rigger

It is probably something to do with the small capacity at Bournemouth. Supply and demand.

Keith Newton.

I remember going into Mercers for a suit.

Twelve inches.

For me both merit red cards.

But it does reflect that standard

By the present rules it is a red. At no point have I said that I agree with the rules. The fact that he missed the Wednesday player, does not take away from the fact that it was dangerous.

As well as late, mis-timed, dangerous and out of control, it was from behind, so ticks most boxes for a red card.

I thought the tackle for the sending off, was mis-timed, dangerous and out of control. A red card, by the rules. If you listen to debates in rugby league VAR, one of the things they say straight away is, what do the rules say. If a player breaks the rules he is punished in accordance with what is laid down in the rules. Funnily enough the player usually accepts the decission.

Im glad you agree

The fact that the history of our football clubs go back further than 1992.

Bad grammer doesn't alter the facts.

A warning for the Rovers.

And their fans are a bunch of bastards.

I suggest you read Norberts post again, more carefully this time.

Sheff Utd fan

And white pudding.

Or his brother, Dog.

Europeans have mayonaisse on theirs ?

Coventry weren't a force last season, we blew it.

Has JDT left yet

It's a dead cert.

But I bet the figures were taken from earlier that day. Or even before that. But whatever, the figures will be out of date, when they are released.

You are right. If they are published next friday it will be 11 days, so less than two weeks out of date. But it doesn't really matter when the figures are released. It matters what the figures are.

No, but you could well be.