roversfan99 Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Sick of hearing that and the window hasnt opened yet. 1 1 Quote
neophox Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Derby acting quick. Sanderson joins on a permanent deal. Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 2 hours ago Author Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, K-Hod said: Do we know the first two sentences for certain? Or is this just what Nixon says, so you’re believing it? You have seen the Nixon story, gets plenty correct. If you don't want to believe him then fine. Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, neophox said: Derby acting quick. Sanderson joins on a permanent deal. danish midfielder fraulo also joins from borussia muenchengladbach,eustace not hanging around 2 Quote
KentExile Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 13 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Sick of hearing that and the window hasnt opened yet. even if its not, there is nothing to stop deals being done and announced ahead of time Case in point.... 1 Quote
Ricky Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago You don’t help yourself Chaddy mate. All the evidence points to us being pretty abysmal when it comes to January windows, so much so that it’s basically led to our last two managers leaving. Yet because Nicko has said we’re getting a bid in for a winger (a position which we don’t actually use) you think it’s all roses. I do wonder if VI is using the media to push the board a bit. He’s aware that he is trying to compete with a bang average squad and knows he needs more quality. He’s playing a dangerous game trying to push this lot into actually signing someone decent. He’ll be out of the door by mid February. 1 Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 20 minutes ago, simongarnerisgod said: danish midfielder fraulo also joins from borussia muenchengladbach,eustace not hanging around Fraulo by all accounts isn’t a Eustace signing - he also hasn’t signed Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: Fraulo by all accounts isn’t a Eustace signing - he also hasn’t signed https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn4d4eg0vnxo Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, simongarnerisgod said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn4d4eg0vnxo Set to make their first signing - yet Sanderson is their first signing as stated above he hasn’t signed or been made official will be an interesting one a lot of Derby fans stating it’s a club signing not a Eustace one - we’ve seen that before Quote
Leonard Venkhater Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said: Set to make their first signing - yet Sanderson is their first signing as stated above he hasn’t signed or been made official will be an interesting one a lot of Derby fans stating it’s a club signing not a Eustace one - we’ve seen that before Is Eustace being linked with other clubs yet? Quote
Emerald Isle Rover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Leonard Venkhater said: Is Eustace being linked with other clubs yet? Still time lol Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 19 minutes ago, Ricky said: You don’t help yourself Chaddy mate. All the evidence points to us being pretty abysmal when it comes to January windows, so much so that it’s basically led to our last two managers leaving. Yet because Nicko has said we’re getting a bid in for a winger (a position which we don’t actually use) you think it’s all roses. I do wonder if VI is using the media to push the board a bit. He’s aware that he is trying to compete with a bang average squad and knows he needs more quality. He’s playing a dangerous game trying to push this lot into actually signing someone decent. He’ll be out of the door by mid February. Ricky, The past is the past. Nothing we can do about that. No-one has said everything is all roses. Reading things that aren't being said by myself the biggest clue was last week when Ismael revealed he had spoken to the owners on the phone, Neither JDT and Eustace did that. I see that as a key difference between our situation now and then. Nicko has posted a story we have a bid rejected for Reyes Clearly who played for Barnsley and can play anywhere across the front line. He also said we want Ben Gibson. All the best for New Year Ricky Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago 23 minutes ago, simongarnerisgod said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cn4d4eg0vnxo But its a club signing not his choice of signing by reading that article. Quote
... Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, Leonard Venkhater said: Is Eustace being linked with other clubs yet? Aye serial club hopper Quote
JHRover Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago So Nixon says 'substantial' six figure bid rejected for the Barnsley lad. I know he's partly employed to put a shine on all things Rovers under the rotten regime but is there such thing as a a 'substantial' six figure bid in modern day Championship terms? The most it could possibly be is £999,999 which would not be a substantial sum for a Championship football club, especially not one used to selling players for 10x that amount every transfer window. 1 Quote
Waggy76 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 10 minutes ago, JHRover said: So Nixon says 'substantial' six figure bid rejected for the Barnsley lad. I know he's partly employed to put a shine on all things Rovers under the rotten regime but is there such thing as a a 'substantial' six figure bid in modern day Championship terms? The most it could possibly be is £999,999 which would not be a substantial sum for a Championship football club, especially not one used to selling players for 10x that amount every transfer window. What was it 12 months ago 'substantial investment ' ? 2 Quote
