Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This was 9th January.

Initially they said hamstring injury and out for a month. Even if there was a setback with that injury, then why now would that mean out for season? Surely something new.

IMG_7666.jpeg

Posted
5 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

Well, does that not in itself indicate a problem behind the scenes or are you trying to suggest this season and the last couple of seasons are entirely par for the course everywhere?

I would say playing Kargbo for two games when he had a muscle tear, Cantwell being out for over two months with what was initially described as a "kick on the knee" and Gudjohnssen being potentially ruled out for the season shortly after returning to training and being initially diagnosed as out for 2 weeks are all highly irregular.

If they are being misdiagnosed then that would be down to the medical department so again il refer to the initial post I responded to 

Medical advice could also be being ignored I suppose 

All I was saying Is injuries and a lot of them happen every season here

Posted
5 minutes ago, rog of the rovers said:

image.png.f04ae4d0ea35cedde89550284be8dea3.png

So that would be 5 back, absoluyely no excuses if we get spanked in the next two games then. As he said, it's only down to injuries.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RTM08 said:

So that would be 5 back, absoluyely no excuses if we get spanked in the next two games then. As he said, it's only down to injuries.

Then he’ll make the excuse they need time to build up fitness bla bla bla.

Posted
1 minute ago, RTM08 said:

So that would be 5 back, absoluyely no excuses if we get spanked in the next two games then. As he said, it's only down to injuries.

Yeah, in a week's time (if the presser is correct) we'll only have 5 of the "13" out so no excuses whatsoever.

Well "officials" etc but not on injuries anyway.

Posted
1 minute ago, Theaxe15 said:

So did the Merciah get it wrong??

Seems, and hope, someone has been a tad mischievous.  You will note, I caveated with question mark and 'if correct'.

Let's see where we are next week then.

Surprised Montgomery might be back - weren't we advised 4 to 6 weeks?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Mercer said:

Seems, and hope, someone has been a tad mischievous.  You will note, I caveated with question mark and 'if correct'.

Let's see where we are next week then.

Surprised Montgomery might be back - weren't we advised 4 to 6 weeks?

Yeah, Ismael said that like 4-5 days ago.

Baffling.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Torgeir said:

Hope it's not the same 'sauce' claiming someone has bid for the club @Mercer

My 'peppercorn' doesn't normally 'talk' to me unless I've consumed too much red before eating .

If you mean 'source' then not the same.

 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Emerald Isle Rover said:

Ok was it the same source who told you there was a bid made for the club?

Nope

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...