Agreed and if the club are asked about a budget, they usually hide behind, not wanting to show their hand. Given the last few windows and the lack of funds coming in from the owners, I can't see how, we can possibly be signing the number and quality required.

What's your opinion of what this will cost and how much do you think will be available form either self- Generated funds ( Wharton sell on clause) and money from the owners?

I think offers have been made to tidy the place up and those offers were declined. I know of a local glazier, who had to threaten the club, after carrying out some work and not being paid. A fan of the club too, so it goes to show, what a shoestring budget we have.

I think most people can see the way this is heading, as they could under Coyle. The decision makers were warned by many fans that appointing Coyle, would end in disaster and despite the calls to terminate him, fairly early on, it was thought by some, that he should be given a chance and had he been axed, even 3 weeks sooner that what he was, then maybe, we would have stayed up. The same is happening all over again and we can be pretty sure that a poor end to this season and a poor start to next, will be ignored, until it is too late.

That's exactly what I said on Twitter. If anything the state of the weeds, the ground and the wall, could have more impact than the banner, in terms of shaming the people who are supposed to be looking after their baby. For owners, who never refuse to sign a cheque, can it be requested that they send one to clean the filth at the ground up.

The worry is, he might carry on learning and he will know an awful lot, about losing.

As we know, there were rumours in here about the previous manager being unhappy and looking to move and that turned out to be true. Sad as it sounds, hopefully this is true too, as it can’t be brushed off that everything is good at the club, if it turns out to be true.

Or he needs to be closer to the channel tunnel and a train ride home.

Deaf, but I see what you did there.

Can he not write another letter to the fans? Big mistake that one and the words in there are looking sillier by the day.

I will gladly kick him in the bollocks if he did. I thought he was a scam bag before, but if this is true, he needs chasing straight out of the club. Enough, is enough

It would not surprise me. He and several others know the are being found out. Fans care about the club and can see how rotten it is and how many fraudsters there are making decisions right now, From the owners, to the chancers making the decisions including the one picking and supposedly motivating them team, not one has any passion or respect. These people are muck on the bottom of our shoes and arguing with fans, who pay their money and love the club, says it all, Breaking point has been reached and there is no return now for all of these scum bags. Filth of the highest order has infiltrated our once proud club.

You called my team VERY unbalanced in the other thread, but bar one, have the same 10 outfield players.

Yes

I bet he starts Forshaw.

You trust the people running the club a lot more than I do. If they have done it in the past, I’m sure they would do it again and it seems to me, that keeping the club as a self funding operation, is more important than success on the pitch. My line up yesterday, would have been. Toth Brittain. Hyam. Carter. Ribeiro Jrc. Travis. Tronstad. Buckley Dennis Gueye. Have a listen to the Bennett podcast and see if you still trust the decision makers as much as you currently seem to.

Whether he turns out to be good or not, the length of the contract is plain crazy.

He was on the bench last night, so must have been available.

There is now way, I would have started with either Sanderson or Forshaw and there is a strong argument for leaving Cantwell on the bench too. I would have gone with Transtad from the start and just see how he went, as I go agree that it would have been a bit of a risk, but given that he came on anyway, I think that would be validated. I would have had JRC in for Cantwell and Buckley in midfield instead of playing 3/5 at the back. Have you listened to the Elliott Bennett podcast, where he states that he was told that Mowbray had to limit his starts, due to finances and have you not heard it from yesteryear with the like of Solgado, Nelson, Etc? Would you totally dismiss, the possibility under this regime of a team being picked for financial reasons, rather than the best available to win the game? I am not saying, I am correct by the way, but the starting lineup twice so far under this manager, have been questionable, in my opinion.

I think Coyle used the excuse of signings were not made and once the window closed and he had what he wanted, things would change. Of course they didn’t and as we know that appointment led to relegation and as we have heard with the Elliott Bennett podcast, he described Coyle, as the worst manager he has worked under. I already get the impression that some of the players have grave doubts about this manager, so if he is also given the time to bring in his own players, during the summer window, let’s hope we don’t have history repeating itself.

I’m convinced that certain elements of the team selection is based on cost and not ability. Choose the right players and then play the right system and then e have a chance. The line up and the tactics were woeful, last night and on Saturday.

The club don’t deserve fans like you. If only some of these fraudsters masquerading as Rovers officials, put as much effort in as you and some of the others, of your ilk, then we would have guaranteed success. Sadly they aren’t for to lace your boots.

I know we had it at the very beginning and hopefully it isn't but these owners have a track record of hiring a manager, who will front up and say the strangest of things, whenever there seems to be a need to do so. If he starts to spout how any new signings are the new this and the new that,, then start to worry. So far as I am concerned, the length of this guys contract and his performance in his last 2 posts, simply do not warrant this and I am not saying this, after the horse has bolted, as I have already gone on record with this, but I found the Allez le Bleus letter very perplexing and unnecessary at the time, but it may be my suspicious mind.

There is certainly a bit too much secrecy here at the minute and it feels like it is a bit hard to support. I genuinely do want to become a member, but the feedback from current membership, does not encourage me to do so.

Would anyone on here by happy still buying, knowing that Waggott got a bonus, if certain targets were reached?