Valérien Ismaël: Blackburn Rovers Head Coach

[RevidgeBlue]

8 hours ago, arbitro said:

I have been told that the first team didn't train until 15.30 yesterday which is almost unheard of particularly the day before a game.

The reason I am told is because Ismael flew to France immediately after the game at Charlton and didn't return until yesterday afternoon. This was to celebrate his 50th birthday.

If it is true I find it extremely surprising that he is allowed to change the routine so markedly so he can have a birthday bash.

Maybe not quite to the same extent but that has echoes of Rooney at Plymouth allegedly skipping training sessions so he could fulfill media engagements with Colleen.

[Bronzed A Donis]

4 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

I would imagine its only Radio Lancs pre match there now until the issue get sort with the LT. 

This issue with LT and Elliott need sorting ASAP.

The club has the issue. Elliott doesn't need to resolve anything that would undermine his journalistic integrity.

[chaddyrovers]

3 minutes ago, Bronzed A Donis said:

The club has the issue. Elliott doesn't need to resolve anything that would undermine his journalistic integrity.

Its needed resolving ASAP 

[RevidgeBlue]

5 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Its needed resolving ASAP 

So from the above comment I take it you think the Club aren't at fault?

[chaddyrovers]

29 minutes ago, RevidgeBlue said:

So from the above comment I take it you think the Club aren't at fault?

Like I said on Saturday, I still don't know what the LT or Elliott Jackson have done wrong for Rovers to ban them, still the none the wiser now what Rovers are so angry about. 

But this issue need resolving now and get Jackson and LT back covering games. 

[arbitro]

1 hour ago, Tricky said:

imagine the shame… a bloke daring to celebrate his 50th birthday and still bothering to put a training session on afterwards. Truly the darkest day in professional sport...

 

Whilst disrupting the preparation for a bit game by dismantling a process that has been used for years, not just by Rovers. There was also inconvenience to the Brockhall staff who had to stay behind to accommodate Ismaels vanity.

Next week is an international break - surely be would have been better off celebrating then when there are no games to prepare for.

If you think it is acceptable that is your right - I can tell you that a fair number of staff thought it was selfish.

[lraC]

3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Like I said on Saturday, I still don't know what the LT or Elliott Jackson have done wrong for Rovers to ban them, still the none the wiser now what Rovers are so angry about. 

But this issue need resolving now and get Jackson and LT back covering games. 

Jackson is still covering Rovers, he is just banned from Ewood and has no access to the players or manager. They tried to get clubs from banning him from away games too. So far Charlton refused to do so and the club aren’t happy about that either, making some accusations about his club conduct on that too.

It seems the club aren’t happy with him reporting certain things and for speaking to players without the clubs permission. There is also accusations being made about him leaking team news.

There is an article online, with the LT refuting most of this, so effectively accusing the club of lying.

Worth having a look, as it does make interesting reading and in my view backs up the accusations of bullying going on at the club. 

[lraC]

Worth having a read of this Chaddy, if you don’t know what’s been happening.

 

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/25503720.lancashire-telegraph-clarifies-claims-blackburn-rovers/

[RevidgeBlue]

4 minutes ago, lraC said:

Jackson is still covering Rovers, he is just banned from Ewood and has no access to the players or manager. They tried to get clubs from banning him from away games too. So far Charlton refused to do so and the club aren’t happy about that either, making some accusations about his club conduct on that too.

It seems the club aren’t happy with him reporting certain things and for speaking to players without the clubs permission. There is also accusations being made about him leaking team news.

There is an article online, with the LT refuting most of this, so effectively accusing the club of lying.

Worth having a look, as it does make interesting reading and in my view backs up the accusations of bullying going on at the club. 

I wouldnt have wasted my time explaining the above, Chaddy's always first on the ball with any Rovers related news but if something occurs which seems to paint the Club in a bad light beyond reasonable doubt he pleads ignorance and claims to be unaware as to what has gone on.

[chaddyrovers]

31 minutes ago, lraC said:

Jackson is still covering Rovers, he is just banned from Ewood and has no access to the players or manager. They tried to get clubs from banning him from away games too. So far Charlton refused to do so and the club aren’t happy about that either, making some accusations about his club conduct on that too.

Yes already know that

31 minutes ago, lraC said:

It seems the club aren’t happy with him reporting certain things and for speaking to players without the clubs permission. There is also accusations being made about him leaking team news.

ok

31 minutes ago, lraC said:

There is an article online, with the LT refuting most of this, so effectively accusing the club of lying.

Worth having a look, as it does make interesting reading and in my view backs up the accusations of bullying going on at the club. 

 

27 minutes ago, lraC said:

Worth having a read of this Chaddy, if you don’t know what’s been happening.

