Popular Post JHRover Posted 17 hours ago Popular Post Posted 17 hours ago I have some sympathy for him in terms of players missing and disgraceful regime he's (chosen) to work for but 1 win in 11 and counting is sacking territory for any manager at any club, regardless of circumstances. Here though? Not a hint. Distract the masses with transfer gossip instead. 17 Quote
Moderation Lead K-Hod Posted 17 hours ago Moderation Lead Posted 17 hours ago Whilst Pasha and Rudy have made us sell all our best players to cut costs, he’s still absolutely hopeless. At any other club, he’d be under scrutiny for such a poor run, but not here at Easy Street Ewood. 6 Quote
Tomphil2 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago I think we've seen enough now to be clear we need a change of approach and tactics it just isn't working aside from the odd win that comes out of the blue. Yes we know what he's up against but his tactics are all wrong for a club and team in our situation. He has the team running on empty by half time every game and the goal attempts/corners/set piece/chances created column rarely ever has more than one or two entries in it. 2 Quote
G Somerset Rover Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) He can’t win football matches which is fairly important for a manager. Well, at any normal club it is. As an aside, we’ve scored two goals in the last 525 minutes of football. Jesus wept. Edited 15 hours ago by G Somerset Rover 7 Quote
Waggy76 Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago If his hands are being tied , he should walk like the 2 previous managers . We will see in early February! 2 Quote
Upside Down Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago He's got himself a three year deal. The job's his for that time unless he decides he wants out. All he needs to do is reference Suhail and the owners by name in a press conference and it will all be over for him. The question is, will he take us down two divosions or just one? 1 Quote
Lancaster Rover Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago Still no closer to knowing what our style of play or identity is. 12 months in and for large parts of most games we look as clueless as his first game against Norwich, where we contrived to make Shane Duffy look like beckenbaur. Quote
Waggy76 Posted 13 hours ago Posted 13 hours ago 25 minutes ago, Upside Down said: He's got himself a three year deal. The job's his for that time unless he decides he wants out. All he needs to do is reference Suhail and the owners by name in a press conference and it will all be over for him. The question is, will he take us down two divosions or just one? He is no good , he will take us down ! It is how he leaves ? , that is the question, for me ! Quote
MarkBRFC Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago He will absolutely take us down before his 3 year deal is up. I think he will get away with it this season by the skin of his teeth, next year though I can see us not being that much better off than Sheffield Wednesday. Quote
London blue Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago Odds on Ismael's contract being the next one that the club extends? Quote
Upside Down Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 1 minute ago, London blue said: Odds on Ismael's contract being the next one that the club extends? Odds on. Quote
Tim Southampton Rover Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago The question I keep having in my head is: IF we stay up - what has Val learned this season that he can apply next season? Is he brave enough to take a calculated risk? Does he have what it takes to bring out the best in the players? I think there is too much of an over reliance on 'trusting the data'. The trouble is, what data are you trusting and at what point does the data become untrustworthy? Our stats might look better playing a 5-3-2 than a 4-5-1 but at the moment the key stat that is being ignored is the lack of wins. I want Val to look at the overall picture and think "This is clearly not working, despite what the stats say, let's try something DIFFERENT". When I watched Macclesfield beat Palace, they had a plan. The part time players may not have thought winning was likely but they still believed in the manager and his plan and it worked. I appreciate V.I has a lot of injuries but I don't think we could have beaten Crystal Palace the other day if we played them. We don't seem to have a plan that the players believe in or can get the best out of them. I want Val to take on the challenge of having a weakened team and make the players feel 10x better. Instead, they look like they are scared to not let him down rather than try and take on the world. Quote
roversfan99 Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago To be fair, results were even worse playing 4231. Results in general under him have been shocking. Quote
roverblue Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I think the only way we see the back of the 5 man defensive and the team's appalling goal scoring record is if Ismael goes. Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 52 minutes ago Posted 52 minutes ago The 5 at the back worked pretty well when we had the players to play it. None of the centre backs looked good enough to play in just a 2. Maybe that isn’t the case now. We had Alebiosu and Hedges as pretty effective wing backs. It allowed us to play Ohashi and Gudjohnsen up front as a pair when neither of them had what it takes to play up front on their own. They looked to be forming a good partnership when Gudjohnsen got injured unfortunately. Alebiosu is missing at the moment, Hedges is probably out for the rest of the season. Gudjohnsen is out for a while yet. So the plan is in tatters. Without some signings we are just drifting downwards. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.