chaddyrovers

FFS

I did 2 shortlist of 5 names which was my choices. Then only pick 1 name from HSH sports Agency. Mark Robins is the only choice from them..

Oh right. You might like my shortlist of replacements

Hes a striker by trade. He scores goals when he plays there. His best performances comes from that position like Bristol city away or Preston away last season. I said on Thursday we need a new manager if we want promotion which I want. Plus discuss my shortlist in the appropriate threads.

I was always in reality Mercer. We just had different opinions. Surprise you didnt to my posts in the Mowbray thread and my shortlist in the Mowbray's successor.

Nope. Just wish he would play Gallagher upfront or on bench. His best performances come when he is up front. And goals aswell

He should be if he thinks this squad is top 6. He has been told about fans opinions in my opinion Mowbray has wrecked him by playing him wide for pass 18 months. He scores when he plays up front like Preston away, Stoke away, Luton away.

Gallagher is a striker. He either plays there or on bench. When will Mowbray learn

Armstrong to score and Rovers to win 1 nil.

Supposedly the Academy site is bigger according to this Also if Waggott is retiring at the end of the season will.the new CEO overseas the new plans.

Andy Bayes on BBC Radio Lancs saying that Rovers squad isn't top 6 quality despite Mowbray's comments. Also said that Mowbray would have had toughness times if fans were in the stadium currently. Very honest comments from him

Coventry beat Brentford 2 nil. Robins got his tactics spot on against them. Can't stand Thomas Frank at all. Raya should have saved the Penalty from Tyler Walker

Mark Robins?

no Grabban for Forest

More changes than needed to be Tony and another change of formation. Is it 4-4-2 or 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1? Who knows? If he is playing Gallagher wide then he is wrong again for doing so. Why not play Dolan there? Fell for Gallagher cos He would be useful as a striker but he isn't wide forward. All 4 man centre defenders out. crazy. Armstrong has captain. Probably down to his performances. Hopefully he scores and win. Yes when he first came in here as manager here we played 4-4-2 then we changed to 3-4-2-1 formation.

I have missed watching our 23's and 18's teams. Enjoyed watching them.

So either 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1

Rovers won 2-1

I'm annoyed at the lack of communication from the club before the applications went in. Why not communicate the plans to us 1st? Plus I want to see the digital plans of the new training facility. Plus answers to my questions. Yes it would be great to have state of art modern training facility with us keeping category one academy status as well improve in all training facilities we need in football and have one of the facilities in.the football worls. No problem but just be open and honest with us. If they have done that then we would be less angry and annoyed with them. Is that too much to ask for from the club? Dont know

That's my point. You would have thought.. I look forward to seeing the digital building plans and video on our new state of the art training facility in the future.

The club should have release the plans themselves not have us finding out like this. They could have done interviews with media and show their digital building blueprints for new training facility online. Just want them to be open and honest with us

Asked Sharpe why is the academy site more suitable than senior training centre? His answer was privacy and also bigger area

Dont we owned the academy training ground?

The club should have release a statement and done interviews with local media to explain what the club wanted to do with the training ground and redeveloping it. They should be open and honest with fan base. Instead we found out through a fan. Simply not good enough from the club. If the plan is put all under one facility then fine. Makes sense. But why is the senior training centre being sold, surely that is where the new training centre should be. So why is academy training ground more suitable? Waggott and club need to explain further what the plans are with digital images of the new training ground and a guarantee that Rovers will maintain our category one status Academy. Waggott and Rovers should have released all the details before the application went in to Ribble valley council. Poor from them. Questions I like to ask 1. cost of redevelopment? 2. how long will it take redevelopment the site for all in one training centre? 3. Where are digital building plans of the new training centre?. 4. Will we retain our category one academy status in the new facility? 5. How many training pitches will each team have? Will we have latest in quality of pitches? 6. What state of the art facilities will be in the new facility? 7. Will fans still have access to watch under 18 games?