You can find all the gems in the world but if you've no budget you're not buying them. Of the signings under GB I'd say Szmodics is absolutely a success, yes he wasn't an unknown, but who else took a punt? Hyam is decent although his form has dipped and Tronstad and Siggy look reasonable. However GB's most important work has been sorting out most of the contract situations.

Alternatively as soon as the article page loads, click the x (the one which becomes the refresh button) to stop it loading further. This stops everything beyond the first paragraph from being hidden.

I'm sure it's been said there's a one year extension option as well, so he only goes for free if the club decide to release him, like Dack. The difference with Gally is I think JDT wants to play him, he generally does when he is fit.

JPvH and Reed were loans, they pretty much had to leave. Nyambe, Lenihan, Rothwell, BBD and King went as their contracts expired - another issue which has been discussed endlessly. Rhodes was desperate to leave and I believe we got 8m, so hardly peanuts.

JDT also said Travis wanted to leave in the summer and expressed the same wish again in October, as he wanted to play more in the role he wanted. Had Trav not wanted to move, it's difficult to say what may have happened. We all know our finances are tight but even if they're not, do you keep one of your higher earners around if they're not a key part of the team, not just the squad? If the 2 loans were possible due to him leaving, we've got more cover now than before he went. Time will tell if they're better options for the team as a whole, compared to if we'd have kept him around.

Fully agree, there are different ways to solve a problem. Look at Cambridge's goals - neither in my view were the fault of the keeper. First one we failed to clear our lines 3 times and nobody got out to block the shot. 2nd goal the cross could be stopped, Pik easily beaten and worst of all the striker had no defender within 5 yards, the CBs were literally marking nobody. There's been many times in the past where we've seen players literally throwing themselves in the way to block shots. We seem to be lacking some of that mentality when defending our box at the moment

When Alan Nixon links Wharton away, it's usually met with a number of comments about how he knows nothing. He links Ennis away, which people wouldn't be too bothered about, and I don't think I've seen a single comment about how hopeless Nixon is.

If he's not given the option of experienced players as we can't afford them what is he supposed to do, decline all suggestions? Or if he wants numbers as the squad is thin, choose one experienced incoming over 2/3 players? It's likely not as simple as this but yesterday we lost a squad player on one of the higher wages and brought in 2 squad players to cover the same position as well as other midfielder roles, and cover at left back where we didn't have it (as Batty hasn't been deemed good enough for a look in). If Gally was fit and someone offered to loan him and it enabled is to bring in a pacey winger and another striker, I imagine there'd be a fair few willing to take the punt. Yet, when fit, I reckon Gally is closer to starting games compared to where Trav was.

Would have been a bold move to take the captaincy off trav and give it to a new signing in his first summer. If you mean last summer, that would probably have put Trav's nose out of joint even more. He already wanted to go, it hardly convinces him to stay if the armband is taken off him.

JDT on the captain's armband: "Dom Hyam will take over as captain and Sam Szmodics as vice-captain. Two lads who have been playing at a high level and always put the team first." Too much to read into this that Trav wasn't putting the team first anymore? Either way I don't think many would have put him in the team ahead of Wharton and Tronstad. Yes you need depth and back up, but Trav clearly didn't want to bide his time.

Should we have kept an unhappy player and one who didn't like that he wasn't preferred for the holding role?

Whilst more of a reflection of the club, still one of the higher transfer fees we've received in recent seasons

Jackson tweeted it was planned, and indicated no injury concerns from the match across the team.

From the glimpses of him we've had, I think Ennis has decent movement and can play a hold up role as well. However, I'm reserving full judgement for 12 months. Brittain has shown how having a year of working under this coaching group and then having the necessary pre season can allow a completely different player to come through in year 2.

No of course not. But it's one thing your agent saying club x and y would pay x amount, and another where players from half a dozen or more prem clubs tell you that you could be on however many times more just for being in the development squad at the big clubs.

The concern would be if there's a release clause, even at £20m+ it's small pennies for most prem clubs. On the other hand, it'll reduce the likelihood of him thinking he should leave for better money now we've presumably increased his wage. One draw back of him playing for Eng is if players at prem clubs are telling him how much more he could be getting elsewhere

If GB is to be believed, they met the valuation we placed on him, having initially put in a bid that was quickly dismissed.

More of a reason was he wanted to leave. Had the chance to go to the top division. For anyone who suggests we should just reject all bids and keep him, not only does it mean an unhappy player but probably squad. Nobody would renew without a release clause if they thought the club would prevent them going up a division

I hope the clauses for Raya to Arsenal have all been met and are binding after that howler

Cost cutting most likely was a factor but you don't think he wanted game time and therefore also wanted the loan? He'd barely made a match day squad in the league.

Try emailing or giving the store/mail order dept a call. Would have expected this to be back on 'standard' sale.

Go on the Rovers site, under Fans then Fans Forum. All the minutes are published there and you can read past ones if so inclined.

A moment after contact but yes it was clearly offside