Venky’s (& Suhail) Out Protest Ideas

[chaddyrovers]

48 minutes ago, roverstdt said:

The old president Aulas had taken the club as far as he could financially and left the club in a good position. New stadium, new arena for shows, and little by little Textor sold the are an off and diverted funds to Botafogo. He was also trigger happy on managers building up huge pay packages to release them on contracts he invested in terrible players bar our striker and Ferri. A lot coming from Botafogo like Jefferson, andreylson, Ferri. Got rid of good people like Juninho, and Cacapa there is a reason why we are protesting against him. don’t forget his other club RWMD Change the logo without telling anyone and the name of the clubs got the club relegated from miss management. They have never recovered 

Thanks for the reply

[Boz]

The date today is the 4th July 2025. Rovers announced on the 22nd May 2025 that Waggott would be leaving.

He is still appearing as a director on Companies House. The company have 14 days to inform CH of changes to company's directors or their personal details, including resignations/terminations. 

What can be taken from this?

1) Waggott was still a director of Rovers at the 20th June 2025.

or 2) whoever runs Rovers (The Board of Directors) have disregard/disdain/arrogance of the potential impact of failing to inform CH. This might lead to; financial penalties; criminal offence; disqualification of directors; company dissolution; criminal prosecution. 

I would be worried if I was one of the remaining three directors; Rob Coar, Reddy Gandhi Babu (who?), Sreenivasa Rao Mandava (family member?), continuing to act as director. They're culpable leaving themselves open to actions, or negligent.

Especially so when it's abundantly clear that they are knowingly taking instructions from a shadow director, Mr Suhail Pasha. 

[...]

Where's this new kit then. Its 4/7 isn't it.

[wilsdenrover]

7 minutes ago, Boz said:

The date today is the 4th July 2025. Rovers announced on the 22nd May 2025 that Waggott would be leaving.

He is still appearing as a director on Companies House. The company have 14 days to inform CH of changes to company's directors or their personal details, including resignations/terminations. 

What can be taken from this?

1) Waggott was still a director of Rovers at the 20th June 2025.

or 2) whoever runs Rovers (The Board of Directors) have disregard/disdain/arrogance of the potential impact of failing to inform CH. This might lead to; financial penalties; criminal offence; disqualification of directors; company dissolution; criminal prosecution. 

I would be worried if I was one of the remaining three directors; Rob Coar, Reddy Gandhi Babu (who?), Sreenivasa Rao Mandava (family member?), continuing to act as director. They're culpable leaving themselves open to actions, or negligent.

Especially so when it's abundantly clear that they are knowingly taking instructions from a shadow director, Mr Suhail Pasha. 

They probably just forgot to press submit.

[MarkBRFC]

39 minutes ago, ... said:

Where's this new kit then. Its 4/7 isn't it.

4pm.

[DeeCee]

5 hours ago, Boz said:

The date today is the 4th July 2025. Rovers announced on the 22nd May 2025 that Waggott would be leaving.

He is still appearing as a director on Companies House. The company have 14 days to inform CH of changes to company's directors or their personal details, including resignations/terminations. 

What can be taken from this?

1) Waggott was still a director of Rovers at the 20th June 2025.

or 2) whoever runs Rovers (The Board of Directors) have disregard/disdain/arrogance of the potential impact of failing to inform CH. This might lead to; financial penalties; criminal offence; disqualification of directors; company dissolution; criminal prosecution. 

I would be worried if I was one of the remaining three directors; Rob Coar, Reddy Gandhi Babu (who?), Sreenivasa Rao Mandava (family member?), continuing to act as director. They're culpable leaving themselves open to actions, or negligent.

Especially so when it's abundantly clear that they are knowingly taking instructions from a shadow director, Mr Suhail Pasha. 

Perhaps his contract ran till end of June as well?

In which case they are still in time.

I agree with you though, I was just playing Pashas Advocate.

[chaddyrovers]

5 hours ago, Boz said:

The date today is the 4th July 2025. Rovers announced on the 22nd May 2025 that Waggott would be leaving.

He is still appearing as a director on Companies House. The company have 14 days to inform CH of changes to company's directors or their personal details, including resignations/terminations. 

What can be taken from this?

