jim mk2

Watford haven't had to work hard for any of those 3 goals. Just given away

...... and another soft goal

The performance rel;ated coach will be pleased with this ... we're actually playing quite well But you can't defend like that and hope to win games

Brilliant run by Rothwell but poor final ball

Dack has lost pace (never had much) and confidence. His skill is playing up front, playing off the No 9, twisting and turning in the area, and he doesn't stand a chance with the way this team is set up. Might as well take him off

You can't win football matches if you keep conceding soft goals This has always been Mowbray's problem.... for years... and nothing changes

2-0, so easy, not even a contest Commentators are saying Rovers have been playing well and are unlucky!

This is hopeless...... toothless in attack, weak, inexperienced and prone to mistakes at the back Watford 3-0

Long balls aimed at a 5ft 7in centre forward🙄

Another very, very soft goal

Another very, very soft goal

25th minute 0 -1, I was 5 mins out

Davenport's probably having a beer at home

Evans and Rothwell..... that'll frighten 'em

To be fair, I thought the 2 teenagers played well in the last match. Agree that line-up doesn't inspire confidence

I think we know the plot tonight We'll start brightly but gradually fall back and then concede a soft goal (they're always soft) by the 20th minute Watford take control and the match meanders along until the 65th minute when Mowbray throws on 4 attacking subs Watford confirm their superiority shortly after with the second goal and although Rovers finally wake up in the last 10 minutes the match is already lost Rovers 0 Watford 2, and save yourself £10.

2 quick wickets but we need India to bat as badly as us to get back in this game

England failings rather than brilliance of the spinners.

Test match lost in one session. Well played England

Sibley has good concentration and the temperament to play a long innings but his technique is so poor. His bat does not come down straight and he turns his wrist at most balls to try to play them to leg. A good bowler will get him out and I don't see him as a long term solution to open the England batting

What does "performance related coach" mean? It's a load of gobbledgook to detract from results. If results had been good, but the performances poor, he'd have said he was a "results based coach". Anyway, Tony, if you want to be judged on performances most fans would agree they've been very poor, and that's being kind. Another defeat tonight and please do the decent thing and resign

Waggott's the nominal CEO at Ewood. He's the obvious "brains" behind this scheme and will have sold it to the owners as a good idea to claw some money back (and probably get a bonus for himself). Venky's, who have little or no input in the day to day running of the club as far as fans can tell, don't appear to be the villains here

A warning for the future ? This is Coventry City's Highfield Road ground in the 1980s .......... and this is the site now

Rovers forward John Byrom walking down the street where he lived at the time, John Bright Street in Blackburn, also the street of where Fred Pickering once lived. Picture date December 1964.

Yep, fixes the budget debt for a short period but doesn't tackle the structural debt. Flogging off Brockhall is like selling the family silver though. In the end, there's nothing left.