braddock Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=1...;mid=2125440165
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
Cocker Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 Am I missing something? Most seem quite good points? They just seem to be discussing Gareth Bale and I can't disagree with this guy:- ecc #26 08 Jul 2009 17:23 Complain | Signed: April 2004 re: re: re: garath bale ... Bale'sz ok going forward but his primary function is to defend and that's where, IMHO, he's found lacking. Again, I could be missing something
braddock Posted July 8, 2009 Author Posted July 8, 2009 Am I missing something? Most seem quite good points? They just seem to be discussing Gareth Bale and I can't disagree with this guy:- Again, I could be missing something do you think burnley have a chance of signing gareth bale?
Cocker Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 I think they may have a chance of getting him on loan but I don't really care? Shouldn't this be in other premiership happenings?
SamDingle Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 do you think burnley have a chance of signing gareth bale? More than you have of signing Ruud.
Ritchie Posted July 8, 2009 Posted July 8, 2009 do you think burnley have a chance of signing gareth bale? Bale would be a sensible signing. Do you find Attenborough's wildlife documentaries amusing too?
Roost Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 More than you have of signing Ruud. Hey Dingle. In 10 days time its your 5 year anniversary of your obsession with this message board. A proud moment for you i'm sure............ I wonder if you will celebrate by playing with the Blackburn Rovers Subbuteo team you have hidden under your bed?
unluckymorton Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 More than you have of signing Ruud. Ruud would be a major coup for us, would you class Bale on loan being a major coup??? You could do better than to spend all that money on Bales excessive wages. Try putting a bid in for Keith Treacy....
tcj_jones Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 More than you have of signing Ruud. Haha, fair play. I'm not sure how much you need a left back, but Bale looked absolutely brilliant a couple of seasons ago and Harry doesn't seem particularly keen on him. I'd say there's a very good chance another Premier League team could get him. However, I'd say you'd probably be better off going for solid, if unspectacular full backs in your first season up.
LeftWinger Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 Has Bale ever won a Premier League game? I remember he'd not been on the winning side in something like his first 30 appearances. If he wants to further that record - a move to the Turf would be an excellent idea.
Amo Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 They'll be losing enough games next season without having the curse of Bale.
4ever&ever Posted July 9, 2009 Posted July 9, 2009 Haha, fair play. I'd say you'd probably be better off going for solid, if unspectacular full backs in your 1 fluke season up. Changed that for you Jones
XLM Posted July 14, 2009 Posted July 14, 2009 yeah they wouldn't stand a chance with bale guy must have been an idiot there must be a load of stupid threads every day from that site
braddock Posted January 4, 2010 Author Posted January 4, 2010 here's a few to cheer you up http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2123400037 http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2123402263
Kelbo Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Rudolph, how nice to see you here after such a busy Christmas pulling Santas Sleigh
braddock Posted January 4, 2010 Author Posted January 4, 2010 Obsessed with the Clarets you lot. yeah, a five month old thread with 15 replies. but yes, this is very fun to watch. seriously, this is the funniest thing in football i've followed none rovers wise.
ABBEY Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Rudolph, how nice to see you here after such a busy Christmas pulling Santas Sleigh more like cleaning the @#/? from the stables.
broadsword Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 How does that work, I'm not very au fait with online betting? You wager £1200 that Owen Coyle won't go to Bolton. But if he does actually go and he loses his bet, he only loses 20% of his stake? Is it something to do with the odds ratio of 1.2? Equally, if he wins, presumably his return is £1200 X 1.2?
braddock Posted January 4, 2010 Author Posted January 4, 2010 How does that work, I'm not very au fait with online betting? You wager £1200 that Owen Coyle won't go to Bolton. But if he does actually go and he loses his bet, he only loses 20% of his stake? Is it something to do with the odds ratio of 1.2? Equally, if he wins, presumably his return is £1200 X 1.2? i think it has something to do with the fact he's betting it along side a few other things and if the others come in he'll recoup a certain amount back and the damage won't be as bad. maybe in other news http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2123399566
broadsword Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 Ah, he's put some "savers" on. Rather him than me, seems a daft bet.
eddiewac Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 I think you enter the amount you want to win, so like £1200 and this is like how much money you are willing to take from other people at whatever odds you enter, so like 1200 x £1 bets, but if they all win, then you just give them all their pounds back so you haven't actually lost anything but then you pay them 0.20 of 1200 as their winnings, which is £200 or whatever, but obviously if they all lose, you keep all their quids
broadsword Posted January 4, 2010 Posted January 4, 2010 So essentially you're the bookie offering 6/5 that Coyle will go. I think anyone worth their salt should be offering odds-on by now. What a prat.
trs Posted January 7, 2010 Posted January 7, 2010 One for Nicko http://boards.footymad.net/forum.php?tno=104&fid=297&sty=2&act=1&mid=2123349550
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.