chaddyrovers Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 11 minutes ago, KentExile said: If I wasn't aware of how cheap Rovers are under the current regime, I would be convinced that they were paying you to spread propaganda Even if we agree for the sake of argument to discount Oxford & Portsmouth, look at the rest of the post. These are actual figures from the actual published (most recently available) accounts. If you still think Rovers do not pay wages below the Championship average, then you are truly a lost cause My point orignally was we didn't sign those 2 players cos we signed Taveras as our midfielder signing Yet our wages still above our turnover in 23/24 financial year(118%), hence why they want and need into increase income coming in from commercial and sponsor revenue. You are correct that we are lower end of wages and we have wage structure but we need to be careful cos we can't offer our key players the sort of increase of wages to get them to re-sign here tho we can't be reckless and offer them more than we can afford otherwise other players will demand much more. leading to problems. Our key players around 6 or 7 should be on a certain around 16k to 25k, then your next 6 or 7 players should be around 10k to 15k with rest below that but with incentives bonuses in all contracts based on appearances, goals and clean sheets. Quote
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
KentExile Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago (edited) 17 minutes ago, chaddyrovers said: Our key players around 6 or 7 should be on a certain around 16k to 25k, then your next 6 or 7 players should be around 10k to 15k with rest below that but with incentives bonuses in all contracts based on appearances, goals and clean sheets. I do agree with that, However those sort of figures would be around the Championship average, which we unfortunately no longer pay Edited 8 hours ago by KentExile 1 Quote
roversfan99 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago The only alternative to what we are doing isnt to be "wreckless." There is a middle ground. Similar to Suhail trying to defend our unwillingness to reinvest by saying that spending loads doesnt guarantee you anything. Its not a defence to give an extreme opposite scenario to justify quite how unwilling we are to offer competitive wages and/or justify quite how little we reinvest. 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 57 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: There is a middle ground. What does that look like? Do you agree with this? Is that similar to what I suggest to KentExile " Our key players around 6 or 7 should be on a certain around 16k to 25k, then your next 6 or 7 players should be around 10k to 15k with rest below that but with incentives bonuses in all contracts based on appearances, goals and clean sheets. " Quote
roversfan99 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said: What does that look like? Do you agree with this? Is that similar to what I suggest to KentExile " Our key players around 6 or 7 should be on a certain around 16k to 25k, then your next 6 or 7 players should be around 10k to 15k with rest below that but with incentives bonuses in all contracts based on appearances, goals and clean sheets. " I couldnt say the exact amount that we would need to pay. I just know that our inability to offer competitive contracts is decimating our squad of quality and sooner or later that leads to one thing and it isnt good. Quote
StHelensRover Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago I don't know why you're all humouring Chaddy by responding to his snide "you have all the answers" remarks when anyone who can read and doesn't live under a stone knows we pay well below the going rate for absolutely everything at our club, players, coaches and the rest. Even if you give him the facts and figures he will bury his head in the sand, the club can do no wrong in his eyes. He probably hasn't read the latest forum minutes yet. Quote
KentExile Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, chaddyrovers said: What does that look like? Do you agree with this? Is that similar to what I suggest to KentExile " Our key players around 6 or 7 should be on a certain around 16k to 25k, then your next 6 or 7 players should be around 10k to 15k with rest below that but with incentives bonuses in all contracts based on appearances, goals and clean sheets. " 8 minutes ago, roversfan99 said: I couldnt say the exact amount that we would need to pay. I just know that our inability to offer competitive contracts is decimating our squad of quality and sooner or later that leads to one thing and it isnt good. This is one of those rare occasions when you can both claim victory simultaneously 😉 If we were paying the sort of wages that Chaddy suggests there, then we would not have an inability to offer competitive contracts Edited 5 hours ago by KentExile Quote
simongarnerisgod Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago west brom one up on the welsh upstarts,terrible defending by the wannabe *****!!!! Quote
sharpysharps86 Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 9 minutes ago, simongarnerisgod said: west brom one up on the welsh upstarts,terrible defending by the wannabe *****!!!! Windass just pulled his hamstring as well. I can't see Parkinson seeing the season out with Wrexham. He's a top end of league one manager at best. 2 Quote
Bronzed A Donis Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago O brien equaliser. Running game. If only we hadn't deliberately sabotaged the deal. Quote
wilsdenrover Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 47 minutes ago, KentExile said: This is one of those rare occasions when you can both claim victory simultaneously 😉 If we were paying the sort of wages that Chaddy suggests there, then we would not have an inability to offer competitive contracts A Pyrrhic one? 1 Quote
chaddyrovers Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, roversfan99 said: I couldnt say the exact amount that we would need to pay. I just know that our inability to offer competitive contracts is decimating our squad of quality and sooner or later that leads to one thing and it isnt good. Fair enough. I'm happy to say what my wage structure would be. Quote
Tyrone Shoelaces Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Sounds like Baath is playing centrally in a back three. Not his game. Maybe that’s why Coventry have scored 4. Quote
Wing Wizard Windy Miller Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Baath subbed off after the fifth went in. Quote
sharpysharps86 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Batth and Sanderson starting in a defensive 3 that's conceded 5. Combine that with the 3 away at Stoke and looks like Eustace has a bit of defensive work to do. Where's that Agyemang that they signed from the MLS? Injured? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.