Jump to content

BRFCS

BY THE FANS, FOR THE FANS
SINCE 1996
Proudly partnered with TheTerraceStore.com

The Ryan Nyambe Appreciation Thread


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, chaddyrovers said:

If you watch the game you would know and stop asking question. 

the fact of it is you dislike him cos of his agent and nothing else. why you dislike his agent I have no idea but in a number of posts I have asked you to explain why you dislike his agent and so far nothing and always will be

200% agree Pedro. 

Chaddy Nyambe runs forward like a tank and then delivers a ball like a tank awkward and not that accurate once the distance goes beyond 25 yards. If he can play a 30 yard ball along the floor spinning infield onto a running Rovers player then I'll hold my hands up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tom said:

Put a great cross in for Graham who should have scored but headed over, another solid performance from the lad.

Was the cross straight or swerving and over what distance did he make it easier for Graham to miss or did Graham make hard work to contact the ball ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, rigger said:

Nyambe is good enough for our level, If he was any better he wouldn't be at the Rovers.

As an older Rovers supporter I want Rovers to be of a far higher standard than Nyambe is capable of and the empty seats will back me up.

What's Nyambe doing stood in that space for the free kick then ducking out the way of the free kick ?

Please tell blueboy?

Edited by JAL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AshleyClifford said:

While a man in the post may have prevented the shot, it would have played everybody onside. 

Charlie Mulgrew, actually seems to turn to watch the ball go by. Not sure why he did not move. 

You could also say a man on the post would have taken away the shot option. If it plays everyone onside so what? If the cross is played to the forwards, who would be static in the six yard box, I would expect the keeper to deal with it, or more likely a foul to be given to the keeper for the slightest of contact. You have to play the odds.

Edited by rigger
grammer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, rigger said:

You could also say a man on the post would have taken away the shot option. If it plays everyone onside so what? If the cross is played to the forwards, who would be static in the six yard box, I would expect the keeper to deal with it, or more likely a foul to be given to the keeper for the slightest of contact. You have to play the odds.

We did.

More goals are scored by balls into the box (especially with their height and quality of Abraham etc) than from direct free kicks.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, rigger said:

You could also say a man on the post would have taken away the shot option. If it plays everyone onside so what? If the cross is played to the forwards, who would be static in the six yard box, I would expect the keeper to deal with it, or more likely a foul to be given to the keeper for the slightest of contact. You have to play the odds.

Put a player on the line and the opposition will just stick everyone in front of the keeper. It would be suicide. There's a reason no-one does it. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, blueboy3333 said:

Put a player on the line and the opposition will just stick everyone in front of the keeper. It would be suicide. There's a reason no-one does it. 

You are not a good keeper if you cannot deal with a ball lobbed into your box when you are faced with static attackers and you have the  advantage of extra reach with your hands. I cannot see it being anymore suicidal than giving a player a free punt at goal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rigger said:

You are not a good keeper if you cannot deal with a ball lobbed into your box when you are faced with static attackers and you have the  advantage of extra reach with your hands. I cannot see it being anymore suicidal than giving a player a free punt at goal. 

True.  But the ball does not need to be lobbed in. Players could and would make earlier runs. Dacks disallowed header in the first half would have been in no doubt had villa had a man on the post. Although I must admit I’m not sure if this was a direct free kick or if the free kick is too wide to shoot. 9/10 free kicks go high and wide, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.