roversfan99 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 22 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: Ricky, The past is the past. Nothing we can do about that. No-one has said everything is all roses. Reading things that aren't being said by myself the biggest clue was last week when Ismael revealed he had spoken to the owners on the phone, Neither JDT and Eustace did that. I see that as a key difference between our situation now and then. Nicko has posted a story we have a bid rejected for Reyes Clearly who played for Barnsley and can play anywhere across the front line. He also said we want Ben Gibson. All the best for New Year Ricky You said the following: "Of course we are ready. We are putting bids in for players. The research has been done Its the first 5 words which almost make everyone else seem ridiculous for doubting that everything is ready and set to go to plan. Ismael said he wants the deals done by the Hull game. He said maybe 1 will drag but most should be done early. Whether that happens and the quality of those deals if they do, we shall see. Maybe this phone call to the cretins is going to make a revolutionary difference and we will buy loads of quality. I doubt it though. 2 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 46 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: the biggest clue was last week when Ismael revealed he had spoken to the owners on the phone, Neither JDT and Eustace did that. I see that as a key difference between our situation now and then. Bloody hell, you'll believe anything any old guff Nixon/the Club come out with. Do you believe in fairies and unicorns as well? 3 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 46 minutes ago, JHRover said: So Nixon says 'substantial' six figure bid rejected for the Barnsley lad. I know he's partly employed to put a shine on all things Rovers under the rotten regime but is there such thing as a a 'substantial' six figure bid in modern day Championship terms? The most it could possibly be is £999,999 which would not be a substantial sum for a Championship football club, especially not one used to selling players for 10x that amount every transfer window. Doesn't matter whether it's £100,000 or £999,999. It's been rejected apparently so we're no further forward if that's true. 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 46 minutes ago Author Posted 46 minutes ago 40 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: You said the following: "Of course we are ready. We are putting bids in for players. The research has been done Its the first 5 words which almost make everyone else seem ridiculous for doubting that everything is ready and set to go to plan. Cos that's what been reported. Do you have any info that's what has been reported today is wrong? Have we not a bid for Reyes Clearly? Is that your info? 40 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Ismael said he wants the deals done by the Hull game. He said maybe 1 will drag but most should be done early. Yes yet again, fully aware of what Ismael has said. 40 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Whether that happens and the quality of those deals if they do, we shall see. Would Reyes Clearly be a quality signing then? 40 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: Maybe this phone call to the cretins is going to make a revolutionary difference and we will buy loads of quality. I doubt it though. History tell you direct contact with owners helps you here. Bowyer and Mowbray had that. Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 44 minutes ago Author Posted 44 minutes ago 22 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: Bloody hell, you'll believe anything any old guff Nixon/the Club come out with. Do you believe in fairies and unicorns as well? Nixon record is more than good enough. Who else cover Rovers with transfer stories? Without his stories this thread would be dead. Quote
KentExile Posted 41 minutes ago Posted 41 minutes ago 27 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: Bloody hell, you'll believe anything any old guff Nixon/the Club come out with. Do you believe in fairies and unicorns as well? Quote
roversfan99 Posted 40 minutes ago Posted 40 minutes ago Just now, chaddyrovers said: Cos that's what been reported. Do you have any info that's what has been reported today is wrong? Have we not a bid for Reyes Clearly? Is that your info? Yes yet again, fully aware of what Ismael has said. Would Reyes Clearly be a quality signing then? History tell you direct contact with owners helps you here. Bowyer and Mowbray had that. I am not contesting that we have bid for Cleary. I will assume that we did. But we havent signed him, the bid was not at an acceptable amount so it doesnt mean anything. Until if and when we sign him or indeed anyone, I am not convinced that we are all ready and well prepared. Similar guff comes out of the club before every window, we want to get players in early, players get linked etc. It doesnt mean anything. I cant say that I have ever seen Cleary play so I dont know. Seems to have impressed at Barnsley for half a season which is all there is to go on. Young and fairly untested, but seemingly quick and likes to do something alien to the rest of our squad and run with the ball. But big question marks around his position as I have touched on. I couldnt possibly say if he would be good or bad, and until he actually signs its an irrelevance. Neither Bowyer or Mowbray received continious backing by any means. We are also clearly desperate to cut the wage bill as much as we can. Quote
roversfan99 Posted 37 minutes ago Posted 37 minutes ago Alan Nixon's ego would grow even bigger if he heard anyone say that this thread would be dead without his rumours. Its a thread of opinions. What do people think we need, where we are short, which players we would sell etc. And as and when players are signed and let go, what people think. Its hardly reliant on Nixon gossip. The Cleary rumour didnt even start with him. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.