Jump to content

davulsukur

Members
  • Posts

    14492
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by davulsukur

  1. Are all these Pasha out banners the work of the coalition? or just some guys doing their thing?
  2. Selles the guy that took Hull to the brink of relegation?
  3. Gone to Chelsea apparently, There was talk of Β£700k coming our way but no idea if it's confirmed.
  4. I bought last seasons black away kit for Thursday night football but I've not had the guts to wear it yet πŸ˜‚
  5. Some people on X, @glen9mullan included, getting damaged shirts. Not a good start.
  6. Assuming none of Trav, Tronstad, Brittain or Hyam leave, I'll bet none of our summer signings start the season opener.
  7. The owners & senior management at Rovers (Waggott included) have done a very good job of pushing the narrative that there are no alternatives out there for a change in ownership at Rovers, that we should be grateful even, of their continued ownership. They've got a good amount of the fanbase believing that we are maxed out in every respect, we push the boundaries as far as we can within the limits of the regulations. I've even had comments from Dingles on X along the lines of "WiThOuT VeNkY's YoU's CoLlApSe" and that "No one would ever buy us" The reality, as demonstrated across all the leagues in English football is that there are willing parties out there, ready to take over football clubs and do so with real, genuine ambition with ideas and plans in place to drive that ambition. The only reason it won't happen here is because of whatever bizarre reason Venky's have for refusing to let us go. We're going to be left behind sooner rather than later, and the longer they keep us in their death grip, the further we will fall.
  8. Oh nice one. cheers. I'll take a look and see what's on
  9. Some random X account reckoned that Weimann to Derby was all but done. Didn't bother adding it to here because it was just a random account that's probably trying to grab a summer 25 ITK badge but it wouldn't surprise me.
  10. I don't even know what this tournament is? πŸ˜‚ Also, it's on DAZN sports, which means I can't watch it anyway.
  11. Indeed. The whole point, as they've admitted to, is to relieve the financial burden off the owners. The fabled Brentford model is a total myth.
  12. Like De Neve, this guy looks like he has some attributes to work with but will need to work hard on the technical side of things to be at Championship level. Nothing wrong with that but that would make 2 signings that are unlikely to be up to speed until mid-way (or beyond) the season. I know this is the clubs plan (buy potential, get them up to speed, sell them and not reinvest the money) but it would shape up to be another season of nothing, as we'll just be developing players for the other clubs.
  13. I like the kit, just not as a 150th anniversary kit, in that respect, its pretty terrible.
  14. No surprise whatsoever and just further evidence that we will never go anywhere but down with this ownership. 2 of our best players are now likely to be sold for a fraction of their value and replaced with inferior quality. Get these scumbags out of our club.
  15. I really hope Andrews gets the Brentford job (he won't), because, well it would be a laugh
  16. 0 chance. They'll be off to League One most likely. Β£250k max per player
  17. I can't give you an answer on that. Whatever their reasons, it's not for the benefit of Blackburn Rovers FC.
  18. Someone has been pointing him in the right direction.
  19. https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/25234748.blackburn-rovers-hold-talks-resolve-star-players-futures/ Looks like we are finally waking up with regards to Travis and Tronstads contracts. The article however, certainly feels like its written to soften the blow of Travis departure. I suspect the club will try and cash in on him, whilst he still has some value to cover some the financial hole they have created.
  20. Batth turns 35 in a couple of months. Although I want him to stay, and his influence will be felt both on and off the pitch, I don't think the club should really be offering a 2 year deal. 1 year with an option would be better, if he'll agree to it. Difficult tbh, no reason he couldn't play for 2 more years, also his legs could go over night and we're landed with him for another season (or more)
  21. Sell him, make Β£1m profit, restore Pears as No.1, promote the recently new contracted Jack Barrett to No.2. Sorted (in Suhail's world)
  22. Yep, Jackson reckons we're basically planning for life without Batth and Weimann now. Talks not ended but seems highly unlikely for both now. https://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk/sport/25231529.blackburn-rovers-contract-latest-impasse-continues/
  23. What positions was it that RG said we were looking at? Thought RW and CM were in there, assuming RB was as well?
  24. Unless it's silly money, purely out of spite, I could see us just flat out rejecting any bids made by Derby whilst JE is there.
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...