Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS, SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

roversinmyblood

Members
  • Posts

    856
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by roversinmyblood

  1. Been following Rovers for about 56 years, was a season ticket holder for 15 years, but now exiled in Devon. Ken Furphy was my father-in-law (who resided in Devon) one reason why my wife wanted to move to Devon and away from my beloved Rovers. 

  2. Because of our lack of cash at the time, it would have been all they could pay so not agreeing to the ridiculous sell on fee would not have allowed the deal to be completed. They had us over a barrel.
  3. Last year was “the year” to get in the top six. Unfortunately the manager’s tactics of possession play was nullified by some canny managers and other managers followed suit. TM had no answer to these counter tactics and was found clueless as to how to turn it around. In fairness though, the pitch at Ewood post Christmas was appalling and did not suit his possession based tactics especially against a high press. Unfortunately we didn’t have a Danny Graham type player to go direct. This year is going to one of survival and rebuild as we live with the consequences of FFP. If we sell AA it may allow a little money to spend, but I don’t have the confidence that it would be spent well. AA would at least allow us to survive and maybe prosper if we kept him, but it’s a big ask to expect him to do as well as last season. The possibility of relegation this year would probably be the death knell of the club.
  4. Have you seen the quality of the goals he has scored for Shrewsbury?
  5. I think that he has the same attributes as AA, pace, balance and a good shot with either foot. Defending is not something he likes to do, but AA improved when he played as a CF because he didn’t have to chase back and defend. He is a confidence player who needs to be loved to get the best out of him. Make him the main man and he could be our answer if we lost AA.
  6. Joe a quick question. Why would Lewis Thompson be released, I thought he was earmarked for a first team future?
  7. We are also ill equipped to battle for points as we don’t have enough fighters in the team.
  8. Sorry but they are anything but good enough. Much too lightweight and easily muscled off the ball. Too many not interested in receiving the ball or putting a tackle in.
  9. Surely we couldn’t afford the additional salary required.
  10. There is no point having loads of forwards on if there is nobody to provide the chances. Clueless!!
  11. We needed midfield players to create things, but the whole game we were light weight there. You have to win the midfield battles and create pressure, we couldn’t do that because we had too many forwards on who just weren’t good enough. Travis was working his nuts off and Davenport did well whilst he was on, but why take him off?!! Elliot hasn’t been good enough for a few games now, it’s like playing with 10 men when he doesn’t perform. What formation was TM playing? He is a bit clueless at times. Throwing a load of forwards on and hoping they will come up with something is not tactics. Why have we gone back to hoof ball when the pitch seemed in decent nick. It meant that we couldn’t get a decent head of speed going. Dack was also completely ineffective. Maybe I should really have calmed down before I posted, but I feel so frustrated right now. No real tactics so we got what we deserved. Nothing!!
  12. If it gets us close then I will still consider it a success as we will be more likely to attract good signings (permanent) in the future to enable another crack at promotion. Also losing games playing our young players who are not ready might bring fears of relegation and have the opposite effect on future player recruitment.
  13. Totally agree, the CH loans are only there to cover a disaster of an injury crisis in that position. It will also set us up well for any future star player loans. We can’t afford to buy quality permanent signings so it serves us well to get these players in. If our youngsters were currently good enough they would be playing. They still need to develop further before they can play in the first team. If Pickering is an upgrade he should be playing for helping us get promoted rather than being loaned back.
  14. I agree he is way too soft. The amount of money he wastes by being “a decent sort of caring manager” we could have made up the difference in value with the Pickering deal. It’s very frustrating. I don’t think any of the 30 plus year olds should be given new contracts as their legs will not be able to provide the high intensity that our play demands. Any money should be used to protect our young assets.
  15. We are second to every ball!! Unbelievable.
  16. Travis is way off being match fit, he seems rooted to the floor all the time.
  17. There is no bite in our midfield, we are too slow to react. We look one paced.
  18. I think Buckley is a bit like, for those who can remember him, Lee Mackel. He was highly talented and arrived with great expectations, but sadly never fulfilled his promise.
  19. Not if he is only costing us £2K per week- cheap at the price.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.