 

https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/news/25503720.lancashire-telegraph-clarifies-claims-blackburn-rovers/

I read all the statements thanks irac last night than to Elliott tweeted for the Rovers but we need to get an agreement in place that allow the LT properly and be allow in for home games, press conferences, etc 

Edited 4 hours ago by chaddyrovers

[lraC]

3 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

Yes already know that

ok

 

I read all the statements thanks irac last night than to Elliott tweeted for the Rovers but we need to get an agreement in place that allow the LT properly and be allow in for home games, press conferences, etc 

Oh sorry, I thought you had just posted that you didn’t know what Elliott and the LT had done, for the club to ban them, but seems like you did actually know then. 

[Torgeir]

9 hours ago, arbitro said:

You are missing the point.

Tempest in a teacup mate.

[chaddyrovers]

1 minute ago, lraC said:

Oh sorry, I thought you had just posted that you didn’t know what Elliott and the LT had done, for the club to ban them, but seems like you did actually know then. 

but we don't know what these certain things are. 

[lraC]

Just now, chaddyrovers said:

but we don't know what these certain things are. 

Well I do, as I read that link I just posted, which explains it.

[Waggy76]

1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said:

Its needed resolving ASAP 

No it doesn't, he needs to run as long as it takes to get these shysters noteriety in the public eye, big time! 

[lraC]

10 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said:

but we don't know what these certain things are. 

Well I do, as I read that link I just posted, which explains it.

[lraC]

All the above have been denied by Elliott and the LT.

[Tricky]

1 hour ago, arbitro said:

Whilst disrupting the preparation for a bit game by dismantling a process that has been used for years, not just by Rovers. There was also inconvenience to the Brockhall staff who had to stay behind to accommodate Ismaels vanity.

Next week is an international break - surely be would have been better off celebrating then when there are no games to prepare for.

If you think it is acceptable that is your right - I can tell you that a fair number of staff thought it was selfish.

its not that deep and quite pathetic some fans cant accept it

[GHD]

16 minutes ago, Tricky said:

its not that deep and quite pathetic some fans cant accept it

I think you’re probably on your own on that one

[London blue]

25 minutes ago, Tricky said:

its not that deep and quite pathetic some fans cant accept it

It simply is an issue if - as suggested - staff are unhappy with it.

It's not that deep to you.

[arbitro]

30 minutes ago, Tricky said:

its not that deep and quite pathetic some fans cant accept it

If you think it's acceptable then good for you.

[RevidgeBlue]

3 minutes ago, arbitro said:

If you think it's acceptable then good for you.

If they normally train later for an evening kick off it's not a problem.

If they dont I think it's out of order.

His birthday was on Sunday. Can't see what was stopping him getting back in time for training on Monday as usual - if all else failed he earns more than enough to have hired a private jet.

Of course if we win tonight it'll be completely forgotten about, if not it's another stick to beat him with.

[rigger]

If we lose tonight should the crowd sing happy birthday to VI ?

[lraC]

2 hours ago, chaddyrovers said:

but we don't know what these certain things are. 

I do, as I’ve read both the article on Rovers website and the LT article. If you don’t and assuming you want to know, just log on.

[StHelensRover]

On 29/09/2025 at 14:22, rog of the rovers said:

Through First 18 League Games

Kean, Black, Berg, Appleton - All didn't reach 18 Championship League Games as Rovers boss in the Venkys era

Bowyer

P18 W6 D6 L6 F25 A25 Pts 24 GD 0

Lambert

P18 W6 D5 L7 F18 A17 Pts 23 GD +1

Coyle

P18 W5 D4 L9 F20 A27 Pts 19 GD -7

Mowbray* (* At Championship level)

P18 W6 D9 L3 F20 A18 Pts 27 GD +2

Tomasson

P18 W11 D0 L7 F23 A18 Pts 33 GD +5

Eustace** (** Does not include the Stoke City game - arguments made for and against its conclusion, but most credit the victory to Damien Johnson/David Lowe - despite Eustace already being appointed as manager)

P18 W4 D9 L5 F21 A22 Pts 21 GD -1

Ismael

P18 W6 D3 L9 F19 A22 Pts 21 GD -3

 

In a different era that feels a lifetime ago and just for fun

Souness*** (*** In Division One at the end of 1999/2000 and the start of the 2000/01 season)

P18 W6 D7 L5 F27 A20 Pts 25 GD +7

Interesting read, more damning for VI in that he was appointed to a team that was in the playoffs and that he managed to derail it in a quite unbelievable fashion, even by our own standards. That run of defeats to Derby, Stoke and Cardiff when he first came in who I think were 3 of the bottom 4 at time will live long in the memory. 

 

Edited 1 hour ago by StHelensRover