Valérien Ismaël: Blackburn Rovers Head Coach

[DE.]

18 hours ago, Upside Down said:

Here's the list:

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

If they have a list it'll be scouted from teams in the relegation zone of obscure minor leagues, or players at average clubs who can't get a game. 

[chaddyrovers]

1 hour ago, roversfan99 said:

The point was that you was using the formation as a reason to praise Ismael whilst having a dig at previous managers who you at the time also would have defended but now theyve gone you have turned on.

You are wrong here, I repeatably slammed Mowbray for being stubborn over sticking with 3-4-3 false 9 formation and if memory served me right, YOU ACTUALLY back Mowbray not me. He changed formation too late and cost us a playoff place, 

1 hour ago, roversfan99 said:

I just was pointing out that its not really been a roaring success. Initially we had Scott Wharton fit and got 9 of those 15 points in 3 games, hes bang average but average is much better than whats left without him. The points have not really followed since.

no-one said it has been roaring success which are your words not mine but changing formations has got us wins, that's what we wanted

1 hour ago, roversfan99 said:

It wasnt a debate about which formation I would or wouldnt play. To be honest, with the current set of players especially our crap defenders its impossible to build a balanced team out of whats left either way. We dont have 1 competent centre back, never mind 3, but we also dont have any competent wide players.

Its was very simple and straight forward question, but instead we get this and that excuses instead of actually answering the question

[roversfan99]

The usual routine of changing the question and then whinging when your deflection question is not answered.

Following a 180 degree turn from wanting Ismael gone to him being the new messiah, you used the formation as proof that Ismael isnt stubborn comparing favourably to previous more successful managers.

We have lost more than we have won with the back 3, and 3 of the wins came when we were a totally different proposition with Wharton available. I was just adding this context, the change has led to more losses than wins. The formation helped to lead to an initial small spike in results but soon fizzled out. Obviously we are limited with a really poor squad.

 

[chaddyrovers]

6 minutes ago, roversfan99 said:

The usual routine of changing the question and then whinging when your deflection question is not answered.

Following a 180 degree turn from wanting Ismael gone to him being the new messiah, you used the formation as proof that Ismael isnt stubborn comparing favourably to previous more successful managers.

We have lost more than we have won with the back 3, and 3 of the wins came when we were a totally different proposition with Wharton available. I was just adding this context, the change has led to more losses than wins. The formation helped to lead to an initial small spike in results but soon fizzled out. Obviously we are limited with a really poor squad.

 

same old RF99 response, refusing to answer a simple straight forward question. If you can't answer it, please don't expect me to your questions. 

Over the top comments like a roaring success or Ismael is the new messiah which no-one even mentioned apart from YOU! This is what you repeatably do, nowhere I have said either comment but you have chosen to used that which and lied about what I said