roversfan99

Whoever it is. They have repeatedly predicted that Szmodics will leave within 24 hours throughout the summer. Suppose at some stage they will likely be right, stopped clocks and all that.

Is that based on the HowardRV7 twitter account, which is a mirror of Mercer's posts? If so, that account has predicted that the deal was to be completed within 24 hours on a number of occasions throughout the summer. Just ignore it. Obviously it will probably will come true at some point, but they are just repeatedly saying it knowing at some point they can likely say they were right.

So talk of a fee agreed with Go Ahead Eagles is premature? Just get it done.

Obviously assuming we do sign him. And we have been much further along with transfers than this. Having expected all summer to be signing a pensioner "to compete with" Pears, a signing of this type would be a welcome surprise. Im basing that purely on the fact that he has been a regular for a side in the Dutch league that finished 9th last season, he has attracted interest albeit as 2nd choice from Ajax, he will cost a decent fee for us and he is at a good age. I have never heard of him. Comments on twitter show that he is well regarded and rated in Holland. Obviously if he signs the proof will be in the pudding in terms of his performances but I like the idea.

Is that your assumption/reading of it or has that been reported? (Not having a go, just genuinely trying to interpret your post correctly) I really wouldnt want someone like Begovic or Ruddy. Not only past it but I suspect unlike buying a keeper, it could lead to then being backup and calamity Pears continuing to be number 1.

Is that as in, just out of interest re a former supposed target, or as in there is an indication that we have or will go back for him?

Im not really sure why you keep swooping in with the "well Eustace wants it" trump card. So what? I am giving MY opinion on a potential deal. I think we need to keep Travis and I am also not convinced that Baker is best suited playing deep in a 2 man midfield. It would leave us even lighter in an already light position. Baker is a useful player, he can pop up with a goal and he can take a good free kick. He can also be anonymous and is probably better suited in front of 2 midfielders. Baker is also a few years older. So considering the balance of our squad and at the expense of Travis? Not for me. We arent in a position where we need FFP snookers considering the money brought in.

If that is the case then different story. But either way, a striker is not a direct alternative to a wide man and I wouldnt want to lose Travis.

Dozzell was my suggestion yesterday.

These 2 rumours today make little sense. We only have 3 central midfielders (not 6's, they are centre backs) so swapping one for another who often plays further forward seems illogical and would still leave us needing 1 or even 2 central midfielders. Germain seemingly is a striker on the back of a sudden surge of goals and is 29. How is that an alternative for a winger.

Germain is a 29 year old striker so I dont see how he is an alternative if we want a pacy winger. Swapping Baker for Travis doesnt solve the fact that we need another body in midfield.

Absolutely, I am not saying we should give him away. But if we dont sell him he wont be happy.

I thought a deal was very close? We only have 3 midfielders so swapping one for another doesnt really fix the problem either.

Players trotting out the same line they all say about potential moves. Would love to play Premier League but love it at my current club. If he is denied then he may well not react well as this could be his final chance.

Whats happening with De Lange?

Or equally, far too naive. His big career move hasnt been denied yet.

He isnt going to say "if I am denied my move of a lifetime I will kick off" is he.

That touch was the only thing he did right and even then he didnt know what to do next.

When he did play both before and after injury he himself struggled. He didnt get the same flak as Hyam but both need to revert back to the form shown in the season prior.

He was hopeless. He didnt look like he has been on a football pitch before, and made numerous mistakes in a short time, then was never seen again.

Its not about sources, but regardless of what standard cliches he has said publically or how he has appeared in club edited videos of training. There is a chance that if we dont agree a sale to a potentially last chance at playing in the Premier League and a massive wage increase, he may not react well. Doesnt mean we should allow him to go if a reasonable bid isnt made. But still, he may well spit his dummy out short term.

Eustace said post match yesterday that Batth, McFadzean and Weimann likely wont be involved for 3 or 4 weeks.

How do you know his character so well? The soundbites on podcasts etc are what every single player would say. Would love to play in the Premier League, but I am happy at my current club. Of course there is a chance that he would be in a strop if he didnt get a move. Doesnt mean we should just let him go regardless of if we get a reasonable offer, and if he stays eventually I am sure he would suck it up and play because it is in everyones best interests. But dont be naive enough to read too much into what he says in public.

I wonder if Andre Dozzell will come onto our radar as a midfielder. Not saying he should necessarily but he is free, decent age and should be fit straight away having been on trial at Sheffield United all summer.

I feel like the mistake v Sheffield Wednesday was so bad, that it actually took the focus away from the fact that he made so many mistakes across the course of the season. He is a liability in general but now all that people refer back to is that one fluke. I definitely agree that he played his best football at right back. I felt like he was not half as effective in midfield, maybe him wide/further forward will be beneficial.