Well, it is a football message board!

Well, to be fair, I was also worried about Graham at the start of last season-maybe before. At the start of last season, my -albeit unprofessional-judgement was that he was looking lethargic and overweight. In fact, we even had a joke about him being like Elvis at the end! I confess!

See Haha!

Haha...But that is not how he said it/meant it . It was an attempt to to justify the unjustifiable and to normalise the business of Blackburn employees awaiting the glacial speed of decisions in India..

Play Reach for my revolver Bingo... Naive Badly advised Learned their lessons.... ...and my own personal favourite (from Bob Coar) Just the same as when Jack was here

But.... Lord Dyche... lol... Bless!

We don't...

At Rovers, I hope...

100%.. This frustrates the hell out of me-along with the lack of advertising/sponsorship over the last few years. It was if they just couldn't be arsed. Then to play the FFP card.. Well it just won't wash... Again, you have to wonder why...

On Good Friday and Ash Wednesday?

Ah sponsorless shirts! Now I am sure Venky's actually allowed Rovers to start one season without a shirt sponsor being sorted. Maybe, a sponsorless shirt could be worn like sack cloth, as a reminder of the wilful neglect of our club?

It would make me want to dig out an old shirt and get KFC printed on it....but then again, you probably knew that!

Actually, I think he played a blinder in the first part.

If you don't like people's posts, don't read them. No need trawl for allies and gang up on other posters!

?

He'd be a fool to do that. I don't know if there is a way he can give a verbal message to satisfy us without showing his hand to potential sellers. Maybe, we will have to reserve judgement until we see action. I wonder whether there will be enough "action" before the early bird deadline on 16 June.. Won't get fooled again.......well maybe not...

Some might think that penance will last 60 years...not enough either!

As in "Who are Accrington Stanley?"

I am sure a large rake off went to partners(joint owners?)...Do we think other partners merely allow their accomplices to keep all of this...or would there be some kind of split..?

I guess that is my point. Bad advice implies something too external. I find myself wondering if much of the so called outgoings/expenses etc ( percentage of transfer fees, signing on fees, salary from lengthy contracts, pay offs )are in fact payments to the "ownership" and not loss, as conveniently depicted. I may have watched too many westerns, but I have a picture of the robbers meeting up in the hills and divvying up the proceeds!

But agents were/are partners in running the club. Also a large slice of player wages, signing on fees-and indeed managerial pay offs-went to said partners. To think I once wondered why there were so many strange signings

Well said....And instead of a consultant, enter a clown....(followed by another and another..)

..except.....