Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Wonder if Pears could end up back at Boro if Toth is going to be our new no1 and we're looking to generate £££
  3. A quick Google shows HMRC have confirmed the investigation but not the clubs involved. The ‘they’ for the £17 million is the 33 clubs combined not Rovers (even if we are one of the clubs) individually.
  4. Is there no footage of this game Gav?
  5. Didn't Mbappe leave PSG for nothing ?
  6. Posted in another thread but I’ll post here as well
  7. Today
  8. What did we do to deserve this,is there to be any end in sight of this Madness? Can't help but think they hang on to us to keep further wrongdoing coming to light. Weary of this Bollox.
  9. 135 years of existence, really. The last 15 years we've been in purgatory.
  10. Not sure on the state of play with that but i presume they are much smaller self sufficient operations. I do know something bit the dust over there and i don't think the big Swiss vaccine plant plans they had ever got off the ground.
  11. Rovers also apparently being investigated by hmrc too
  12. Today's article in The Athletic (and NY Times) will be uncomfortable reading for the Rao family. They must surely be getting the message now that any issue within the club will be attributed to their brand name and family name. Whether this is enough for them to realise Pasha appears to be lying to them I don't know but the pressure continues through some exceptional work by Glen, Rory and co
  13. Don't they have various pharmaceutical interests in Europe? Wonder how they manage to get money to them if needed? Although they're maybe all profit earners or at the very least self sufficient.
  14. Hmmm knowing how things work over there i think they've every right to be worried they'd never see their money again regardless of the outcome. Main danger though is it could just go on year after year and tie up tens of millions although their alleged mega generosity due to being double billionaires seems to have disappeared these last few years.
  15. I mean, in an ideal world, we'd all like our wide players to be chipping in with 10 -15 goals per season but I really don't think 7 is that bad. If he'd reached double figures that would probably have been regarded as an excellent effort. Not far off.
  16. we`ll miss his work rate,thats a sad fact,he`s inconsistent but never shirks in the yards run stat we are seemingly letting a another player go for nothing,you can`t run a football club like this and expect to stay in the division,sooner or later it`s all going to come crashing down,rovers must be the only professional club that don`t bother that their better players end up leaving for nothing we are also without doubt are the worst run club in the whole football league set up
  17. Yep. (Speculating here)......maybe it's like Exiled said and they know there are further matters yet to be uncovered therefore they know they'd be likely to lose any monies put up as guarantee. But.....(Thinking aloud) If all other dealings related to Rovers are above board then even with a politically motivated Government gunning for you, surely any guarantees given in that respect should be safe and there shouldn't be any worries in that respect about sending money over. It's a weird one.
  18. It just means they were desperate to get him off the payroll so probably took a small fee in return for adding a big sell on.
  19. Well if mine's correct i think it was our mate Nixon putting it about so how true it might have been is up for debate 😁
  20. i think it`s massively far fetched that the imbeciles and incompetents in the ewood back office were astute enough to negotiate a big sell on clause for a player that was out of his depth in english football😅 nixon must have run out of rumours to make up,so he`s invented this one
  21. Correction. In the Venkys back pockets!
  22. It was higher up the list this time as it was deemed a new matter (albeit clearly linked to the ongoing one).
  23. I think the charge is they bought Neville’s house with money they said was being sent over for use in their poultry business.
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.