Mattyblue

The ‘club’ want a side full of young, academy grads and ‘development’ players. How many of said types of players were on the pitch by the end? Ergo how much higher should we be? This is what the owners/the club want, feel free to remove this guy and GB will bring in another with the same remit.

‘Progressive’ Jim 😁

That era was a conveyor belt of mediocre loans that came and went without anybody noticing…

How’s that happened? 😫

The Marie Antoniette of brfcs 😁

Think you know the answer to that! Bit like when all night games were supposed to be £20 behind the goal… until they realised they could rinse a decent Sunderland following. And now with Wigan and Blackpool midweek that’s half of the Cat A fixtures down the toilet… so how about you don’t decide on each game’s category before the season kicks off when so many fixtures are subject to change!

So he is someone who has no issues sacking staff then?

How the bloody hell is roversfan99 from Blackburn going to know that 😁 .

And in midfield?

Bringing in experienced players, perish the thought!

Fair play to you for keep on trying but as the latest response shows you can only debate with someone that has actual comprehension and reasoning skills.

You do make me laugh Mercer, if PNE had just bought him you’d be decrying our lack of ambition in contrast to that lot down the road…

But as Sky call the shots with the EFL it wouldn’t surprise me if the Wigan game stayed where it was, the fifth round tie is then played on the Thursday and the Saturday game pushed to the Sunday.

End of the day does it matter what managers come out with in press conferences? All a load of platitudes, which is to be expected when they have to face up to the media over and over again. Results, dear boy, results.

Don’t disagree, but obviously roverandout thinks he should be in front of some of those in your list.

Of course top players go on loan, but your examples were at a club at a much higher level, so not really a fair comparison. Is roverandout’s point not that he’s as good as any other player we already have at this second tier level? So should be in our team, not some L1/L2 team. Of course that’s debatable, and he may benefit from a loan, because if he should be playing or not, he currently isn’t, but it wasn’t particularly debatable that Kane wasn’t ready for a team chasing the CL as a teenager so needed loaning out.

That’s that then, bet he’s relieved.

Usual platitudes from owners and directors about a ‘transition period’ and ‘it’s a project’. It isn’t ‘Abramovich’s Chelsea anymore’, yet they’ve spent £300 million in about eight months under this new fella! He keeps losing games at a club like Chelsea and he’ll be gone sharpish, simple as that.

Considering we’ve had Steele and Walton as the main keeper here he definitely is someone that could end up as first choice (good enough or not).

The LT have got that wrong. The minutes are stating just under 9,300 in total including the 400 half STs. Nothing will change until he fecks off, alas this long signposted retirement never seems to come to fruition…

https://www.rovers.co.uk/news/2023/january/12/lead-the-lads-out-in-the-emirates-fa-cup-at-ewood-park-/ You used to get a kit as part of the mascot package (£300), and still do at other clubs, now we have so little stock/so skint you can’t even apply if your kid hasn’t already got one of his own. There’s that small time operation again.

So why does the PNE manager who has them in 10th place ‘know what he’s doing’, whilst the fella who has Rovers in 3rd (and had six months less time in post) doesn’t?

Just about scraped over 9,000 STs (with half STs included) and he’s crowing about the revenue. Forget about trying to grow the fanbase, just keep rinsing that core. Small time ‘leader’ overseeing a small time operation.

I get that we may not have seen the best of him as he looks like a fish on a bicycle at full back, but on what evidence would he be ‘cracking’ in midfield?

Good job we keep winning plenty then, isn’t it!