[Archived] Oliver Holt

[bob fleming]

There's only one way to find out....

FIGHT!!!!

[Mr Creosote]

Who writes the better articles...HOLT V CUMMINS

You can always tell when The Yahoos are doing well. Claret bedecked, knuckle dragging troglodytes insult the eye in Accrington and Stephen Cummings mentions Rovers in his column.

[imy9]

bloody hell imy you said ince was the man up until the last two games .

Holt's argument was anti John Williams and my points are indicative of the support that Hughes received at Rovers over 4 years.

Oh and I supported Ince until the last three games but whats in a game hey

[John]

Not sure whether to get angry or just laugh - such a ridiculous article.

What a complete tool.

[1864roverite]

the thing that is oliver holt is defined as a MORON

If that is the best he can summon up out of the depths of his toilet then it proves without a shadow of a doubt he is nothing short of a moron writing drivel after drivel.

People have been shot for less

[Amo]

I wouldn't be surprised if he is just working as a proxy for colleague Darren Lewis.

[Dufflite]

Anyone tried oliver.holt@mirror.co.uk ? I believe this could put you in direct contact with him...

[OscarRaven]

Daily Mirror circulation in Blackburn must not be a concern for the editor to alllow Holt to pursue this little crusade.

I'll never buy it again.

[DeadlyDirk]

I don't really get the point of this latest article, so all English owners are bad and foreign owners are better? Oh sorry I forgot, anything related to Blackburn is bad.

This has annoyed me though, that article talking about how good Hughes is and how good the likes of Eddie and Bowen are as backup, well why doesn't he mention that they built up this good working relationship at Blackburn, the only club they have all been at where we were ready to give a British manager a chance.

He ignores all our history and anything good about the club, the guy is an idiot. We have always supported British managers, in fact I can't even think of a foreign manager we've had, unless we had one a long time ago which is probably unlikely. I bet there are not many premiership clubs that can say they have only employed British managers.

Who was that other British manager we had, oh yes Dalglish, he won the league with us you know Oliver, RFW being the only other british manager to win the premiership. Which brings up a good point, if british managers are so good then why don't they win the premiership or why when the likes of Mourinho, Grant, Houllier among others leave their clubs do they look for foreign replacements?

The main difference with us and City though is the bloody money, if we had bucket loads to spend in January like he did then it's a lot less risk!

Hopefully this article can all blow up in his face come the City Hull game.

[JAL]

I don't really get the point of this latest article, so all English owners are bad and foreign owners are better? Oh sorry I forgot, anything related to Blackburn is bad.

This has annoyed me though, that article talking about how good Hughes is and how good the likes of Eddie and Bowen are as backup, well why doesn't he mention that they built up this good working relationship at Blackburn, the only club they have all been at where we were ready to give a British manager a chance.

He ignores all our history and anything good about the club, the guy is an idiot. We have always supported British managers, in fact I can't even think of a foreign manager we've had, unless we had one a long time ago which is probably unlikely. I bet there are not many premiership clubs that can say they have only employed British managers.

Who was that other British manager we had, oh yes Dalglish, he won the league with us you know Oliver, RFW being the only other british manager to win the premiership. Which brings up a good point, if british managers are so good then why don't they win the premiership or why when the likes of Mourinho, Grant, Houllier among others leave their clubs do they look for foreign replacements?

The main difference with us and City though is the bloody money, if we had bucket loads to spend in January like he did then it's a lot less risk!

Hopefully this article can all blow up in his face come the City Hull game.

Maybe what Oliver Holt is trying to prove is just like the English managers the English journalists are also idiots of the highest order.

[Anti-Dingle-Brigade]

Maybe what Oliver Holt is trying to prove is just like the English managers the English journalists are also idiots of the highest order.

Bit tight on Big Sam, that.

[trueblue]

Hopefully this article can all blow up in his face come the City Hull game.

