Haha fair point. I'm in Italy right now so technically it is

Probably because it's not 10am yet?

Nothing on the Roverstore yet as far as i can see?

Strikes me as having neither nous nor gravitas. IMO, Gestede should simply not be in that role, novice or otherwise - he is fathoms out of his depth. and there you have it - IMO, 3 footballing nobodies and the dumbing down process to all things Rovers is further entrenched. There is absolutely no doubting the club's ambition. The one factor that might just hold them back is their manager Phil Parkinson. A decent track level BELOW Championship level but he's failed to cut it as Championship level with other clubs. Would not surprise me if Parkinson is not an early managerial casualty as the ownership want success and quickly - they aint interested in 'consolidation' or 'projects'.

Maybe at 10?

More like the guy in the bobble hat ‘Int Rovers brilliant, blue and white kit, brilliant, no contracts, brilliant, expensive season tickets, brilliant!’

Agree wholeheartedly! If the colours aren’t reversed, it’s not a Rovers shirt

So where's this 10am online launch then 🤔

Yes, and it's exactly what they all want, and as I have thought for a while, it's all completely by design. It's much cheaper for our billionaire owners to fund a league one club run on academy players, plus the odd lower division journeyman and a few foreign 2nd/3rd division players, than it is to fund a middling/top end Championship side that needs experienced, competent 26-31 year old players as the core of the team. There's a reason we're not signing anyone up to new contracts anymore despite all the talk of willing to do this, or willing to offer that. Fact's are that no senior players have signed a new contract since December 2023. Our only contracted players past June 2027 are Connor O'Riordan, Tom Atcheson & Dion De Neve. One or two will have options too (Pickering, Ohashi & Gueye from memory). I believe that the club is gearing up to be a league one side by the 27-28 season at the latest, using 90% academy players as the first team squad. In reality it will probably happen before that.

Have no doubt that Wrexham will be fine in the championship this season, just unsure they will be as high flying as some seem to think.

Haven't even bothered with that this year. I do agree that the shirt looks fine for what it is, but the lack of quarters really irritates me.

Cash flow, how else they going to pay the leccy bill for June?

Got a few theories as to how this kit release is going to go. Quite a lot of people are grateful for the early release, but I think this was part of the plan as they decided to pull their finger out to help get more sales. Get the home kit released early, gives more time to separate between that one and the away kit and the third kit. I am expecting the third one to be more of alt home shirt with a retro design. Could possibly wear it for the home match closest to the 5th November but if they get the home shirt sales in first, then released the retro shirt, they can get two or even three shirts sold for some fans. Thoughts anyone?

I'm really not that hung up on having a different badge, for 34 years of my 40 we've had the current badge and the 6 years prior to that we had a Tudor Rose. Our quartered shirts are our badge in essence, some sort of heraldry or scroll would have been nice. As I've said, nice shirt in its own right I just think it's stuck being neither modern nor retro, design is a nod to the 60's but with no other retro elements

Not bothered by his admission. Let's not think the club for one minute didn't want to cash in on him either and wouldn't want him injured... it's like the 'not available due to injury' line before a player sold. Always gave it on the pitch. That is what counts.

And the one who goes shopping…that’s Rudy isn’t it? ”Did you get the new centre back, midfielder & striker that we desperately need dear..?” ”Even better than that…I got a candlabra, a new cordless drill & a meat pie…”

Gestede will be dictating where the scouts are looking, and the majority of the links are foreign players, we need to be looking at domestic players aswell and I don't just mean loaning kids from prem academy's

I was in the attic the other day and found an original copy of the bible. Which was nice🤣

Posters wishing injury on a player - whatever that player is deemed to have done - is not acceptable in my view. As Szmodics refused to play then he should expect dog's abuse from some sections of the crowd - as their money was paying his wages then they have a right to feel cheated by him. But that should be as far as it goes.

The area being deliberately and maliciously deprived for the last 40 odd years plays a part in those big games not selling too well also. Those games are massively overpriced. There's a lot of factors at play here, not just location and what division we're in. Our attendance at the league cup final was great and showed what great support the club has.

Totally agree that support is good relative to size of town and the large number of surrounding clubs (a fact supporters of the likes of Norwich and Leicester tend to ignore when criticising our support). However that does mean in absolute terms our support will always be limited compared to many other clubs. I remember the 92 play-off final and the Old Trafford FA cup semi-final as two occasions when we couldn't sell our allocation.

I'm reminded of the character in the waistcoat in The Fast Show who always had impossibly fortunate stuff happening unexpectedly to him and ended up by saying : "Which was nice!"

This.

That's all Southgate managed at the last World Cup.

The shirt itself would look nice enough if it was a normal year but it's an absolute disgrace that this is basically just a normal shirt and the anniversary hasnt been been noted on the front of the shirt somehow with the badge. How can they get something so simple so badly wrong? Par for the course with this regime unfortunately. I'm assuming that if an actual anniversary shirt is released at some point, the thinking is that they will try and rinse anyone who is daft enough to pay £50 or £60 for a top twice.