Their is a budget and they are finding ways to spend it and get their %. 2 Quote
Bbrovers2288 Posted 54 minutes ago Posted 54 minutes ago We all knew we were under the cosh with injuries and last minute player sales, we all knew we had to get bodies in very quickly once January starts, we are sitting with 2 dubious transfers on January 17th. Writing is on the wall, the gamble of gestede hasn’t worked out like we all knew and we are done for. I can’t even get angry anymore , it’s laughable how it’s all happened and been allowed to happen. Football is dead to me Quote
Mashed Potatoes Posted 31 minutes ago Posted 31 minutes ago 2 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said: As I said in the matchday thread quintessentially Venky's Rovers. Academy Lad drafted in as an absolute last resort after failing with Hedges at LWB. Academy lad absolutely excels - doesnt let us down once. Promptly binned off because another Club wants one of their players to get some minutes. Said loanee comes in, scores the most needless own goal of own time and basically looks like he's never seen a football pitch before. However we're obliged to play him otherwise we face penalty clauses. Has it been reported that we face penalty clauses ? Quote
Backroom DE. Posted 16 minutes ago Backroom Posted 16 minutes ago 16 minutes ago, Wegerleswiggle said: Ok, but where's Donnum's Lambo? Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 16 minutes ago Posted 16 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Mashed Potatoes said: Has it been reported that we face penalty clauses ? Lol. Go on I'll bite. It's widely reported that Brighton are picking up most if not all his wages in return for guaranteed game time. Were he not to get that game time it's reasonable to assume we'd have to pay more towards his wages. Whether you term it as a "penalty clause" or a gentleman's agreement. Quote
JHRover Posted 14 minutes ago Posted 14 minutes ago Wolfsburg interest in Ryan might explain the source of funds for Jorgensen. Or perhaps the money they got from bundling Hyam out on deadline day which the Venky happy clappers have forgotten all about. Quote
Mashed Potatoes Posted 9 minutes ago Posted 9 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: Lol. Go on I'll bite. It's widely reported that Brighton are picking up most if not all his wages in return for guaranteed game time. Were he not to get that game time it's reasonable to assume we'd have to pay more towards his wages. Whether you term it as a "penalty clause" or a gentleman's agreement. You may well be right - I don't know - but who has actually "reported" this ? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.