1) Waggott was still a director of Rovers at the 20th June 2025.

or 2) whoever runs Rovers (The Board of Directors) have disregard/disdain/arrogance of the potential impact of failing to inform CH. This might lead to; financial penalties; criminal offence; disqualification of directors; company dissolution; criminal prosecution. 

I would be worried if I was one of the remaining three directors; Rob Coar, Reddy Gandhi Babu (who?), Sreenivasa Rao Mandava (family member?), continuing to act as director. They're culpable leaving themselves open to actions, or negligent.

Especially so when it's abundantly clear that they are knowingly taking instructions from a shadow director, Mr Suhail Pasha. 

They will just say that Robert Coar is acting CEO until one is an appoint?

[wilsdenrover]

2 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

They will just say that Robert Coar is acting CEO until one is an appoint?

The issue isn’t who is covering the job ‘til an appointment is made.

The issue is not updating Companies House that Waggott has left. 

[barry_]

we need to keep up the pressure at games against gestede and suhil. 

Not easy, i know but i hate them. 

[rigger]

9 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

The issue isn’t who is covering the job ‘til an appointment is made.

The issue is not updating Companies House that Waggott has left. 

They will probably say: It was in the CEO's remit to inform Companies house. 

[...]

10 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

The issue isn’t who is covering the job ‘til an appointment is made.

The issue is not updating Companies House that Waggott has left. 

Such a basic requirement it's laughable 

[rigger]

20 minutes ago, ... said:

Such a basic requirement it's laughable 

It's almost as if no-one at the club knows how to run a company. Oh wait a minute !

[RoverDom]

I assume his contract wasn't terminated effective immediately and he is on some form of notice period / gardening leave so whilst not actively part of the club is still technically a director?

[RoversClitheroe]

6 minutes ago, RoverDom said:

I assume his contract wasn't terminated effective immediately and he is on some form of notice period / gardening leave so whilst not actively part of the club is still technically a director?

Not sure if that's allowed?

[rigger]

6 minutes ago, RoverDom said:

I assume his contract wasn't terminated effective immediately and he is on some form of notice period / gardening leave so whilst not actively part of the club is still technically a director?

 

6 minutes ago, RoverDom said:

I assume his contract wasn't terminated effective immediately and he is on some form of notice period / gardening leave so whilst not actively part of the club is still technically a director?

It is not so much the technicalities, more are the club aware that they have to inform Companies House, and whose job is it to do so ?

[chaddyrovers]

11 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

The issue isn’t who is covering the job ‘til an appointment is made.

The issue is not updating Companies House that Waggott has left. 

Can I ask how long does it take Company houses to update their online info? 

[Tomphil2]

Waggot said if he was to leave there was a period of notice to be given from either side so he's probably still serving that and maybe still doing some duties.

They'll change the companies house when they've found the correct stooge to place in front of themselves.

[AndyB]

3 hours ago, rigger said:

They will probably say: It was in the CEO's remit to inform Companies house. 

It's the Company Secretary's job to liase with Companies House.

 

[wilsdenrover]

3 hours ago, RoverDom said:

I assume his contract wasn't terminated effective immediately and he is on some form of notice period / gardening leave so whilst not actively part of the club is still technically a director?

They managed to take him off the club website staff list pdq 

[chaddyrovers]

5 hours ago, wilsdenrover said:

They managed to take him off the club website staff list pdq 

how long does it take companies house to update their website?

[RoverDom]

2 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

how long does it take companies house to update their website?

Online submissions - fairly instant a day or so to process

Paper forms posted in - a week or more. 

The last couple of terminations were done electronically.

Silvestre was terminated on 4th April but companies house not updated till 8th May

[chaddyrovers]

12 hours ago, RoverDom said:

Online submissions - fairly instant a day or so to process

Paper forms posted in - a week or more. 

The last couple of terminations were done electronically.

Silvestre was terminated on 4th April but companies house not updated till 8th May

Thanks for the reply Dom 

[paullarrygher]

Waggott resigned as a director from the Community Trust on 18 June. Still on the board at Rovers.

[RevidgeBlue]

You'd think they'd be quite keen to comply with all technicalities at the moment given that not doing things by the book has already attracted the attention of the Authorities over in India.

[RoversClitheroe]

5 hours ago, RevidgeBlue said:

You'd think they'd be quite keen to comply with all technicalities at the moment given that not doing things by the book has already attracted the attention of the Authorities over in India.

Im pretty sure you can report them to company's house.