That's the usual, they print what the club ask them to.

There is almost certainly still no budget, so deals like this, are likely to be the norm, this summer. Probably Fleck next on similar terms.

With all that money in, plus the Raya money, the Wharton money and £20M from the owners, perhaps we are going to spend £50m on a new team and give promotion a real go

Carter may well be sold.

Almost enough to put me off watching

He is based in Mellor when he is needed locally and that came form the horses mouth.

I tend to agree with the bulk of that. Suhail has a more active role than what appears to the casual observer and he is the key. If he was closes to retirement age, then we may see a different scenario, so the only hope now is that the cannot fund us any more. It could take a year or two after that, as there are still some saleable assets, but a permanent ban on funding and it is effectively game over.

Negligent is probably too tame a word to use to describe their ownership. It is bordering on criminal and very appropriate that they are having to go to court for permission to carry on, so to speak.

Thanks for letting me. the site know. I wasn't sure if it was genuine or not, hence me posting the actual link.

Szmods.pdf

Rumours on Twitter that Szmodics is being touted by Wolves and a fee of £13m is mentioned.

So someone’s been stealing your points? I hope it’s those thieves in India and they have transferred them to the league table for the up coming season. We will need them I think.

If he comes back from India knowing the budget and having also had an audience with the owners, perhaps an interview would be appropriate. He might even have something to say about his links to Kentaro, if some asks him.

The Lancashire Telegraph do as they are told by the club. We have seen examples in the past of them accidentally leaving in, references that show they need permission to print certain articles.

Do you think he has been stretching the truth again?

Anyone will do, as the real person at the helm is Suhail.

So, given your second paragraph, do you consider Jackson to be accurate or inaccurate normally, with what he reports?

Exactly. So either that was untrue, or here we have the proof, unless of course, someone provides evidence that a further ruling was made in March overturning the ban.

My proof is down to knowing that the previous statement banning them form sending funds, has not been overturned. If it has then proof is needed, if it hasn't then what was in place still stands, no irony, purely fact.

He seems to want to have it both ways. How can Venky's not being allowed to send funds overseas, not have an impact on Rovers? He has then stated that they can still send funds overseas and despite me proving that Waggott has lied, about there being no impediment still chooses not to accept that.

I haven't got any evidence, but neither have you. You have stated that the court made a new ruling in March. Prove it. Would you accept that what Waggott said about needing permission for the 2 tranches to be sent last year existed, as I wasn't at the court hearing, but he stated that. He has never stated that there was a decision made on the funding changing in March, it was simply reported that it was adjourned. He states that a precedent has been set, so expects the funding to be agreed again in August. He has NEVER stated that anything has changed in either of the adjourned hearing in 2024.

Would you like to provide evidence of the agreements that were made in March please? These do not exist, so either show people on here that they do, or accept that the hearing in August is for permission to be given to start funding again.

The issues never related to Rovers and nothing has changed. The CANNOT send funds now 100%.

I agree with that statement, but of course it does affect Rovers. Let's face it, if they are banned from sending funds forever, then it is game over. This is exactly why I have stated that Waggott's statement is cleverly worded. The hearing itself has nothing to do with Rovers, but the outcome could have a catastrophic impact on the very future of the club.

The court hearing is set for 21/08/2024. Assuming no further adjournment, the court will decide if further funds can be released or not. If they agree that funds can be released, then hopefully it means, they no longer need to keep on going to court and getting future permissions. In my opinion, the reason for a gap of 7 months between the original court date in January and the August meeting, is to investigate fully, what has been going on with regards to the funding of the club and how VLL is structured. My hope is that they will uncover some of the mystery surrounding the original takeover and some of the strange goings on ever since. That in turn I hope leads to them being denied the permission for further funding and that ultimately leads to them being forced to sell.