All Activity
- Past hour
-
Rovers's January transfer needs
davulsukur replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I think that whole assessment is absolutely spot on 👌 -
BRFC - The Nostalgia Thread
SIMON GARNERS 194 replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Another gem of similar quality... -
v Ipswich Town (h) - 20/9/25
ElTwis replied to Herbie6590's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Afternoon all, apologies for dragging this one up again! I've seen a post via the x page of kidderstnoise suggesting ticket holders for this (presumably if you didn't then take a half price ticket for the rearranged game) are entitled to a 40% refund as per the efl policy. I've emailed the club who state that's not the case, has anyone had any success with this? -
Rovers's January transfer needs
chaddyrovers replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I hope he proves me wrong and find a role within the team that means his performances was very good every week. I will hold my hands up and admit I was wrong -
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
Mashed Potatoes replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Come off it. The blueprint for our path was created in 2010. You seem to be the only person who has failed to see that. -
Rovers's January transfer needs
bluebruce replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I think we are all in the same boat then. - Today
-
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
RevidgeBlue replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
We won't recover because we're carrying on down the path he created the blue print for and put us on. In fact we seem to be doubling down on it. His previous Clubs recovered because they went in a different direction after he left. The only thing you can say about his tenure was at least he didnt get away with putting houses on part of Brockhall as he similarly tried and failed to do at Coventry. -
v Portsmouth (a) - 13/12/25
KidderStreetNoise replied to Elrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
That back 5 is terrifying -
Michael Vaughan on BBC was saying its time for Stokes batting 3 in the next test. With Will Jacks to bat 6/7. Pope should be drop. What do people think? Any regular county watchers who can say who are the up and coming opening batsman/number 3 in the county scene?
-
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
Tomphil2 replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Waggot was brought in to just squeeze every penny he could out of the limited means he had. His whole career was based around that as was his philosophy which he'd already stated in various early interviews. Squeeze what you have till it pops...and it did. However at times he did have leeway in the budgets some of which was spent well on fees and wages but equally as much was wasted. Mowbray was also part of all that both good stuff and not so good. Slippery Steve though was brought in for those specific reasons in the first paragraph and as time went on his and TM's methods weren't really taking us anywhere other than water treading. It seems the owners were happy with that for a while then got fed up and taking the usual bad advice thinking they could pay less but get similar for the money the cutbacks began. This is where Steve & Suhail were in their element, easy money until cracks obviously formed in that partnership. One wanting frees/loans/cheap deals but experience and bigger wages. The other wanting youth, potential but small fees AND wages plus cuts to cheaper across experienced club staff as well. Including Stevo and now here we are, no mans land but as JH hinted at removing Waggot whatever his limitations etc has removed the one bit of football stewardship experience there actually was there. Suhail, long been my opinion, now with Rudy are just a pair of agent stooges. -
Blackburn Rovers Women
StHelensRover replied to Proudtobeblue&white's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Thanks for confirming. I think I meant automatic relegation but forgot to be specific. Even if we aren't automatically relegated, these horrible owners will probably ask for us to be relegated again at least one more division to 'find our level', we'll soon be running round on public parks playing against pub teams. -
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
roversfan99 replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I am looking forward to seeing us recover then similar to how healthy we were in the Venkys years before he arrived. To say that he specifically is the architecht of the downsizing of this club is absolutely ludicrious even for you. He may well have played a small part in enabling it but come on. -
Blackburn Rovers Women
davulsukur replied to Proudtobeblue&white's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Looks to be 2 tiers below them, goes to regional level. Tier 5 - North West Regional Football League, Prem division Tier 6 - North West Regional Football League Div 1 -
v Portsmouth (a) - 13/12/25
joey_big_nose replied to Elrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
I am a bit confused who is actually available on this one? I would really consider going four at the back as I think without Hedges on the left 352 to doesn't really work. And that's going to get even more difficult when Alebiousu goes away.... And we can give one of the strikers a bit of rest. A thought that has occured to me is if we should go 433? Might suit us a bit better than 4231. Pears Alebiousu Miller McCloughlin Riberio TGH Tronstad Cantwell Morishita Ohashi De Neve Subs : Michalski, Pratt, Pickering, Baradji, Henricksson, Tavers, Gudjohnsen, Gueye, Tyjon? -
Rovers's January transfer needs
davulsukur replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
He's the last of the famous 5 (Tronstad, Travis, Hyam, Brittain & Dolan) that we really needed to keep hold of and build a team around this summer. Plan seems to be working well so far............ -
Rovers's January transfer needs
simongarnerisgod replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
he wants to go back to norway next season,family reasons i think -
Rovers's January transfer needs
KentExile replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
bonkers yes, but also cheaper, which is what matters to them most -
Rovers's January transfer needs
Torgeir replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
It's total bonkers that we're not offering Tronstad a new contract. -
Rovers's January transfer needs
joey_big_nose replied to chaddyrovers's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Tavares seems to me to want to be the sort of player Nzonzi was. Technically good, deeper midfielder, who picks the ball off the defence and picks passes. But as others have said that really relies on being very aware of where players are around you, have really good ball control on the turn to find space, find the right pass and off the ball be physically competitive, and close down the danger. On all those he isn't anywhere near it. What I find absolutely unacceptable about him (as does Ismael obviously in leaving him out of squads) is he doesn't seem to even try and do the basics well (i.e. cover ground, be aware, get a tackle in). I have seen a tiny improvement from him in the last couple of games.... but the issue is even when he tries a bit he is so far behind play. It would be a really remarkable thing if he can get up to speed. -
Blackburn Rovers Women
StHelensRover replied to Proudtobeblue&white's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Rock bottom of the 4th division without a single point. They were deliberately relegated two divisions and it's very soon about to be 3 divisions. (Edit- I dunno whether there's relegation this low down the women's pyramid. I'm guessing the damage is so catastrophic that they won't recover from this for years, our name is complete mud in the women's game, we're more likely to fold). Is that what our owners think of providing opportunities to young women in the sport? Our billionaire owners who love our club. -
Only loan I could see being recalled would be O'Riordan. He can cover at centre back with Wharton and Carter still out, would allow Miller to shift to RWB if needed also. I still think we'll just shove Hedges at RWB and be done with it.
-
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
RevidgeBlue replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Not having a go at you, We're pretty much in full agreement on everything overall. The only thing that's changed imo is since Waggott left the veneer has slipped slightly and we see what a husk the Club really is. He sat there in the 3 stooges interview defending everything that had happened and endorsing the lunatic policy of "transition" this season. He supposedly wanted another year on his £500 k plus remuneration package. He was CEO when they failed to back Eustace. etc etc -
We have a few players already in that category !
-
Blackburn Rovers Women
TheKitGuy replied to Proudtobeblue&white's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Away to Cheadle Town stingers this weekend - we suffered a 2-0 loss against them. This was our first game in this new league. They sit 4th having Won 7 Drawn 1 and Lost 2 -
Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas
SIMON GARNERS 194 replied to DuffsLeftPeg's topic in Blackburn Rovers Fans Messageboard
Thought this also. Just wonder if Waggott is sat watching this unfold laughing his bollox off. Sweet revenge for when they hung him out to dry before the media regarding the 'we listened to Steve and cheap tickets dont work' blame game.He looked far from happy imo.
