AggyBlue Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 http://www.rovers.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/blackburn-rovers-marvin-emnes-swansea-city-3545168.aspx#Vvm6cVf4KUfwHFlO.99 Waste of a loan place IMO
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
rigger Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, AggyBlue said: http://www.rovers.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/blackburn-rovers-marvin-emnes-swansea-city-3545168.aspx#Vvm6cVf4KUfwHFlO.99 Waste of a loan place IMO I think it's only a waste of a loan place ,if there was a choice between Emnes and someone else, and there doesn't seem to be.
Oldgregg86 Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 Glad he's back. Is up there with the best of a bad bunch. Always contributed something and will put effort in. That's what you need in a relegation battle. Would rather see more inadequate positions on the field filled but still..Welcome back Marvin
47er Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 The thing is we really need a better midfield but since we need 3 goals to get any points.......
Mercer Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 Underwhelmed. IMV, always flatters to deceive.
JAL Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 1 hour ago, AggyBlue said: http://www.rovers.co.uk/news/article/2016-17/blackburn-rovers-marvin-emnes-swansea-city-3545168.aspx#Vvm6cVf4KUfwHFlO.99 Waste of a loan place IMO Absolutely ! Three solitary goals from twenty games far from impressive should have gone back to Holland.
A cup of beans Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 2 hours ago, rigger said: I think it's only a waste of a loan place ,if there was a choice between Emnes and someone else, and there doesn't seem to be. I'm sure someone posted that we were : "paying an extremely low contribution to his wages" (probably from a Coyle interview). Would explain the transfer from all sides.
joey_big_nose Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 To be honest I think he is as good as we are going to do. We absolutely desperately need some competent and fit centre mids and centre backs. And wingers. And a right back. And a keeper. Apart from that we are good.
Hasta Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 Started well but became disappointing towards the end of his spell. Like Joey, I'd rather have a replacement in any other place than up front.
davulsukur Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 It’s good to see Emnes return to reinforce what is arguably our strongest area on the park. Forget the glaring deficiencies between the sticks, in the back 4 and the centre of midfield – all out attack is where it is at. All credit to Coyle, the bloke is a genius. Formation against Leeds ---------------------------------------Traffic Cone Lowey/ Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone --------------------Lowey/ Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone -------Joao--------------Gallagher----------Graham----------Emnes The blokes onto a winner
roverandout Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, davulsukur said: It’s good to see Emnes return to reinforce what is arguably our strongest area on the park. Forget the glaring deficiencies between the sticks, in the back 4 and the centre of midfield – all out attack is where it is at. All credit to Coyle, the bloke is a genius. Formation against Leeds ---------------------------------------Traffic Cone Lowey/ Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone --------------------Lowey/ Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone -------Joao--------------Gallagher----------Graham----------Emnes The blokes onto a winner HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT!!....a traffic cone has some use!
RevidgeBlue Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 Just now, davulsukur said: It’s good to see Emnes return to reinforce what is arguably our strongest area on the park. Forget the glaring deficiencies between the sticks, in the back 4 and the centre of midfield – all out attack is where it is at. All credit to Coyle, the bloke is a genius. Formation against Leeds ---------------------------------------Traffic Cone Lowey/ Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone --------------------Lowey/ Traffic Cone-- Traffic Cone -------Joao--------------Gallagher----------Graham----------Emnes The blokes onto a winner Laughed at that. Substitute two more traffic cones for Lowey and that's not a bad line up. As I said in the other thread I'm pleased to have Emnes back. On the assumption Stokes will be leaving or won't be featuring I don't think 4 strikers is completely unreasonable. Not denying we are weak elsewhere though.
JAL Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 7 minutes ago, roverandout said: HOW DARE YOU SAY THAT!!....a traffic cone has some use! You can play a one - two with a traffic cone !
JAL Posted January 31, 2017 Posted January 31, 2017 5 hours ago, Mercerman said: Underwhelmed. IMV, always flatters to deceive. Coyle's/Senior weakening the team. No quality keeper lined up !
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.