chaddyrovers

I was a similar question 2 days whether a new owners and I said Yes. I have more than crystal clear, open and honest on my position on attending games home and away, club shop, etc. Wasnt I clear enough? Also I have been clear, open and honest, that anyone who has decide to not attend games or take NAPM stance, as my respect and I wont be moaning or Slagging them off. At the end of the day, this is a personal choice for everyone. I have said what my position is. You haven't posted as far as I see what your position is, whether you will still attend home games including the Watford game, whether you spend on the concourse or in the club shop? So what is your position, would you post it please?!1 That's again is my opinion that might be what happens or even Venkys bring someone else in with a new CEO appointment. The Coar thing was something said on a podcast by Glen Mullan running the club when Pasha wasn't around.

I was asked for my opinion on a number of things from @roversfan99 like @M_Bwas from the same post and I answered his questions.

When did I say he was the best thing since sliced bread? Another one who goes OTT and used words no-one has said to suit yourself

What are you going on about again. Ive been more than open and honest with my stance whilst respecting yours whilst you dont with mine and others who will choose to attend games, vack the players and club, etc. Will it tho? How would we know? That's your opinion. We lost 15k STH and nothing changed, why now?.

I was asked my opinion and gave it. You have protests every game post match at the start, meetings with the FA, EFL, PL and the Sports minister, 15k STH walk away, relegation from the PL and even the Championship to League 1, offers to buy the club supposedly a few times, yet they are still here. So no I dont have the magical answers, do you?

How much is being the reduction given people have ST and most walk.ons will have already purchase their tickets for Saturday game?

On the NAPM stance, that's a personal choice and each person will decide what they want to do. I will my own decisions on that. I respect people making their own decisions on attending games or not. Its not easy choice but it's a personal one I dont think much will change personally with owners over this stance/letter from the coalition. Venkys have shown they are very stubborn people and dont like being told what to do. I dont see that. I can see them appointing a CEO very soon with Pasha staying in India. That wouldn't surprise me

This is a personal choice Penwortham Blue and I have made my choice and I won't be changing. I will be supporting the players and the team home and away including the Watford home game. support the Watford Boycott? if you don't want to attend the game and boycott it that is your choice.

I know I said I wouldn't comment yesterday but feel very strongly that this need pointing. We are all Rovers fans and we all have our positions on the range of the issues. I will say this, no-one SHOULD be slamming or calling anyone they are Venkys side cos they want to still attend games and back the players and the team. Just to be very clear and straight, I will be attending games and backing the players and the team. I want to win games and I want to support my club and I don't want to go down to League 1. That's my choice and if others are doing the same, then they SHOULDN'T BE slagged off and moaned at for doing so. This is a personal choice. Now if people want to not attend games and have NAPM stance then that's is their personal choice equally they shouldn't be moaned at either. I could see Venkys appointing a new CEO prompt and taking Pasha out of the firing line for abit

same old RF99 response, refusing to answer a simple straight forward question. If you can't answer it, please don't expect me to your questions. Over the top comments like a roaring success or Ismael is the new messiah which no-one even mentioned apart from YOU! This is what you repeatably do, nowhere I have said either comment but you have chosen to used that which and lied about what I said

You are wrong here, I repeatably slammed Mowbray for being stubborn over sticking with 3-4-3 false 9 formation and if memory served me right, YOU ACTUALLY back Mowbray not me. He changed formation too late and cost us a playoff place, no-one said it has been roaring success which are your words not mine but changing formations has got us wins, that's what we wanted Its was very simple and straight forward question, but instead we get this and that excuses instead of actually answering the question

So what would you do now? Change formation now back to 4-2-3-1 formation or stick to 3-5-2?

What a great open game Utd Bournemouth was. Perfect for neutral

Is this a serious question? So you wont be attending then or aren't a STH then? No respect for fans who want to back the players and team?

So he should have stubborn and stick to 4-2-3-1 formation and ignore getting results. Playing 3 at back got us results I would move back to 4 at back for Saturday game.

But are they players knocking the door down saying to McCullum and Stokes to play me? Who are the openers/number 3 put pressure on them saying pick me? Are Emillo Gay or Ben McKinney or Tom Haines ready to Replace Crawley or Duckett? Is Bethall ready to bat 3 and replace Pope? Should Smith bat 3 and not keeper with someone like James Rew at 6 or 7 with Jacks replacing Stokes long term as all round? Pope should have been dropped for this test for me

because wrote us off last season when we played them and last season when we played them, we weren't in great form last season, similar to this one yet we played very well, scored some good goals and I hope we can similar on Saturday where I will be there supporting the players and the team

You thought we would get bullied at PNE and lose, but we didn't did we. We beaten teams like Hull, Leicester, Bristol City, Southampton this season. I will always back my team and the players 🔵⚪

sometimes that happens in order to get result. maybe he should have stubborn and stuck to 4-2-3-1 and not change like some previous head coaches have done

You could say that for Crawley, Duckett and Pope, but who is knocking on the door in county cricket? who are the openers/top order batsmen challenging those 3? I think this bit is where people misunderstand what Stokes and McCullum actually want changing it all again isn't what we need but I think keeping Key and McCullum would be wise and sensible move, with maybe Brook becoming Test captain would be way forward

sometimes you needed to change formation and pick up results. The squad was built for 4-2-3-1 formation and that changes results in good away wins.

@roversfan99 and @sharpysharps86 Don't you seriously think I don't what last season team was and this season team then you clearly don't know myself as poster then

We will win this. We played last season and won 4-1 which was our best performance under Ismael last season. I would change to 4-2-3-1 personally but I dont expect Ismael to do so. Expect either TGH or Morishita at right wing back. Hopefully Toth and Hedges will be back for this

I hope not but it does feel like this team will need a revamp after the Ashes Maybe a new opening batter to replace Crawley, maybe a new number 3 unless Stokes goes there, find a spinner that the Captain and Head coach, new pace bowlers. Plus the future of Stokes as Captain and McCullum as head coach.

only 1 change FFS. Tongue for Atkinson. We have backed Bashir for 3 years and said he would be number 1 spinner in the ashes, now not playing. I would have drop Pope for Bashir and Potts for Carse