philipl Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Seems that the NotW is on a one paper mission to wreck England's World Cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
blue/white Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Phil you read my mind.... are NOTW Brasil in disguise? If find it very odd that this so-called paper has embarked on this dodgy mission now as the calendar rounded in January... very odd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ste B Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 read the bbc boards I aint posting any links or stories, dont want to get this site in trouble 381644[/snapback] I've deleted a few posts from here discussing this for that reason. Lets just leave it at the rumours of the NOTW trying to undermine Englands World Cup chances. Perhaps Jim could shed some light on their motives, being Murdochs bitch and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speeeeeeedie Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 How can the BBC boards post allsorts of rumours and this site cannot do a thing? The BBC topic board is quite blatent; have a read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 It's always been the policy on this board. We really don't want names posting on here for Legal reasons. [namely, admin could be sued]. Once everything is in the open, then no problem. At the moment it's all rumour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ste B Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 How can the BBC boards post allsorts of rumours and this site cannot do a thing? The BBC topic board is quite blatent; have a read. 381665[/snapback] Because the BBC Boards are not moderated. This is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speeeeeeedie Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Ste, does that still mean though that they can get into trouble? What if the rumour is true? What would happen then. Example: If someone on this site reported that politician X had a fling with politician Y. would the site be in trouble, even if it came out shortly thereafter that it was true? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philipl Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 The site is not a company with liability limited by law. It is a group of individuals whose assets and livelihood are at risk if somebody with deep pockets and a litigous nature fancies his/her day in court. Quite simply, true or untrue, on other boards or not, it is very unfair on the team who voluntarily run this site to even remotely put them at risk. My guess is that the 606 Board run by the BBC will get shut down after this. The posters have been clever with their thread titles (for the most part) and the one or two people the BBC use to moderate those threads cannot cope with a forum which is exploding in size to such an extent that the BBC's servers cannot cope, let alone the moderators. I was amazed at the volume of traffic on just the Blackburn Rovers sub-heading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grizfoot Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Have I missed something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 QUOTE(ABBEY @ Feb 2 2006, 21:48 ) hes ronoldos shemale bitch Abbey.....that's two Shemale references in two different threads in one day... Mods, is that sometype of mark? EDIT: I stand corrected.... three references if you count Tranny... Not that I'm fixated or anything... Abs, me friend, seek counsel 381604[/snapback] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey_big_nose Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Well if the rumours are true I hope he gets a lot of support. A lot of people are going to make it difficult for him. I wonder how the British public will come out of this, compasionate or a bunch of bigots? Should be interesting if, as I said, it is true. As for NOTW, they have a got a lot of balls, but they could suffer a huge backlash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
den Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Come on guys - Mark Lawrenson. Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 does he like shemales?? oops done it again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
broadsword Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Come on guys - Mark Lawrenson. Please. 381697[/snapback] Wouldn't touch him with mine! You have him Den! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AxesFirstTouch Posted February 3, 2006 Share Posted February 3, 2006 Come on guys - Mark Lawrenson. Please. 381697[/snapback] You want lawro to come on guys? Sick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 dont ask just klick lol im 50% shock horror Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthAussieRover Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Have I missed something 381683[/snapback] Yup something to do with a well known brand of soup. If the claims about the well known brand of soup prove correct he'll be a celebrity cause. At that stage the PC brigade will be out in force defending the well known brand of soup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Dart Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Yup something to do with a.... It's the tabloid scum. AGAIN. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihateburnley Posted February 5, 2006 Author Share Posted February 5, 2006 dont ask just klick lol im 50% shock horror 381751[/snapback] I'm 13%. Far too high in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 how do you think i felt 50%!!!!!!! well unless she was a he at club trop last night i must be down to 20% again lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave329 Posted February 5, 2006 Share Posted February 5, 2006 im 10% still to high for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blue phil Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 As for NOTW, they have a got a lot of balls, but they could suffer a huge backlash. 381696[/snapback] A lot of balls and a huge backlash .......!! Not just the NOTW by the sounds of it.......oooohh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
American Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 30%. Abbey, I'm thinking leather trousers and piercings might have something to do with your score!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers Air Force Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 (edited) 16% for me... not to bad, calling it partially in touch with my femanine side! Edited February 7, 2006 by Rovers Air Force Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ABBEY Posted February 8, 2006 Share Posted February 8, 2006 30%. Abbey, I'm thinking leather trousers and piercings might have something to do with your score!! 382361[/snapback] dont forget the lube think that had a bearing as well.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts