Backroom DE. Posted April 17, 2013 Backroom Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's giving me a 404 Not Found, don't tell me it's been pulled already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
This thread is brought to you by theterracestore.com Enter code `BRFCS` at checkout for an exclusive discount!
chaddyrovers Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's giving me a 404 Not Found, don't tell me it's been pulled already? http://www.brfcactiongroup.co.uk/ new link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurid Coat Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's giving me a 404 Not Found, don't tell me it's been pulled already? Just try again. A lot of people are accessing the site at the same time, which is probably the reason for the 404 message (I got the same a couple of times). It worked a minute ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J*B Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 If you can't see it, there's a very low quality version on my twitter: @realjoshboswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Rover Heels Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Seems like it's working for me D.E. Try again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Graham Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I would save equal contempt for our new Solicitors for attempting to come up with a flimsy defence which will no doubt end up costing us a shedload in legal fees. The best advice would have just been to pay up and minimise legal costs, not drag the matter out through various further hearings after which we'll no doubt have to end up paying both side's costs. . The High Court in NOT cheap. I spent 2 days in the London High Court Chancery Division last year year defending a case. The legal fees for our side were £115,000. Luckily we won the case (fantastic QC) and the other side paid all our costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Are those letters genuine? The "accounts people"?? No wonder Silk is allegedly working her notice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark1875 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Graham Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Wrong posting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I feel a 'so what' coming on, Mark. Not aimed at the action group but if those letters are true, and if Berg's contract stands up in court, Shaw should be gone should they not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiggy Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Those letters would suggest that Shaw is a goner...........along with whoever leaked the letters to BRAG! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rover_Shaun Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Is Ian Sylvester at the club? (possible fall guy?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backroom DE. Posted April 17, 2013 Backroom Share Posted April 17, 2013 Seen it now. Deary me, what a mess. The CC: Mr Shebby Singh, Mr Paul Agnew made me laugh a little though. Like it's just some standard office e-mail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Is Ian Sylvester at the club? (possible fall guy?) yeah still there as club secretary. presented a cheque to a charity before the game on the side of the pitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigman Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Why are the dates in different formats from letter 1 to letter 2. Don't look totally legit to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
martonrover Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Are these not emails rather than letters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Why are the dates in different formats from letter 1 to letter 2. Don't look totally legit to me. good point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 yeah still there as club secretary. presented a cheque to a charity before the game on the side of the pitch A cynic would point at the timing of that rare pitchside charitable appearance... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 A cynic would point at the timing of that rare pitchside charitable appearance... your choice pal Stuart. personally not bother tbh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glen9mullan Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Do you think we would be stupid enough , to put non legit emails on our website , when A) we are legal entity B. )we are cautious of legal implications ? We have of course got the full paper trail for where they came from . The source is rock solid and should anyone be wrongly implicated we would support any potential action.which may be brought against anyone The papers all have copies of these now , some have made reference to these emails already in the last week . They are 100% legit and won't be the last Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 the problem is, why was the contracts change??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rover_Shaun Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Do you think we would be stupid enough , to put non legit emails on our website , when A) we are legal entity B. )we are cautious of legal implications ? We have of course got the full paper trail for where they came from . The source is rock solid and should anyone be wrongly implicated we would support any potential action.which may be brought against anyone The papers all have copies of these now , some have made reference to these emails already in the last week . They are 100% legit and won't be the last Where there any replies and do you have them? Would add further context to the emails Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigman Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Apologies Glen, I didn't want to say they were not legit, just seems odd that from the same person, Mrs Desai has used 2 different formats of the date at the beginning of her email. I am sure they are legit, they would need to be. Keep up the sterling work you are all doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyke87 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I thought you were putting all this out at the end of the season? I'm not having a go because these worms need removing just odd timing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chaddyrovers Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Glen and BRFCAG, why have you put these letters into the public domain??? what are your motives and raesons for doing so??? thought it was end of the season all this??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.