I have just emailed the pompous ass with that very same point!

[JAL]

Bit tight on Big Sam, that.

Yeh referring to Ince not Sam.

[Anti-Dingle-Brigade]

So you generalised Ince as "English Managers"?

Why didn't you just say Ince?!!?!

[JAL]

So you generalised Ince as "English Managers"?

Why didn't you just say Ince?!!?!

Jumped in feet first there, your right my mistake.

Merry xmas.

[Majiball]

God Damm,

Come on line for a quick check on any news and I have to read that Knobs comments.

I hope you are spending your pay-off wisely Ince.

At this rate Oliver Holt will find a mob outside his office one day.

I am far from impressed, whats the name of his boss, anyone?

Merry Xmas one and all, good will to all men (with the exception of Oliver Holt, I hope the three christmas ghosts had fun with you last night, prick)

[DeadlyDirk]

Oliver's Wikipedia page is a lot more accurate now at least.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Holt

Ok well at least it was, they obviously didn't appeciate my comments, still it amused me for the 30 seconds it lasted.

[John]

Sunderland need to offload El Hadji Diouf and Pascal Chimbonda pronto

[philipl]

Sunderland need to offload El Hadji Diouf and Pascal Chimbonda pronto

Hilarious coming to that link from Holt straighjt from Kamy's note saying Sunderland are not selling Diouf!

I know whom I would believe and its not Oliver Holt.

[philipl]

Looking at my post above, Kamy got it right and Holt got it wrong.

[trs]

For those of you want their blood boiling this fine Sunday morning you can turn to sky sports 1 and tune in to the ramblings of our friend Holt.

[Amo]

HOLT: INCE WAS RIGHT TO SIGN ANDREWS

When Paul Ince bought Keith Andrews from Milton Keynes Dons and played him in the Blackburn Rovers first team, it was held up as an example of how Ince was out of his depth as a manager in the Premier League.

Would that be the same Keith Andrews who has started regularly under Sam Allardyce and scored the winner in Blackburn's most important win of the season at Hull on Sunday?

-------

Bit of a cheap way to praise Ince, when one could argue the dearth of talent in midfield is the reason we're in this relegation fight!

[greco]

HOLT: INCE WAS RIGHT TO SIGN ANDREWS

When Paul Ince bought Keith Andrews from Milton Keynes Dons and played him in the Blackburn Rovers first team, it was held up as an example of how Ince was out of his depth as a manager in the Premier League.

Would that be the same Keith Andrews who has started regularly under Sam Allardyce and scored the winner in Blackburn's most important win of the season at Hull on Sunday?

-------

Bit of a cheap way to praise Ince, when one could argue the dearth of talent in midfield is the reason we're in this relegation fight!

excatly mate.

on the contrary to holts point of view, you could also point out to the fact, that ince didnt get enough out of his players and thats perhaps a major reason, as to why andrews was woeful. Sam has emerged with a system, in which the player roles are more specified, so perhaps that is the reason, why andrews is looking a bit better.

OR holt might want to check out our injuries, as an explanaition to his many games.

it certainly not. a definitive stamp of approval, for ince, that andrews is playing. why didnt holt mention simpson, villanueva or the average but expensive grella.

its baffling.. first it was racism, then it was foreign owners who were better and now he trying once again, to throw a little mud in our direction.. he really should broaden his perspective.

[tony gale's mic]

What a pathetic man. You can sort of understand him sticking up for his mate to keep him in a job (even though its very unprofessional as a journalist and still wrong), but to keep it going this long after he's left is ridiculous.

[Amo]

I sent our friend Mr.Holt an e-mail to explain why his logic was so flawed. He reasons that Andrews was a managerial master-stroke by Ince even though Andrews is one of the key reasons we're in this position!

Ince spent almost the same amount of cash on Grella & Andrews as Mark Hughes did on Santa Cruz & McCarthy. That shows you how far we fell.