arbitro Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Cantwell says the injury was caused by a hyperextension but Ismael has said the injury was caused by a kick. Normally a kick can be painful and might result in some bruising but the vagaries between the player and the managers explanation is quite alarming. 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 11 minutes ago, JHRover said: Afraid not Chadz Talk is free. Playing him costs. The only thing that will put rumours to be are if he plays through 50 games and is still here in February. maybe not for you. Does for me, as Todd says don't believe everything written on social media Quote
47er Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 17 minutes ago, arbitro said: Cantwell says the injury was caused by a hyperextension but Ismael has said the injury was caused by a kick. Normally a kick can be painful and might result in some bruising but the vagaries between the player and the managers explanation is quite alarming. I prefer the more likely explanation---we owe Rangers a bonus payment if he plays more than 50 games for us. Edited 3 hours ago by 47er 2 Quote
Miller11 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: maybe not for you. Does for me, as Todd says don't believe everything written on social media I think a better mantra is “Don’t believe most of what comes out of Blackburn Rovers employees mouths” 4 Quote
47er Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago On 27/11/2025 at 20:14, MarkBRFC said: Venkys, Pasha, Gestede, Ismael etc aren't stupid. They know exactly what they are doing. They know what they are doing but are still stupid. It'll end in tears. 1 Quote
London blue Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago "don't believe what you read on social media" I don't, and haven't. I've just been paying attention to the way this club has acted for the past however many years. It may well be an injury, but I won't be told I'm a moron for expecting the pricks running the show to keep doing what they've always done. 2 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago He needs to realise his bosses comments aren't helping matters he seems to be implying Todd is swinging the lead. Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Can I believe Cantwell when he uses social media to tell me to not always believe what’s said on social media? 🤔 8 Quote
KentExile Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, 47er said: I prefer the more likely explanation---we owe Rangers a bonus payment &/or Todd gets a payrise if he plays more than 50 games for us. fixed it for you 😉 Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said: maybe not for you. Does for me, as Todd says don't believe everything written on social media But you believe everything the Club puts out on social media? Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 hour ago, JHRover said: Afraid not Chadz Talk is free. Playing him costs. The only thing that will put rumours to be are if he plays through 50 games and is still here in February. This. Quote
M_B Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago 58 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said: But you believe everything the Club puts out on social media? It does get like Jackanory on here once an idea gets started. Quote
RevidgeBlue Posted 42 minutes ago Posted 42 minutes ago 28 minutes ago, M_B said: It does get like Jackanory on here once an idea gets started. Cantwell is getting treated by Ismael like Travis did. Drop a grenade of innuendo without any specific detail and retreat to a safe distance. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.