47er

Its unrealistic in the view of many. Your disposable income tells you whether its scandalous or not. Probably represents 4 hours work for some.

As others have said, if you want to maximise prices for a big away following like Preston, by all means do so but protect your own so as we get the biggest crowd possible to roar on the team. It can be done eg sell 3 tickets for any 3 home games which include this "blockbuster." Or have a membership/part season ticket scheme £ 15 per season allows you 30% off any 5 home games etc etc. Where there's a will, there's a way. Haven't heard from the Fans Forum for a while---isn't this their terrain? Have they got involved in this issue?

On a day of joy for all Rovers fans you prefer to divide us into "fans" and "real fans". (I suppose real fans are those with a different view to you?) Well done!

Might be the result?!

Yes, had to believe now. I knew people who followed Rovers one Saturday and Burnley the next. Some had season tickets for both.

No argument there Gav, my comments were directed at your list of rovers attendances!!

Probably because Jack wouldn't buy the likes of Zinadine Zidan? He had plans for the next season, Jack didn't agree.

Different times Gav. Attendances everywhere up since then. Poor stadiums, fan violence. Not seen as a family day out!

He's a Liverpool icon really, Best to leave him with them imo.

Personally the thought of a statue of Jack sharing space with one of Mowbray fills me with horror.

Not to contradict you at all but remember quite a few Rovers fans live in the south, helps particularly with mid-week games.

Glory Hunter!

I think anyone who stays in a managerial job for so long, with such dreadful results till now is truly a legend---like Dick Turpin!

I think the answer to that is obvious and stated so any times. In a nutshell its the quality of the football and the money wasted on players who shouldn't have been here. Add tactics, tinkering, subs etc and he's been the complete package. That's his share of the blame accounted for. Can't deny things have been much better this season.

We had impetus from that League 1 promotion but he dissipated it. Those next 2 seasons were diabolical. And if you don't agree---look at the attendances, fans have voted with their feet.

Yep! Can't disagree with any of that. Its a thin line we tread though and heavily dependent on Kaminski being fit I'd suggest.

No, not really. Just commenting on one of those triumphalist posts I can't stand. Always delighted when we win because I am a Rovers supporter from birth.

Imagine what we could achieve if we had a good manager is another way of looking at it. For example was it a wise decision to pay good money to Boro for Pears? I fear we might be about to find out. We always said on here that the young lads we have should have figured over the old uns he kept picking.

Can't he just run that down and go for nothing? Don't other clubs know that too? The answer is to give him a whopping pay rise in return for a clause in the new contract which allows him to go for a whopping fee with a % sell-on fee.

But aren't we in the same position with Brereton as Posh are with Dembele? And we are unlikely to be able to demand much either.

I do assume money is the issue and the club can't or won't offer the going rate. I've no proof of course before anyone asks.

Yet its written in there! Bonkers!

At last, its referred to as a bonus in the contract, its directly linked to us being relegated (twice!) but its not incentivising him for achieving relegation. OK---you have explained what it isn't for iyo, so I'm asking you what it is for?

I think the issue is rather that you can't seem to blame the club for anything.

Its referred to as a bonus in the contract isn't it? Or have I misremembered? I repeat, if it isn't what would you call it? Re the above, he sued the club for constructive dismissal and Venkys paid undisclosed compensation! You think he didn't get his "losses" back?!! Bloody stupid discussion this one!