Jump to content

wilsdenrover

Members
  • Posts

    8933
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

Everything posted by wilsdenrover

  1. It may depend on whether any decision by the Adjudicating Authority is deemed to be a conviction (I don’t think it will be). If it was, they may be caught by 2.1.8(b)(i) of the Owners’ and Directors’ Test (under disqualify event)
  2. He’ll let you know once the club has spoken.
  3. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
  4. Please don’t let the Venkys be part of the 5%.
  5. They need to ‘defend’ themselves to the Adjudicating Authority but them saying they intend to do so (if indeed they do*) may well get brought up on Wednesday. * I think we all know they will. Re your new show analogy - do you think we’re at the stage where we know it will be shit but we’re sticking with it anyways 😁😁
  6. Sell on fees are the only financial commitments a club is allowed to make whilst under a fee restriction.
  7. As every one seems to be in here, I’ve done a little update in the Venky court case thread. I wouldn’t rush to go read it though but just so you all know it’s there…
  8. @paullarrygher Delhi High Court updated their website a while ago, perhaps that’s why it no longer loads for you? This is the link I use https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/
  9. Point 3 is the interesting one for me, this complaint (if I’ve understood the procedure correctly) is the ED saying to the Adjudicating Authority that they believe the Venkys have a case to answer (re their investigation). Respondent no 2 is the Directorate of Enforcement. edited to add: Just checked and it’s listed as the sixth case to be heard on Wednesday - who thinks I need to set my alarm??
  10. A model he’d have been aware of when he joined.
  11. Let’s stop this Derby Rovers bollocks before it becomes a thing eh.
  12. What motivation is there for a young player to improve if better/more experienced players are just moved aside to keep their ‘pathways’ clear? First team opportunities should be earned.
  13. My only issue with this is it’s entirely the club’s fault (by not sorting out contracts sooner) that we’re in a transitional state. We finished seventh last season, any half functioning club would have been pushing to strengthen in a bid to reach the play offs. That being said, none of this is the new players fault so I agree they need time to show whether they’re good enough. The concern however would be, if they aren’t of sufficient standard, I wouldn’t trust our lot to resolve the situation in January (given the past few winter windows).
  14. Harder to bring in banners if only small bags are allowed…
  15. They tried to but he was spinning too fast.
  16. 🤷‍♂️ hopefully we’ll find out soon.
  17. I’ve heard he does his best work in and around the box.
  18. Looks like he falls one point short. He’d have got that point if they’d qualified for Europe through the league (they did so through the cup). A good argument to make to the exceptions panel??
  19. Let’s hope he doesn’t fall out with the supporters of the Smit might hit the fan. I’ll get my coat…
×
×
  • Create New...