Fans Forum/Roverstore/Commercial Chat

[alex l]

Any deals they do have to be careful not to undercut the cost per game of ST holders, therefore when it's a discount across multiple games the savings aren't dramatic. All goes back to the issue of ST prices. 

[Mike E]

1 hour ago, alex l said:

Any deals they do have to be careful not to undercut the cost per game of ST holders, therefore when it's a discount across multiple games the savings aren't dramatic. All goes back to the issue of ST prices. 

A great way to stop undercutting STHs is to not charge THEM quite so fucking much either. Then maybe we’d get more on the ground.

Should be £300 anywhere in the ground, with ‘Twenty’s Plenty’ for per-game pricing.

[alex l]

I don't disagree that ST pricing is too high but I'm not convinced £300 is the mark to really move the needle on attendance. If it was, and I'm happy to be corrected if my recollection is wrong, the Riverside would be much fuller as that was the initial price. Make it £300 all around and we have an empty Riverside and possibly much lower revenue. 

[Mattyblue]

There’s no point of a four game bundle if it’s no cheaper pro rata than what you’d expect a match ticket to be anyway (I.e works out at £27 to £30 a game in the JW) as you only need to miss one for it to be terrible value.

Also logically if you are somebody that doesn’t buy a ST in the first place then by default you don’t want to commit to multiple games in a row.

Waste of time from a regime that is cynically using crap deals that will get no take up in order to go ‘see, told you so’ in FF meetings.

[KidderStreetNoise]

1 hour ago, Mattyblue said:

There’s no point of a four game bundle if it’s no cheaper pro rata than what you’d expect a match ticket to be anyway (I.e works out at £27 to £30 a game in the JW) as you only need to miss one for it to be terrible value.

Also logically if you are somebody that doesn’t buy a ST in the first place then by default you don’t want to commit to multiple games in a row.

Waste of time from a regime that is cynically using crap deals that will get no take up in order to go ‘see, told you so’ in FF meetings.

If you use the bring a friend for a tenner for Charlton, I bet buying individual tickets for each game won't be far off the cost of the bundle

[MarkBRFC]

33 minutes ago, KidderStreetNoise said:

If you use the bring a friend for a tenner for Charlton, I bet buying individual tickets for each game won't be far off the cost of the bundle

Always remember that famous bundle in 21/22, £100 for the last 5 home games, but as they did a couple of individual offers on a couple of them it worked out at £90 if you bought them all separately. 

Not a clue that lot down there.

[Upside Down]

Just now, MarkBRFC said:

Always remember that famous bundle in 21/22, £100 for the last 5 home games, but as they did a couple of individual offers on a couple of them it worked out at £90 if you bought them all separately. 

Not a clue that lot down there.

Dunning Kruger effect. They all think they are much smarter than everyone else when in reality they are as thick as mince.

They're that inept that they're now making Steve Waggot look competent.

[wilsdenrover]

17 hours ago, Mattyblue said:

There’s no point of a four game bundle if it’s no cheaper pro rata than what you’d expect a match ticket to be anyway (I.e works out at £27 to £30 a game in the JW) as you only need to miss one for it to be terrible value.

Also logically if you are somebody that doesn’t buy a ST in the first place then by default you don’t want to commit to multiple games in a row.

Waste of time from a regime that is cynically using crap deals that will get no take up in order to go ‘see, told you so’ in FF meetings.

How about four matches where each one you attend gets progressively cheaper?

ie. first £25, second £20 third £15 fourth £10.

Go to them all and you’ve averaged out at £17.50. 

Perhaps even make it any four matches rather than them having to be consecutive.

 

 

Edited 46 minutes ago by wilsdenrover