Would there be any legs in engaging other supporter bases who are / have gone through similar owner issues? Blackpool, Charlton, Reading, Pompey, Coventry even Liverpool fans to form some form of solidarity statement or actions? Getting a huge supporter base to make a bit of noise such as Liverpool fans would attract a lot of interest I would imagine

The wiriting is on the wall - Brittain goes and then Travis and Tronstrad ask themselves why bother, an inevitable tatty bye to all 3. IMO, bottom 3 come September and marooned at bottom by December.

Yes we are aware 😉

I know the coalition has succeeded in driving Waggott out and are now gunning for the other two. I don't know if it is common knowledge yet, or even significant, but the house in at area where Pasha lives, appears to have been vacated.

Just a recap Two and a half months ago we had No Coalition. We had Jack a brfcs poster reaching out and hitting a brick wall to try and get something moving. His passion and drive was something I felt I could get involved with and many others felt the same and also joined to form a powerful voice. Fast forward to present day. Every supporter group bar one and we are trying to get this one is part of the Coalition. Our first action was applying pressure on Suhail, Waggott and Gestede with the total vote of no confidence. This lead to the three coming out into the open and one has now gone. The pressure on the other two will remain. The global press our now covering our story and desire for the removal of the Raos and their band of merry men. Our story is going back into parliament and we've now got the MPs backing the Coalition. We've so much going on across a near 30 person panel it's quite extraordinary in such a short space of time. Things evolve by the minute and it's hard graft, extremely hard graft as our family time and in some cases taking days of work is being totally used up to force a better future. We are still in our infancy and many things need to be agreed, formulated and developed. We have no funds , just hard grafting people trying to make a positive difference for something we commonly share, our club. Given the democratic make up (we don't need politics) we have to balance everything and get a majority buy in on all things. No one person leads the coalition, it's a collective group of people. Anybody can get involved and shape it's future. There really is no blue print for the journey we are on. Other clubs supporters actually use previous Rovers supporter actions for their blueprints. I think we've come a long way in a short space of time, but have a long way to go. Its going to have it's bumps on the way, as we are all human. We are all just football supporters equal to the next and don't have all the answers.

Wharton is far better than jobe. I know which one I'd take

You are right, we nearly go to the playoffs twice.

I have always maintained it is because they have something to hide, as nothing else makes any sense at all.

Selling Brittain for say £3m and getting in Dramaeh for £1m and less wages would be right up this lot's street. Cooney hasn't been credibly linked. Definitely either Trav or Tonstrad, Trav is my guess.

I’ve no intention of reading it myself lol. Maybe I should have linked this fact sheet too: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/football-governance-bill-2024-supporting-documents/fact-sheet-overview#:~:text=The legislation will strengthen the,need a licence to operate. edited with correct link.

That's one hell of a document to read and I would imagine most ordinary fans (myself included) are unlikely to read it and understand it. Fair play to the coalition for doing so and Mashed Potato too and any other fan who has.

How about the doesn’t fit Ismael’s way of playing card - who are they saving that one for?

I’ve said before from my time in the Trust, in addition to those who made public offers (The two Ian’s, and the Qataris), there are at least 4 potential owners (I believe all are consortia) who had maintained an interest from when they first privately engaged Venkys up to at least the point I left the Trust a couple of years ago. That means they were still interested during our L1 season. Nobody should underestimate the appeal to new potential owners of the ‘kudos’ of ‘taking a founding member of the FL and PL back to the top’. It holds real appeal for those people that can afford to play Football Manager in real life. But it continues to beg the questions: Why does that not appeal to Venkys? Why do they not sell or seek external investment? What is in it for them to cling to our carcass?

Of course, Glen, has to piece by piece, Apologies if I misread your post, as it initially red to me that though some may want a sale, a strong board was actually the aim. If that’s an initial, short term aim as we work towards a sale, then fair enough, who could disagree with that - as after fifteen years we know they won’t ever change course, or run the club in a professional way to help this club fulfill its potential, so a sale has to be the ultimate aim.

