Jump to content

47er

Members
  • Posts

    23422
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by 47er

  1. So long as it doesn't go a bit Myles!
  2. Hard not to laugh at this story! We knew he was a set get now we know he's thick as well.
  3. I don't see that that post of KHod's is actually punishing anyone., he's just giving his opinion.You continue to divide us into being on one side or the other which I find irritating but no-one is punishing you. As for Chaddy, he is invariably over-optimistic, often self-contradictory and therefore provokes a response----imo of course.
  4. Give it a rest for god's sake.
  5. I asked this! Several times! Once the media got on to the fact that we are willing to pay what seems a lot of money for him I thought that would alert them and we'd lose him. But no interest at all. Let's hope their loss is our gain. But it does seem odd Jim!
  6. RED HAIR! Always get cracking mid-fielders with gingers. Tough terriers!
  7. All the doubts about the Brereton deal were based on Forrest having rejected our bid for 6M and demanding double! No need to be embarrassed about that! If we get him for 6M, then its a different story and much less of a risk. We still have too many mid-fielders and not enough wide, and still need another centre-back. Sort those 2 out and get Brereton for 6M and I'm a happy man and I think we all would be.
  8. We all(?) agree we need another centre-back for when (not if) either Lenihan or Mulgrew are unavailable. That's why TM pursued Bauer for so long but Charlton haven't shifted. So it now seems that the additional centre-back will be Rodwell! I see that as a huge risk and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise. Most of us believe we need Chapman or someone like him. It looks as if the striker issue is settled. That's where it sits for me and we have till Friday to sort it out.
  9. Yes but the problem with that is you weren't wrong!!!
  10. I'd have preferred Edwards. How did we miss that one? Ticks every box. Maybe if Ipswich get relegated?.....
  11. I'm not arguing with you mate just agreeing! We had him for one year already, he's signed a new contract for 3 years, that makes a total of 4! Yes?
  12. OK he's up there though! I was only joking anyway. On another point, what a great thread.
  13. If I'd been your Dad I'd have cut off your jib there and then!
  14. Right. So was he originally contracted for 3 years and now we have another 3 making 4 in total if you get my meaning? Still no pressure to sell him though at this time or near future.
  15. "If" and if he hasn't forgotten how.
  16. We have him for 4 years, absolutely no reason to sell him for 3 years. And I hope we are back in the Premiership before then.
  17. i've got one of yours Stuart. In reply to me you said it was wrong to judge Delfuenso on the strength of one game!!!
  18. I welcomed the purchase of Rovers by Venkys!! For about a week! Do I win?
  19. Its a lot of money for a youngster still learning the game but its almost certainly the best we can do. So good luck to the lad and what's the next target?!
  20. I think "some people" feel the Club misled them, many of these "stories" came from Ewood.
  21. Well I am prepared to wait 6 days but even then it'll be weeks before the best side is up and running. Exactly what we wanted to avoid. As for the QPR striker, I completely agree----scraping the barrel.
  22. He sounds exactly like Delfouenso!
  23. So let's ignore Mack the Lad's post above, somebody whose a first-hand witness as to how Rodwell has played and behaved over several years in favour of believing what we want to believe eh? Bit like Climate Change or Brexit it seems to me.
×
×
  • Create New...