roversfan99

Very much a case of trying to cobble together a side to minimise the obvious weaknesses in the squad. Toth Alebiosu Carter Wharton Pickering TGH Tronstad Miroshita Cantwell Hedges Gudjohnsen Tavares has looked sub par so give TGH a game. Pickering is IMO better than Ribeiro. Ohashi has not started the season like the refreshed goalscorer some predicted so stick Gudjohnsen straight in. And how we are going into games selecting Hedges still shows up recruitment. Bets on how long it will take one of the 2 centre backs to pull up. Cant see past a home win but hope they surprise me.

That twitter account is at best a very debatable source. A wannabee ITK. Said all sort of shit in the last couple of days in the window. Either way, its impossible to now come close to replacing Hyam. Anyone now a free agent is there for a reason. Dawson is 35, his form dropped off a cliff and Wolves didnt even register him post January (after 2 own goals in the same game at Everton) so will not have got any better and will be totally unfit. Oxford were happy to agree to rip up Moore's contract. Their fans agreed and didnt see him as Championship standard. We are so reliant now on Carter staying fit and performing well. He hasnt come close to either in the last 2 seasons.

Any others? Or did you mean "a game where he was amazing."

I think he has only been really good on one occasion. West Brom away. Has obvious physicality but hard to find a poorer finisher or a player lacking as much intelligence as shown by the amount of attacks breaking down when he fails to even try to time his run properly. I also think at times towards the end of last season in particular, he has appeared petulant rather than with a point to prove.

Not connected to Gueye. But I really dont like this idea of giving game time to a 17 year old purely for the purpose of trying to convince him to sign a new deal. Its likely a futile gesture anyway, I suspect the odd start and some minutes off the bench would sway him from taking a big offer from a big club should it come up. But if that is the primary objective, then whats best for the team becomes of secondary importance. Its not even as if hes signed a deal and we know we are developing our own player. He has always played off the striker in his rare minutes too.

It was hyperbolic but he is certainly nowhere near good enough for a Championship club. He came in with the advantage of replacing Gallagher who had stayed too long and become unpopular. It was assumed that we couldnt get worse, we managed it, but combined with his clearly infectious character, people werent and many still wont have it. The goals and assist thing is a good example of the above. He wasnt scoring goals so people used the goal and assist stat. So its including him missing open nets and the ball hitting his heel, or winning headers 30 yards out as the equivalent to a goal. Bringing him on late in theory can cause carnage but more often than not he just totally spoils any attacks standing offside or losing the ball. Starting games, our record was far worse last season when he started. I would have liked another striker but I would happily shift Gueye.

Gueye is a waste of space, always has been. Would be losing a really poor striker. We could have done with a third striker but we have like at CB missed our chance there to get a reasonable option. Dennis though, did people watch the same player as me? Rubbish.

There is nothing to suggest that either left specifically because of him.

What other partners has Hyam struggled with? He has been very good for most of his Rovers career. People have always credited others when he has done well and blamed him when he and others have struggled. Maybe a mixture of Carter playing poorly and him playing on the left didnt help. In his poor season, we were also really open as a team and struggling as a team. Or more they were both playing well with each other. Why does it have to be one playing well and carrying the other?

What has he done that makes you consider him to have been an excellent appointment?

He needs to go back to being sub keeper. Ismael (or maybe someone higher up) needs to drop any grudge to avoid us taking a huge risk with a kid as next in line.

I dont think it changes anything "dramatically." Anybody we do sign will take a long while to get fit and considering they are a free agent in September, there will be a reason for that. It would be a desperate signing following the untimely loss of a key player. Whoever if anyone we get still represents a huge downgrade on Hyam.

If its a deal we want then get it done imminently. That way he can get fit quicker.

It would be a desperate attempt to scramble around having seen the pound signs flash in front of our eyes on deadline day without replacing Hyam. Hes not played for a while, he would be totally unfit. But it would come under better than nothing. He obviously was a Premier League standard defender but not sure what level hes at now. He is experienced and would be a leader.

Would be an incredible bit of business if we managed to get someone even worse than Gueye.

He was excellent in that season under JDT. Deservedly won player of the season.

https://www.smallheathalliance.com/read.php?1,3868918 https://www.otib.co.uk/topic/224605-taylor-gardner-hickman-what-is-he-good-at/ Here are some opinions on TGH. There is certainly a theme. No one seems to think that he at the time was ready or going to really establish himself, described as bit of a "meh" player, doesnt grab games by the scruff of the neck or impose himself. . Equally, not many dont think he is at least decent. He seems to be popular for his work rate and versatility, but incapable of nailing down a position, especially in midfield. Has energy, ok technically, and the idea that he was the best of a bad bunch at set pieces which considering how bad our set pieces are, would actually be an improvement here. I have seen him play before and he has never stood out. Our midfield situation is a bit of a puzzle. Tronstad has been left isolated this season with Tavares next to him who I think most of us are unconvinced by. Baradji was the one they seemed to want to make a song and dance about but is injured so it means nothing. So I think there is a chance there for TGH to start v Watford and try and nail an uncertain position but its something hes failed to do at any of his previous clubs. I also wonder who would sit if Tronstad got injured. The others all seem similar types. Of course, midfield questions have obviously been blown out of the water by the centre back situation.

Agreed. I dont think you will be wrong sadly. I have always felt that Hyam was underrated. He has never been particularly popular but in 2 of 3 seasons, he has been very good. There has always been a narrative that when he plays well its because of his defensive partner and when we have struggled its down to him. Grossly unfair.

I wouldnt have wanted him and at this stage of his career, a huge downgrade on Hyam. Would be unfit, and is left footed so would leave us imbalanced. One of them though where players like that, would be really disappointed if it was mid transfer window and we signed him to replace such a key player. Now, when we are so limited just to players who havent had a pre season and havent been able to find a club, we are at the probably better than no one stage.

You always know its been a bad window when people are trawling through the shite without a club.

Not until at least January he wont.

No use for him in terminating his contract either way as he would have to wait until January.

But again, I suspect that sort of result will happen more than once. We dont have a squad at a level that isnt competitive. But we have lost the experience, the know how, the whole defence, the above average manager and didnt have the goal threat to begin with to swerve tight games in our favour.

This "ask us questions" is a crafty attempt at appearing to be open, engaging and transparent. And sadly, some of the more gullible will be taken in by it. Suhail has swerved it and the questions this way have to be heavily vetted. Gestede and Owen should be given a P45 at any self respecting club. Before even considering snake Suhail and obviously the owners. Take contracts. The question about our total inability to sort them full stop will be swerved. Individual circumstances will be put down to location, players downing tools, clubs offering uncompetitive wages, all sorts of shit excuses and no justification as to the overriding pattern. Ismael needs to be asked if he is happy. He will probably say yes but if he has a shred of ambition and credibility, he cant be. He didnt want this window.

Its not as if the players as a whole are miles off the standard and we will start getting battered every week. Narrow games will regularly go against us. The narrative after them like with the Birmingham game we "deserved" to win (apparently) might be a common one. We no longer have a solid defence capable of churning out clean sheets. We dont have the experience in the team with the know how to grind out results especially when not playing that well. We dont have the goal threat in the team to nick tight games. And we no longer have a good manager IMO capable of getting the team playing like Eustace did beyond the sum of its parts. The window is only 8 out of 10 purely from a perspective of cost cutting. Its not a cause of celebration to witness these "older" key players jettisoned. 27-29 is not old. You cant just strip out all of the experience in a squad and expect good things. The squad (and manager) are much weaker. The fans are always behind the players. But if you see merit in the project then you are going to be badly let down.