Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have always thought that waiting  until the end of a sale period and picking up a piece of soiled tat that everyone has pored over and left their grubby fingerprints on that you can’t take back but got at a good price is a good strategy.

Er…No. 

  • Like 3
  • Fair point 1
Posted

If not signing anyone meant relegation then venkys suhail gestede and Ismael and all those bastards fucked off, I'd take not signing anyone 

  • Like 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, roverandout said:

If not signing anyone meant relegation then venkys suhail gestede and Ismael and all those bastards fucked off, I'd take not signing anyone 

Unfortunately, it wouldn't.

  • Like 3
Posted

Shades of the last relegation season when we needed defenders and all they delivered was a striker on loan that just happened to be on the books of the agent wife of the useless low grade DoF they appointed that season as the fall guy.

Red flags are flying.

Posted
2 hours ago, StHelensRover said:

I always enjoy the 4000 holes podcast! I agree with about 95% of the stuff I hear on there too. But I must dissent on this one.

If we were signing him from anyone, I'd be quite concerned. He's about 50, he's unfit or lacking sharpness, he was no good at Norwich most recently. He's finished basically.

The fact we'd be signing him from a club who worships him for calling us 'bastards' on telly and smashing our goalie over would be the icing on the cake. Imagine what it would say on the plane they fly over when we go down and he's scored 2 goals.

It was a little tongue in cheek shall we say…I expected an avalanche of vitriol but perhaps its a sign of how exhausted we all are that I received none…😉

  • Fair point 1
Posted

Ismael is saying the injury to presumably Reyes Cleary is why they are having to move on. 

Comical stuff. Come off it! I'm not sure why he's so complicit in what the club are doing.

Cleary is expected to be fit to start his sides next game and was taken off as a precaution. This is a fact from his manager. More nonsense from our side.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ghost7 said:

Ismael is saying the injury to presumably Reyes Cleary is why they are having to move on. 

Comical stuff. Come off it! I'm not sure why he's so complicit in what the club are doing.

Cleary is expected to be fit to start his sides next game and was taken off as a precaution. This is a fact from his manager. More nonsense from our side.

Must be Mateta or Ollie Watkins we're after, don't worry.

Posted

Don’t think Ismael was referring to Cleary about the injured target.

Afolayan did well at Bolton. Pretty underwhelming signing though. Not expecting much but he may surprise.

Posted
7 hours ago, Mercer said:

So Nicko talking about bizarre!

Heard something quite bizarre earlier in the week about a Rovers' enquiry for a striker.  Asked the source if he was taking the p1ss and he said not 

I could not see the club loaning/selling, I could not see the player wanting to come and I certainly could not see Rovers paying fee and / or wages necessary.

Don't shoot the messenger.

Player Ellis Simms.

 

25 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said:

Thomas-Asante banned 3 games meaning Ellis not that I once thought it was true or logical won’t be going anywhere - can add that source mercer to the dud list 

Perspective called for.

Please read my post carefully.

I stated three personal 'could not sees' and using Nicko's adjective, found it bizarre Rovers should make an enquiry.  If you were aware of the source then I feel you would agree it was very likely an enquiry, for whatever reason, was made 

Posted
4 hours ago, BankEnd Rover said:

Could be bizarre as to why we're going back for him - plus his age isn't great and doesn't fit the resale value.

Probably just a loan. 

Posted
4 hours ago, Torgeir said:

He was on my 'shortlist' initially but he has a bit of experience so decided it had to be someone else. And not that bizarre? But a bit of a mehhhhh signing for me.

He hasn't played for 3 months so it would be March before he would be likely to start. We'll be as good as down by then. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Mercer said:

 

Perspective called for.

Please read my post carefully.

I stated three personal 'could not sees' and using Nicko's adjective, found it bizarre Rovers should make an enquiry.  If you were aware of the source then I feel you would agree it was very likely an enquiry, for whatever reason, was made 

I read your post carefully - no slight on you more on your source as stated - I simply don’t believe we have enquired on Ellis Simms  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...