Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

K-Hod

Moderation Lead
  • Posts

    18763
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Other groups

Backroom Subscriber

K-Hod last won the day on June 18

K-Hod had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Location
    Clitheroe

Recent Profile Visitors

23869 profile views

K-Hod's Achievements

World Cup

World Cup (9/9)

  • Great Content Rare
  • Week Streak Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • One week done
  • 28 Days Later

Recent Badges

21.2k

Reputation

  1. Please can someone wake me up when they start taking these better decisions? Ta.
  2. I never understand why people have to rate something as being so good or bad, instead of just ‘it’s not for me, but it’s fair enough if other people like it’. Imagine someone being my that arrogant that they think their opinion trumps everyone else and they won’t listen to any different opinions. What a world we live in.
  3. It absolutely could do, if they're thrown into the first team too quickly and make loads of mistakes. Then dent their confidence in the process and their careers never recover. Countless examples of that over the years.
  4. It's a shirt in one pre-season match. As ever, the offer still stands for you to represent BRFCS on the Forum instead of sniping on here.
  5. No, Everton are in their home kit, we’re in our away. It’s only a shirt, no need to get so upset. The FF didn’t object, nah. Some were surprised, some didn’t care (Hiya), as it’s only a friendly. If that makes it a dereliction of duty, so be it. There are bags of things to criticise the current administration over, I don’t think this is one of them, personally.
  6. Poster above this, had nailed it, but to confirm- I never rated Steve Waggott at all, but I still think he had more about him than Suhail Pasha, so that should hopefully clear up any doubt about my feelings on Suhail Pasha. Now where’s that clip of Mick McCarthy? https://youtu.be/Kou3MoGuvEM?si=vegEICGfMjn7w8wp
  7. Oh well, because it failed once, might as well not bother trying again then?
  8. 1st bit in bold- Are you trying to say the word 'accurate' here? Either way, it's unrealistic to expect such a long meeting to be recreated in the minutes. 2nd bit in bold- Completely unfair and way off the mark. As I've said before, if anyone thinks they can do a better job, they're welcome to join.
  9. Not mine- meeting started at 630pm, I was at my car for 820pm.
  10. Whilst, this isn't exactly high praise- I do think Waggott was more competent, but I think Suhail has the ear of the owners.
  11. Oh yeah, it was only a throw away comment. He thinks I'm wrong about something, I think I'm right and it was his response, that I felt was telling and how he phrased it.
  12. I reckon Suhail would rather tap dance on a minefield than attend the meetings, but, he said something to me last night, that suggests he's rattled.
  13. I feel like members got their points across and explained what the issues were very well. People spoke with passion and conviction, which is all you can ask for, really.
  14. Can't give an exact timeframe on the release of the minutes, but hopefully, it's sooner, rather than later. No need for anyone to regard themselves as peasants for not having the information immediately and certainly no need to have any concerns about them being edited. In all fairness too, the meeting was nearly 2 hours long last night, so any minutes won't include it verbatim...... In any event, if I don't feel the minutes included something vital, either myself, or one of the other posters on here in attendance, would share that with the forum.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.