Thank you for this. I think the club with its history and excellent Academy would attract potential purchasers without too much difficulty. The difficult issue would be negotiating a price.

Somebody should have bought Ismael, a euro millions ticket last night, 199 million in the transfer kitty, problems solved.

Where did he say this?

Yep they're playing the textbook 'player wants away' strategy and as correctly pointed out above phase 1 of that is to try and convince as many people as possible that the club has been hard at work trying to tie said player down to a bumper new long term contract. Immediately shifts the attention away from Rovers and on to the player. Next up it will be talk about the player wanting to play in the Premier League, or having family ties down South, or being offered highest paid player status but refusing to sign. Again cleverly shifting blame away from the club and onto the player or circumstances outside of our control. Seen it all before. Its such a shame that some still can't see what they are up to. The problem they will face is they are going to have to repeat this game 3-4 times this summer with Travis, Dolan, Brittain and Tronstad. They already came with the 'family ties on the continent' rubbish with Tronstad which he swiftly silenced with his interview soon after declaring he would be happy to stay.

Google the words "Football Governance Bill House Of Commons Library" - and then go on to the link dated 23 April 2025. Scroll down that page to the words "Explanatory Notes" as of 27 March 2025. They run for 116 pages. For the purposes of what has been discussed on this thread I think you will find pages 40 to 52 the most relevant. I was interested to see what is about to happen. My hunch is that fans are likely to be disappointed; I've seen comments on here about fans getting "more power" whereas that power is really limited to various heritage issues like club name or colour of shirts. I suspect it won't be too long before the Regulator is one of the most unpopular people in the country.

Sounds like Suhail has got to them using deflection techniques to keep him safe

100% agree there are limits to what can be done if you do not have a channel of communication. I still believe one of the ways to draw out Venkys into actually doing something (or not which still speaks volumes) is to actively source interested investors. Through our network, we must have some corporate financier, private equity professionals, well connected HNWs that could potentially gauge interest? The three amigos (now two) said that they would be present 'credible offers' to Venkys so let's find them....This interest (regardless of how concrete) would provide strong ammo for the Coalition to present to media.

That's not what I've said, I said my personal thoughts (we all have different) is we need to remove things systematically. Toppling the king becomes easier by toppling the pawns. We have to be realistic of what we can or cannot influence. Piece by piece, is in my opinion the correct approach. Unless someone can come up with a viable plan how we remove the owners first? I don't believe a single person in the coalition wants the Raos to own this club, me included. That's our opinion, Removing them is an almighty challenge which requires deeper thoughts and a strategy that reaches the finish line with the desired outcome and hopefully better owners. On your edited part "enough is enough" is exactly where we are. We do not believe communication is worth a dime, However we want to maintain the moral high ground of being amenable. (We knew the club would avoid all communication, we banked on it) it's now one less bullet for them to crucify the supporters in their rebuttals. Playing the game is exactly where we want to be, completely in control of our path without giving freebies to the club to beat us

Jesus Christ, Ryan Cooney got released and couldn't get a kick at Morecambe 2 years ago. He's absolutely terrible and about 2 stone heavy. I know he played a lot for Crewe last year but honestly if that's where we are at with quality of signings just announce voluntary relegation now.

So predictable, also explains the nominal links to Drameh and Cooney as replacements not back-ups

So fundamentally the Coalition is not standing on a platform of wanting new owners? WATR got a lot of stick re sticking to their long held stance of wanting communication and engagement with them, for wanting change at board level, but necessarily ownership. But that is also the preferred outcome of the Coalition? Even though there is no indication as per Glen’s post above mine that they have any interest in changing course? So ‘enough is enough’ is when? I’ll be honest I thought that’s where the Coalition already was, obviously I had the wrong impression.