Hasta

It also got picked up and shared by one of the national football social media groups on Facebook yesterday, which is possibly why Rovers only commented yesterday.

Millers face is the giveaway for me. No arguing. Looks like he knows there has been contact.

I think it was McLaughlin, hence why he got booked, and to be fair he does take the man out but the loose ball is picked up by another Birmingham player.

Does anyone have the Granada tribute programme which was shown after Jack died. It used to be on YouTube in 3 parts in low quality, but it got pulled due to copyright on Sarah Brightman’s “Time to say Goodbye” at the end.

If we’d have won it 1-0 I’d have said foot solid performance the kind which we are going to have to put in as we won’t score a lot of goals. Defensively and shape-wise we were solid. The problem is we got undone due to lack of quality / depth, which is something we are going to have to get used to because some of these lads are going to struggle at this level. As I said earlier, Travis is first choice midfield. If we are to ‘replace him’ as Val said, then it needs to be someone who is also first choice starter. That’s replacing him. Not ending up with another backup squad player.

Yeah I know. It had me confused for about 10 minutes at the start.

Fair summary, except I presume you mean McLaughlin. Wharton only came on at the end.

What if he had spent nearly 12 months unemployed and not been able to get a job. Then was told he could have a 3.5 year contract at a Championship club in transition, who would have to lose key players this summer to cut the wage budget and would be relying on academy and cheap signings. Having seen the club was still in the top 6 he may have thought he could still do a decent job at it. Surely he knows what’s happened to the previous managers.

Why isn’t he saying I hope we bring more quality in, rather than saying we need just 1 more player, plus replacements if any leave. Because he’s working to a script.

You see that’s where I struggle. Im not 100% certain he didn’t know.

Senior player. Probably not happy Eustace left. Decent wage.

Officially 19,552 which would be about 12,500 Rovers fans. Having said that the concourse was light so I suspect a few season ticket holder s counted in there were absent for one reason or another.

Lot of effort and generally we were ok. However pieces of poor play combined to see us lose it. De Neve, Tavares and Miller have to stop that situation before the penalty. Tavares corner is shocking, as is the decision to commit so many men that far forward. Not sure who the defender is who doesn’t even stick a leg out to stop the cross for the winner. As Travis is clearly first choice midfielder then his promised ‘replacement’ should also be first choice. Let’s wait and see.

So don’t come out, smile and say it’s going to be an exciting summer. Gestede knows the game, and they’ve removed GB and employed Gestede to make sure they have a patsy to implement it. He’s not going to rock the boat and try and negotiate more funds for the players like I suspect previous people may have done, so in my mind he’s complicit. The jury is out on VI on this point.

I’m fuming because they have the fucking bare face cheek to say in public that they “remain committed” to open communication, when every fan groups attending meetings with them agree that trying to communicate with them is bullshit. We’ve got a first team coach / former interim head coach, who the the current head coach says has left. But the board cant confirm. “Open communication”. I can’t understand how people can’t see the problem here by looking outside the manufactured Travis ‘smokescreen’.

How can you refuse to accept and publish minutes of a fans forum meeting which all different fan groups attending agree are accurate, and then say they are committed to “open communication.”

Unlucky. Niall was phenomenal. Good effort through and a great distraction through the last few weeks.

No. He didn’t like not being offered a new contract when he wanted one, and then a popular manager he had a bond with leaving due to the club refusing to show ambition with the current players or the squad in general. Probably doesn’t care one bit what Val said.

Bradford’s last win at Ewood was 1921, until last Tuesday.

Ok. No probs. I tend to post, then reread and correct and I thought you were criticising the unedited grammar / spelling.

Didn’t realise someone would quote me 20 seconds after I posted before I proof read it.

“Trav wants to leave because we didn’t offer him a contract when he would have signed, and now myself, Rudy and Pasha are running the ship he doesn’t like our attitude or lack of ambition. Therefore he’s got a better offer we won’t match so he’s off”

On Tuesday we played a kid keeper and another youngster in Montgomery. There's an argument the rest are generally first team or in close contention. The only real excuse is a few of them are new to English football this summer. I think most of us will admit that there wasn't a ton of changes we could make that would make us significantly stronger. Keeper obviously. We expect a long old season. I'll not type it again but you can see the reasons why in my post here on another thread. Good luck at Stoke.

Cue the next person to say "but we still need to keep communicating", whilst all those that have genuinely gone out of their way to try this like @K-Hod and @Mike Graham are saying it is futile.