Our local media aren’t interested in holding the club/the manager to account. Interviews with TM are just an exercise in teeing up soft questions that will get a few quotable lines for the next article/radio package without rocking the boat. The LT especially know that paper sales/website traffic is heavily reliant on sport coverage, so the last thing they want is to upset the local football clubs with the financial state local papers are in. All the President’s Men, it ain’t...

Not just Sky, even The Times is at it. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/vertical-football-and-intense-press-has-barnsley-dreaming-of-premier-league-return-pp3s6kz5c ‘Blackburn Rovers visited Oakwell last month Tony Mowbray did something pretty remarkable. The Rovers manager is well known for his commitment to expansive, possession-based football’ The rest of the article is behind the paywall, but it generally goes on to say how prosaic and hard to watch Barnsley are. Their fans must be hating their charge up the table, if only they could be more ‘expansive’ like us. £10 a game’s a bargain to watch such delights!

Exactly that arbito. I know I’m being naive in thinking we are ‘the club’, that it is part of all of us. But to see these here today, gone tomorrow low rent carpet baggers having the brass neck to dismantle our top notch infrastructure just makes me feel sick

What a marvellous stand the Riverside was... and its replacement looked outdated about two years after it was opened.

Up the NIMBYs!

I imagine Evans is one of our top earners, get him out of the door in June for a start and who knows...

We had their settee...

Always had a Phil Foden-esque gait to him (yes, a poor man’s etc), but has struggled with the physical side. Last night, he did a little shift of his hips to beat his man, and got to the byline to put a ball across for Dack and the Stockport Phil vibes were strong...

Still a year left on his deal and relatively big wages (he signed his last contract just before they kicked off their last PL campaign) would be the issue re Trybull, you’d think...

Thought Trybull was excellent, does the Evans role, but with actual technical ability. His problem seems to be attitude, as there’s definitely a player there at this level.

And why are Huddersfield doing so badly? And why did we nearly leave the division the wrong way in 2013 instead of bouncing straight back? Perhaps, just maybe, there’s a lot going on with relegated clubs on and off the pitch and it isn’t just as simplistic as parachutes = success, ay?

Of course it would, one of the naivest articles I’ve ever read in my life. Just shows you can post as many graphs about xG and the like as you want, but can still have so little insight into what makes football and footballers tick...

‘Baffled’, he was. https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/9400785.steve-kean-baffled-blackburn-rovers-protests-continue-despite-win/

Bit of an odd response 1864, you’ve gone from setting up a supporters group at Ewood WMC that existed to hold the club to account, to now just blindly taking their word on a vital part of Blackburn Rovers’ infrastructure...

Of course. If his trajectory had been 21st, 16th, 15th, 11th, 15th (so far) instead of 22nd, 2nd, 11th, 15th (so far) he’d have lost the supporters a long time ago - just like Bowyer.

‘Quizzed at the end of the season’... has to be Rovers then as that’s the only time of the year the owners take any kind of interest.

Nixon version... https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/14260689/tony-mowbray-blackburn-owners-boss-replacement-sack/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

Unless it’s Allardyce, of course...

Definitely. Bowyer did well initially but there was never any particular affection for him considering the mess he inherited as a total rookie, the flirtation with the play offs, good cup runs etc. Largely due to the fact, in my opinion, that the fanbase still had fairly high expectations for the club at that stage, the L1 stint has seen those standards drop markedly.

100% right on that score, think there’s a bit of denial to just how popular he is in the ‘real world’ (not just on FB groups etc) on here..

I’d say he still has plenty of support with the core support. These big divides are what happens when you have a club with no leadership or clear decision making structures, these things drag on and on, the manager is the only spokesman for the club and the normal scenarios in football - I.e poor form, going backwards = sack, don’t exist here. But there’s no point in getting wound up either way, as said previously ‘the club’ can do no wrong with many these days, so just like keeping him in post is obviously the right thing to do, if a bad run in the next few led to his sacking (obviously not something that would actually happen), that would also be a wise move from our learned owners.

Millwall and Bristol City are/were the most winnable games until Easter, so an absolutely vital 3 points yesterday. Let’s see where we are at the international break with Swansea, Brentford, Norwich coming up.

He’s not going anywhere, so absolutely no point in the old... ‘it’s worth a defeat if it means...’ versus ‘I NEVER want my club to lose’ debate. Lets just get to 50 points.

Judging social media and the rapturous following he still has, at least we can look forward to bumper crowds next season 😏

There’s no actual ambition to get promoted, that’s fairly obvious in the way the club is structured and run. So on what grounds would he be sacked as long as we are comfortable enough in the Championship? (Losing money hand over fist aside, but there’s no ambition to stem that either, short term cash grab at Brockhall aside).